SERVICES YOU NEED
Post submitted by Brian Davies. Thank You.
Editor’s Note: Lurking in the background of every loan product sold on new construction is a developer who was “playing ball” with the securitization infrastructure. It was the developer who setting the comparable pricing by raising prices every 2 months to create the illusion of a rapidly rising market. It was the developer who had the mortgage office on premises and screwed around the figures to get that mortgage done regardless of the viability of the deal. It was the developer who actually hired the drive by “appraiser” who contrary to industry rules was given the contract price, the target value and a higher fee for “playing ball.”
If they didn’t play they were out of the game they were left with nothing to do. Either lie or lose your livelihood. Now they face administrative charges from their licensing boards, insurance claims for errors and omissions and possibly criminal charges. (This is also known as music to the ears of Plaintiffs’ lawyers).
It was the developer who was doing the selling of these absurd homes at false prices, giving cover to the mortgage originator which was often a developer related entity that did virtually no due diligence and therefore was not following industry standards for underwriting. The developer made money coming and going and now they want a piece of the action even after the deal if you sell your home — taking a fee or equity piece from the eventual sales price of the home when you re-sell it.
Now the ankle-biting has begun, and the buy-back provisions of the assignment and assumption agreement (see me on you-tube) are being used to make claims on the developers. The purpose though is two-fold: one is to get damages from developers, which is probably unlikely since the very same people who are suing were the ones directing the show. The other one is for the securitization intermediaries to execute their back-up plan of plausible deniability.
They will say they didn’t know or realize what the developer was doing. They didn’t know that the developer whose sales of homes at increasingly ridiculous prices might fudge the paperwork a little to make sure the paperwork went through. It never occurred to them there was a moral hazard in letting the developer set the terms, the prices and the appraisals. If you believe that please call Bernie Madoff immediately. He has an incredible deal for you.
b.DAVIESMD@GMAIL.COM
216.168.213.235
Here is another issue. Builder originator (brokered) buyback for failure to comply with the agreements reps and warranties.
See buyback list for Hovanian—misrepresentations etc.
See INDYMAC FDIC V. HOVANIAN HOMES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT
This is another part of the puzzle. The FDIC is aware of the fraud, but chooses to do nothing.
brian davies
Filed under: bubble, CDO, CORRUPTION, currency, Eviction, foreclosure, GTC | Honor, Investor, Mortgage, securities fraud | Tagged: appraiser, comparable sales, developer, HOvnanian, Lennar | 13 Comments »