Banks Pushing Homeowners Over Foreclosure Cliff

Featured Products and Services by The Garfield Firm

NEW! 2nd Edition Attorney Workbook,Treatise & Practice Manual – Pre-Order NOW for an up to $150 discount
LivingLies Membership – Get Discounts and Free Access to Experts
For Customer Service call 1-520-405-1688

Want to read more? Download entire introduction for the Attorney Workbook, Treatise & Practice Manual 2012 Ed – Sample

Pre-Order the new workbook today for up to a $150 savings, visit our store for more details. Act now, offer ends soon!

Editor’s Comment:

Whether it is force-placed insurance or any other device available, banks and servicers are pushing homeowners, luring homeowners and tricking homeowners into foreclosures. It is the only way they can put distance between them and the collosal corruption of title, the fact that strangers are foreclosing on homes, and claims of predatory, deceptive and fraudulent lending practices.

Most of those five million homes belong back in the hands of the people who lost them in fake foreclosures. And that day is coming.

Foreclosures are good but short- sales are better as those in the real estate Market will tell you. Either way it has someone other than the bank or servicer signing the deed to the ” buyer” and eventually it will all come tumbling down. But what Banks and servicers are betting is that the more chaotic and confused the situation the less likely the blame will fall on them.

Watch out Mr. Banker, you haven’t seen our plan to hold you accountable. You might think you have control of the narrative but that is going to change because the real power is held by the people. Go read the constitution — especially the 9th Amendment.

Look Who’s Pushing Homeowners Off the Foreclosure Cliff

By the Editors

One of the more confounding aspects of the U.S. housing crisis has been the reluctance of lenders to do more to assist troubled borrowers. After all, when homes go into foreclosure, banks lose money.

Now it turns out some lenders haven’t merely been unhelpful; their actions have pushed some borrowers over the foreclosure cliff. Lenders have been imposing exorbitant insurance policies on homeowners whose regular coverage lapses or is deemed insufficient. The policies, standard homeowner’s insurance or extra coverage for wind damage, say, for Florida residents, typically cost five to 10 times what owners were previously paying, tipping many into foreclosure.

The situation has caught the attention of state regulators and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is considering rules to help homeowners avoid unwarranted “force- placed insurance.” The U.S. ought to go further and limit commissions, fine any company that knowingly overcharges a homeowner and require banks to seek competitive bids for force- placed insurance policies. Because insurance is not regulated at the federal level, states also need to play a stronger role in bringing down rates.

All mortgages require homeowners to maintain insurance on their property. Most mortgages also allow the lender to purchase insurance for the home and “force-place” it if a policy lapses or is deemed insufficient. These standard provisions are meant to protect the lender’s collateral — the property — if a calamity occurs.

High-Priced Policies

Here’s how it generally works: Banks and their mortgage servicers strike arrangements — often exclusive — with insurance companies in which the banks agree to buy high-priced policies on behalf of homeowners whose coverage has lapsed. The bank advances the premium to the insurer, and the insurer pays the bank a commission, which is priced into the premium. (Insurers say the commissions compensate banks for expenses like “advancing premiums, billing and collections.”) The homeowner is then billed for the premium, commissions and all.

It’s a lucrative business. Premiums on force-placed insurance exceeded $5.5 billion in 2010, according to the Center for Economic Justice, a group that advocates on behalf of low- income consumers. An investigation by Benjamin Lawsky, who heads New York State’s Department of Financial Services, has found nearly 15 percent of the premiums flow back to the banks.

It doesn’t end there. Lenders often get an additional cut of the profits by reinsuring the force-placed policy through the bank’s insurance subsidiary. That puts the lender in the conflicted position of requiring insurance to protect its collateral but with a financial incentive to never pay out a claim.

Both New York and California regulators have found the loss ratio on these policies — the percentage of premiums paid on claims — to be significantly lower than what insurers told the state they expected to pay out, suggesting that premiums are too high. For instance, most insurers estimate a loss ratio of 55 percent, meaning they’ll have to pay out about 55 cents on the dollar. But actual loss ratios have averaged about 20 percent over the last six years.

It’s worth noting that force-placed policies often provide less protection than cheaper policies available on the open market, a fact often not clearly disclosed. The policies generally protect the lender’s financial interest, not the homeowner’s. If a fire wipes out a house, most force-placed policies would pay only to repair the structure and nothing else.

Lack of Clarity

Homeowners can obviously avoid force-placed insurance by keeping their coverage current. Banks are required to remove the insurance as soon as a homeowner offers proof of other coverage. But the system, as the New York state investigation and countless lawsuits have demonstrated, is defined by a woeful lack of clarity, so much so that Fannie Mae has issued a directive to loan servicers to lower insurance costs and speed up removal times. And it said it would no longer reimburse commissions. The recent settlement with five financial firms over foreclosure abuses also requires banks to limit excessive coverage and ensure policies are purchased “for a commercially reasonable price.”

That’s not enough. Tougher standards should be applied uniformly, regardless of the loan source. Freddie Mac should follow Fannie Mae’s lead and require competitive pricing on the loans it backs. The consumer bureau should require mortgage servicers to reinstate a homeowner’s previous policy whenever possible, or to obtain competitive bids when not.

The bureau should also prevent loan servicers from accepting commissions or, at the very least, prohibit commissions from inflating the premium. It should require servicers to better communicate to borrowers that their policy has lapsed, explain clearly what force-placed insurance will cost and extend a grace period to secure new coverage. Finally, states should follow the example of California, which recently told force-placed insurers to submit lower rates that reflect actual loss ratios.

Many homeowners who experience coverage gaps have severe financial problems that lead them to stop paying their insurance bills. They are already at great risk of foreclosure. Banks and insurers shouldn’t be allowed to add to the likelihood of default by artificially inflating the cost of insurance.

End of Bill of Rights?

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

COMBO Title and Securitization Search, Report, Documents, Analysis & Commentary CLICK HERE TO GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION REPORT

Twilight of Constitutional Private Property Rights | US Senate Banking Committee Hearing on Helping Fraudclosure-Harmed Homeowners

Posted by Foreclosure Hamlet on December 15, 2011

 see links on 4closurefraud.com

STARTS AT 19:40

Helping Homeowners Harmed by Foreclosures: Ensuring Accountability and Transparency in Foreclosure Reviews

Housing, Transportation, and Community Development

Tuesday, December 13, 2011
02:30 PM – 04:30 PM
538 Dirksen Senate Office Building

COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS SUBCOMMITTEE ON HOUSING, TRANSPORTATION, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Witnesses

Panel 1

  • Honorable Julie Williams [view testimony]
    First Senior Deputy Comptroller and General Counsel
    Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Panel 2

  • Ms. Alys Cohen [view testimony]
    Staff Attorney
    National Consumer Law Center
  • Mr. David Holland [view testimony]
    Executive Vice President
    Rust Consulting, Inc.
  • Mr. Paul Leonard [view testimony]
    Vice President of Government Affairs
    Housing Policy Council of the Financial Services Roundtable
  • Dr. Anthony B. Sanders [view testimony]
    Professor of Finance
    George Mason University School of Management
  • Ms. Ann M. Kenyon [view testimony]
    Partner
    Deloitte & Touche LLP
  • Mr. Konrad Alt [view testimony]
    Managing Director
    Promontory Financial Group, LLC

~

As you listen to this, keep in mind our Founding Fathers’ constitutionally provided property rights protections:

The truth is that the Founders were concerned about a range of human values, but property rights were high on their list. Their Constitution and Bill of Rights protected property in many ways:

* When it became clear that the ban on ex post facto laws was not broad enough to protect property, they partially plugged the gap with the Fifth Amendment, which (1) prevented any person from being deprived of . . . property, without due process of law and (2) required compensation when property [was] taken for public use (Freddie/Fannie/Ginnie/HUD).

* They granted Congress authority to punish piracy, a crime directed principally against property (I-8-10).

* They adopted the Fourth Amendment, which protected persons, houses, papers, and effects from unreasonable search and seizure.

* They also inserted a number of other checks and balances, designed partly to protect minorities from unfair property confiscations.

More on the Founders’ mindset on property rights,

place[d] property ahead of freedom of religion, press, speech, and assembly, the right to petition the government, the right of self-defense, the right to be secure in one’s home, and the rights of the accused, including the right against self-incrimination and the right to a fair and speedy trial in which one may face one’s accusers. In short, the Framers placed property rights higher than all the rights that are most commonly associated with them.

 

Foreclosure Defense: Confusion in Florida — Butterfly Ballot Approach to Legislation

FLORIDA GETS PECULIAR AGAIN:

It was about 40 years ago that a decision out of a Florida court or a statute passed by the Florida legislature was taken to mean nothing in terms of precedent or national law. After that they passed many laws and created many court decisions that served as models for the rest of the country. Here is a GIANT STEP BACKWARD:

The Republican dominated legislature now wishes to make it very difficult if not impossible for the homeowner/borrower to defend their foreclosure, to even hire a lawyer or other professional consultant, or otherwise defend their rights under the due process requirements of the U.S. Constitution and the Florida Constitution, by the way, with which I am very familiar. Using the naming convention perfected by politicians performing slight of hand tricks on the public, they attempt to make it it as though this will rescue someone in foreclosure. It doesn’t. It makes it harder for them and easier on the “lenders” who are not even lenders.

From Dawn Rapaport, Esq..: Ft. Lauderdale, June 30, 2008

Foreclosure Rescue Fraud Prevention Act of 2008 is the new law going in to effect.  I need to write about it in the next couple days but the most glaring issue is that is does not exclude lawyers, it precludes ANYONE from taking any money as a retainer or in advance in exchange for helping in foreclosure rescue.  We have to get to the legislature and to Governor Christ to stop this law from going in to effect as it stands now.

CHAPTER 2008-79

Council Substitute for House Bill No. 643

An act relating to foreclosure fraud; creating s. 501.1377, F.S.; providing

legislative findings and intent with respect to the need to protect

homeowners who enter into agreements designed to save their

homes from foreclosure; providing definitions; prohibiting a foreclosure-

rescue consultant from engaging in certain acts or failing to

perform contracted services; requiring that all agreements for foreclosure-

related rescue services and foreclosure-rescue transactions

be in writing; specifying information that must be in the written

agreement; requiring that certain statements in the written agreement

be in uppercase letters and of a specified size; providing that

the homeowner has a right to cancel the agreement for a specified

period and the right may not be waived; providing that the homeowner

has a specified period during which to cure a default under

certain circumstances; requiring equity purchasers to assume or

discharge certain liens; requiring that an equity purchaser verify

the homeowner’s ability to make payments under a repurchase

agreement; providing price limitations for repurchase transactions;

providing for a rebuttable presumption of certain transactions being

unconscionable under certain circumstances; providing for limited

application of the presumption; providing an exclusion; providing

that a foreclosure-rescue transaction involving a lease option or

other repurchase agreement creates a rebuttable presumption that

the transaction is a loan transaction and the conveyance from the

homeowner to the equity purchaser is a mortgage; providing limited

application of the presumption; providing an exclusion; providing

that a person who violates certain provisions commits an unfair and

deceptive trade practice as defined in part II of ch. 501, F.S.; providing

penalties; repealing s. 501.2078, F.S., relating to violations involving

individual homeowners during the course of residential foreclosure

proceedings; providing an effective date.

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

Section 1. Section 501.1377, Florida Statutes, is created to read:

501.1377 Violations involving homeowners during the course of residential

foreclosure proceedings.—

(1) LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND INTENT.—The Legislature finds

that homeowners who are in default on their mortgages, in foreclosure, or

at risk of losing their homes due to nonpayment of taxes may be vulnerable

to fraud, deception, and unfair dealings with foreclosure-rescue consultants

or equity purchasers. The intent of this section is to provide a homeowner

with information necessary to make an informed decision regarding the sale

or transfer of his or her home to an equity purchaser. It is the further intent

of this section to require that foreclosure-related rescue services agreements

be expressed in writing in order to safeguard homeowners against deceit and

financial hardship; to ensure, foster, and encourage fair dealing in the sale

1

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.

and purchase of homes in foreclosure or default; to prohibit representations

that tend to mislead; to prohibit or restrict unfair contract terms; to provide

a cooling-off period for homeowners who enter into contracts for services

related to saving their homes from foreclosure or preserving their rights to

possession of their homes; to afford homeowners a reasonable and meaningful

opportunity to rescind sales to equity purchasers; and to preserve and

protect home equity for the homeowners of this state.

(2) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term:

(a) “Equity purchaser” means any person who acquires a legal, equitable,

or beneficial ownership interest in any residential real property as a result

of a foreclosure-rescue transaction. The term does not apply to a person who

acquires the legal, equitable, or beneficial interest in such property:

1. By a certificate of title from a foreclosure sale conducted under chapter

45;

2. At a sale of property authorized by statute;

3. By order or judgment of any court;

4. From a spouse, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, or sibling of the

person or the person’s spouse; or

5. As a deed in lieu of foreclosure, a workout agreement, a bankruptcy

plan, or any other agreement between a foreclosing lender and a homeowner.

(b) “Foreclosure-rescue consultant” means a person who directly or indirectly

makes a solicitation, representation, or offer to a homeowner to provide

or perform, in return for payment of money or other valuable consideration,

foreclosure-related rescue services. The term does not apply to:

1. A person excluded under s. 501.212.

2. A person acting under the express authority or written approval of the

United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or other

department or agency of the United States or this state to provide foreclosure-

related rescue services.

3. A charitable, not-for-profit agency or organization, as determined by

the United States Internal Revenue Service under s. 501(c)(3) of the Internal

Revenue Code, which offers counseling or advice to an owner of residential

real property in foreclosure or loan default if the agency or organization does

not contract for foreclosure-related rescue services with a for-profit lender

or person facilitating or engaging in foreclosure-rescue transactions.

4. A person who holds or is owed an obligation secured by a lien on any

residential real property in foreclosure if the person performs foreclosurerelated

rescue services in connection with this obligation or lien and the

obligation or lien was not the result of or part of a proposed foreclosure

reconveyance or foreclosure-rescue transaction.

Ch. 2008-79 LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 2008-79

2

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.

5. A financial institution as defined in s. 655.005 and any parent or

subsidiary of the financial institution or of the parent or subsidiary.

6. A licensed mortgage broker, mortgage lender, or correspondent mortgage

lender that provides mortgage counseling or advice regarding residential

real property in foreclosure, which counseling or advice is within the

scope of services set forth in chapter 494 and is provided without payment

of money or other consideration other than a mortgage brokerage fee as

defined in s. 494.001.

(c) “Foreclosure-related rescue services” means any good or service related

to, or promising assistance in connection with:

1. Stopping, avoiding, or delaying foreclosure proceedings concerning

residential real property; or

2. Curing or otherwise addressing a default or failure to timely pay with

respect to a residential mortgage loan obligation.

(d) “Foreclosure-rescue transaction” means a transaction:

1. By which residential real property in foreclosure is conveyed to an

equity purchaser and the homeowner maintains a legal or equitable interest

in the residential real property conveyed, including, without limitation, a

lease option interest, an option to acquire the property, an interest as beneficiary

or trustee to a land trust, or other interest in the property conveyed;

and

2. That is designed or intended by the parties to stop, avoid, or delay

foreclosure proceedings against a homeowner’s residential real property.

(e) “Homeowner” means any record title owner of residential real property

that is the subject of foreclosure proceedings.

(f) “Residential real property” means real property consisting of onefamily

to four-family dwelling units, one of which is occupied by the owner

as his or her principal place of residence.

(g) “Residential real property in foreclosure” means residential real property

against which there is an outstanding notice of the pendency of foreclosure

proceedings recorded pursuant to s. 48.23.

(3) PROHIBITED ACTS.—In the course of offering or providing foreclosure-

related rescue services, a foreclosure-rescue consultant may not:

(a) Engage in or initiate foreclosure-related rescue services without first

executing a written agreement with the homeowner for foreclosure-related

rescue services; or

(b) Solicit, charge, receive, or attempt to collect or secure payment, directly

or indirectly, for foreclosure-related rescue services before completing

or performing all services contained in the agreement for foreclosure-related

rescue services.

Ch. 2008-79 LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 2008-79

3

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.

(4) FORECLOSURE-RELATED RESCUE SERVICES; WRITTEN

AGREEMENT.—

(a) The written agreement for foreclosure-related rescue services must be

printed in at least 12-point uppercase type and signed by both parties. The

agreement must include the name and address of the person providing

foreclosure-related rescue services, the exact nature and specific detail of

each service to be provided, the total amount and terms of charges to be paid

by the homeowner for the services, and the date of the agreement. The date

of the agreement may not be earlier than the date the homeowner signed the

agreement. The foreclosure-rescue consultant must give the homeowner a

copy of the agreement to review not less than 1 business day before the

homeowner is to sign the agreement.

(b) The homeowner has the right to cancel the written agreement without

any penalty or obligation if the homeowner cancels the agreement within

3 business days after signing the written agreement. The right to cancel may

not be waived by the homeowner or limited in any manner by the foreclosure-

rescue consultant. If the homeowner cancels the agreement, any payments

that have been given to the foreclosure-rescue consultant must be

returned to the homeowner within 10 business days after receipt of the

notice of cancellation.

(c) An agreement for foreclosure-related rescue services must contain,

immediately above the signature line, a statement in at least 12-point uppercase

type that substantially complies with the following:

HOMEOWNER’S RIGHT OF CANCELLATION

YOU MAY CANCEL THIS AGREEMENT FOR FORECLOSURERELATED

RESCUE SERVICES WITHOUT ANY PENALTY OR OBLIGATION

WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS FOLLOWING THE DATE THIS

AGREEMENT IS SIGNED BY YOU.

THE FORECLOSURE-RESCUE CONSULTANT IS PROHIBITED BY

LAW FROM ACCEPTING ANY MONEY, PROPERTY, OR OTHER FORM

OF PAYMENT FROM YOU UNTIL ALL PROMISED SERVICES ARE

COMPLETE. IF FOR ANY REASON YOU HAVE PAID THE CONSULTANT

BEFORE CANCELLATION, YOUR PAYMENT MUST BE RETURNED

TO YOU NO LATER THAN 10 BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE

CONSULTANT RECEIVES YOUR CANCELLATION NOTICE.

TO CANCEL THIS AGREEMENT, A SIGNED AND DATED COPY OF A

STATEMENT THAT YOU ARE CANCELLING THE AGREEMENT

SHOULD BE MAILED (POSTMARKED) OR DELIVERED TO ……..

(NAME) AT …….. (ADDRESS) NO LATER THAN MIDNIGHT OF ……..

(DATE).

IMPORTANT: IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOU CONTACT YOUR

LENDER OR MORTGAGE SERVICER BEFORE SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT.

YOUR LENDER OR MORTGAGE SERVICER MAY BE WILLING

TO NEGOTIATE A PAYMENT PLAN OR A RESTRUCTURING WITH

YOU FREE OF CHARGE.

Ch. 2008-79 LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 2008-79

4

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.

(d) The inclusion of the statement does not prohibit the foreclosure rescue

consultant from giving the homeowner more time in which to cancel

the agreement than is set forth in the statement, provided all other requirements

of this subsection are met.

(e) The foreclosure-rescue consultant must give the homeowner a copy of

the signed agreement within 3 hours after the homeowner signs the agreement.

(5) FORECLOSURE-RESCUE TRANSACTIONS; WRITTEN AGREEMENT.—

(a)1. A foreclosure-rescue transaction must include a written agreement

prepared in at least 12-point uppercase type that is completed, signed, and

dated by the homeowner and the equity purchaser before executing any

instrument from the homeowner to the equity purchaser quitclaiming, assigning,

transferring, conveying, or encumbering an interest in the residential

real property in foreclosure. The equity purchaser must give the homeowner

a copy of the completed agreement within 3 hours after the homeowner

signs the agreement. The agreement must contain the entire understanding

of the parties and must include:

a. The name, business address, and telephone number of the equity purchaser.

b. The street address and full legal description of the property.

c. Clear and conspicuous disclosure of any financial or legal obligations

of the homeowner that will be assumed by the equity purchaser.

d. The total consideration to be paid by the equity purchaser in connection

with or incident to the acquisition of the property by the equity purchaser.

e. The terms of payment or other consideration, including, but not limited

to, any services that the equity purchaser represents will be performed

for the homeowner before or after the sale.

f. The date and time when possession of the property is to be transferred

to the equity purchaser.

2. A foreclosure-rescue transaction agreement must contain, above the

signature line, a statement in at least 12-point uppercase type that substantially

complies with the following:

I UNDERSTAND THAT UNDER THIS AGREEMENT I AM SELLING

MY HOME TO THE OTHER UNDERSIGNED PARTY.

3. A foreclosure-rescue transaction agreement must state the specifications

of any option or right to repurchase the residential real property in

foreclosure, including the specific amounts of any escrow payments or deposit,

down payment, purchase price, closing costs, commissions, or other

fees or costs.

Ch. 2008-79 LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 2008-79

5

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.

4. A foreclosure-rescue transaction agreement must comply with all applicable

provisions of 15 U.S.C. ss. 1600 et seq. and related regulations.

(b) The homeowner may cancel the foreclosure-rescue transaction agreement

without penalty if the homeowner notifies the equity purchaser of such

cancellation no later than 5 p.m. on the 3rd business day after signing the

written agreement. Any moneys paid by the equity purchaser to the homeowner

or by the homeowner to the equity purchaser must be returned at

cancellation. The right to cancel does not limit or otherwise affect the homeowner’s

right to cancel the transaction under any other law. The right to

cancel may not be waived by the homeowner or limited in any way by the

equity purchaser. The equity purchaser must give the homeowner, at the

time the written agreement is signed, a notice of the homeowner’s right to

cancel the foreclosure-rescue transaction as set forth in this subsection. The

notice, which must be set forth on a separate cover sheet to the written

agreement that contains no other written or pictorial material, must be in

at least 12-point uppercase type, double-spaced, and read as follows:

NOTICE TO THE HOMEOWNER/SELLER

PLEASE READ THIS FORM COMPLETELY AND CAREFULLY. IT

CONTAINS VALUABLE INFORMATION REGARDING CANCELLATION

RIGHTS.

BY THIS CONTRACT, YOU ARE AGREEING TO SELL YOUR HOME.

YOU MAY CANCEL THIS TRANSACTION AT ANY TIME BEFORE 5:00

P.M. OF THE THIRD BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING RECEIPT OF THIS

NOTICE.

THIS CANCELLATION RIGHT MAY NOT BE WAIVED IN ANY MANNER

BY YOU OR BY THE PURCHASER.

ANY MONEY PAID DIRECTLY TO YOU BY THE PURCHASER MUST

BE RETURNED TO THE PURCHASER AT CANCELLATION. ANY

MONEY PAID BY YOU TO THE PURCHASER MUST BE RETURNED TO

YOU AT CANCELLATION.

TO CANCEL, SIGN THIS FORM AND RETURN IT TO THE PURCHASER

BY 5:00 P.M. ON …….. (DATE) AT …….. (ADDRESS). IT IS BEST

TO MAIL IT BY CERTIFIED MAIL OR OVERNIGHT DELIVERY, RETURN

RECEIPT REQUESTED, AND TO KEEP A PHOTOCOPY OF THE

SIGNED FORM AND YOUR POST OFFICE RECEIPT.

I (we) hereby cancel this transaction.

Seller’s Signature

Printed Name of Seller

Seller’s Signature

Printed Name of Seller

Date

(c) In any foreclosure-rescue transaction in which the homeowner is provided

the right to repurchase the residential real property, the homeowner

has a 30-day right to cure any default of the terms of the contract with the

equity purchaser, and this right to cure may be exercised on up to three

separate occasions. The homeowner’s right to cure must be included in any

written agreement required by this subsection.

Ch. 2008-79 LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 2008-79

6

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.

(d) In any foreclosure-rescue transaction, before or at the time of conveyance,

the equity purchaser must fully assume or discharge any lien in foreclosure

as well as any prior liens that will not be extinguished by the

foreclosure.

(e) If the homeowner has the right to repurchase the residential real

property, the equity purchaser must verify and be able to demonstrate that

the homeowner has or will have a reasonable ability to make the required

payments to exercise the option to repurchase under the written agreement.

For purposes of this subsection, there is a rebuttable presumption that the

homeowner has a reasonable ability to make the payments required to

repurchase the property if the homeowner’s monthly payments for primary

housing expenses and regular monthly principal and interest payments on

other personal debt do not exceed 60 percent of the homeowner’s monthly

gross income.

(f) If the homeowner has the right to repurchase the residential real

property, the price the homeowner pays may not be unconscionable, unfair,

or commercially unreasonable. A rebuttable presumption, solely between

the equity purchaser and the homeowner, arises that the foreclosure-rescue

transaction was unconscionable if the homeowner’s repurchase price is

greater than 17 percent per annum more than the total amount paid by the

equity purchaser to acquire, improve, maintain, and hold the property. Unless

the repurchase agreement or a memorandum of the repurchase agreement

is recorded in accordance with s. 695.01, the presumption arising

under this subsection shall not apply against creditors or subsequent purchasers

for a valuable consideration and without notice.

(6) REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION.—Any foreclosure-rescue transaction

involving a lease option or other repurchase agreement creates a rebuttable

presumption, solely between the equity purchaser and the homeowner,

that the transaction is a loan transaction and the conveyance from the

homeowner to the equity purchaser is a mortgage under s. 697.01. Unless

the lease option or other repurchase agreement, or a memorandum of the

lease option or other repurchase agreement, is recorded in accordance with

s. 695.01, the presumption created under this subsection shall not apply

against creditors or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration and

without notice.

(7) VIOLATIONS.—A person who violates any provision of this section

commits an unfair and deceptive trade practice as defined in part II of this

chapter. Violators are subject to the penalties and remedies provided in part

II of this chapter, including a monetary penalty not to exceed $15,000 per

violation.

Section 2. Section 501.2078, Florida Statutes, is repealed.

Section 3. This act shall take effect October 1, 2008.

Approved by the Governor May 28, 2008.

Filed in Office Secretary of State May 28, 2008.

Ch. 2008-79 LAWS OF FLORIDA Ch. 2008-79

7

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.


Dawn M. Rapoport, Esq.
Dawn M. Rapoport, P.A.
1314 East Las Olas Blvd. # 121
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Ph: 754-235-7635
Fax: 954-337-3759

WINDS OF WAR: Congress’ Lack of Patriotism

Our division of opinion on the Wars in Iraq, Afganistan and secret wars being conducted by our government has become so confused, with the assistance of an extremely lazy and under-resourced media, that real discourse leading to compromise and resolution of the issues has become our greatest challenge. In other words, we are not talking about the real issues. Instead we are talking from ideological mindsets and assumptions that do not permit facts or alternative possibilities to enter into our discussion.

We have lost our way, lost our moral leadership and standing, and are viewed with suspicion and fear around the world. We have a constitution but everybody on all sides of every issue wants to ignore its provisions. Lies about WMD, personal agendas, and ideological crusades are NOT the reason we are in Iraq without clearcut goals and missions. The reason the goalpost keeps moving is NOT the incompetence of the Bush administration. The reason is that we stopped following rules we all swear to when we pledge allegiance to the Flag or swear to protect the United States Constitution.

On War, the constitution is quite clear and nobody contests that. There are arguments that certain provisions are impractical or wrong — just like on issues like abortion, guns, etc.. But just as slavery was contained in our constitution and we all decided that it was wrong, we made sure that the whole concept of slavery and inferior races was prohibited by amending the consitution and taking it out. If you disagree with the constitution there are provisions available for amending it through the political process. In the meanwhile, in a nation of laws, whatever it says IS the law and anyone who suggests ignoring its provisions is attacking the foundation of our republic. Anyone who suggests changing it by amendment is acting as a true patriot whether you agree with him/her or not. Anyone who suggests or acts on ignoring the constitution is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.

Bush is not the culprit here. It was congress who ignored the constitution and acted accordingly. The Iraq resolution was a delegation of power to the president to declare war. He committed no act of treason by asking for the power. When Congress delegated that power to the President, they violated the very core, intent and express wording of the consitution, which provides that ONLY Congress may declare war and ONLY congress may vote to fund it to such extent as congress deems necessary. True a President who knowingly accepts powers not authorized by the consitution is acting wrongly,and equally true he shouldn’t have asked for it. But he didn’t actually do it, Congress did.

So now we have a war declared by the President (i.e., unauthorized) with congress voting to fund it (unauthroized because they never declared war in the first place), with virtually no oversight to determine what policies should be funded and what policies should be changed. Instead we are wasting our time blaming each other and pointing fingers at unpatriotic people who either support the war or are against it. It isn’t the people who are unpatriotic, it’s Congress.

Every congressman, every congresswoman, every Senator who voted for the Iraq war resolution committed an act of violence to our republic — not because the war itself was wrong or right but because they were giving the power to decide on the war to the one person the writers of the constitution did NOT want to see holding that power. If we really want to see the president holding the power to make and declare war then the constitution needs to be amended according to its own terms. I for one hope that such an amendment is never introduced or passed. But if it is, then we can expect more disgrace in the eyes of the world not so much for what we do, but for the way we did it.

%d bloggers like this: