I keep receiving messages, emails, and texts from homeowners who complain about the cost of legal retainers. Some people think help should be free and maybe they are right. But for now, that is not our system. And lawyers, far from being obligated to provide such free service, are required to pay off their loans and investment in education.
*
The first reason for the complaint is the same as everyone who wants access to the legal system to press a claim or defend one, to wit: the legal system is geared for the use of lawyers and lawyers spend at least 7 years of their education preparing for a license examination that will allow them to practice law. Then they spend another 2-5 years in various forms of apprenticeships before they are able to establish themselves within the firm or on their own.
*
So while laypeople have every right to appear without a lawyer, they are usually committing a fatal error in doing so. And to prove their claim or establish their defense costs a great deal of money even in minor cases. Most lawyers either paid for their education or received help for living expenses from family, friends, and loans. And the entire time they are in law school or apprenticeship they are passing up opportunities in the private sector for much higher-paying jobs, which results in lost income.
*
Do the math. If you want access to a lawyer, you have a baseline cost that must pay for their expenses, their investment, and then their time.
*
To be fair, a retainer of $2,000 for review and analysis of the documents you are referencing plus a review of the title chain is actually a low price. It is unfortunate that there is a general perception that reading and thinking is not “work” for which a lawyer should be compensated. This causes a disconnect and tension between the lawyer and the prospective client.
Nobody paid me to write this. I am self-funded, supported only by donations. My mission is to stop foreclosures and other collection efforts against homeowners and consumers without proof of loss. If you want to support this effort please click on this link and donate as much as you feel you can afford.
Please Donate to Support Neil Garfield’s Efforts to Stop Foreclosure Fraud.
CLICK TO DONATE
Neil F Garfield, MBA, JD, 75, is a Florida licensed trial and appellate attorney since 1977. He has received multiple academic and achievement awards in business, accounting and law. He is a former investment banker, securities broker, securities analyst, and financial analyst.
*
FREE REVIEW: Don’t wait, Act NOW!
CLICK HERE FOR REGISTRATION FORM. It is free, with no obligation and we keep all information private. The information you provide is not used for any purpose except for providing services you order or request from us. You will receive an email response from Mr. Garfield usually within 24 hours. In the meanwhile you can order any of the following:
Click Here for Preliminary Document Review (PDR) [Basic, Plus, Premium) includes 30 minute recorded CONSULT). Includes title search under PDR Plus and PDR Premium.
Click here for Administrative Strategy ANALYSIS AND NARRATIVE. This could be all you need to preserve your objections and defenses to administration, collection or enforcement of your obligation. Suggestions for discovery demands are included.
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER CONSULT (not necessary if you order PDR)
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER CASE ANALYSIS
*
FORECLOSURE DEFENSE IS NOT SIMPLE. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE OF A FAVORABLE RESULT. THE FORECLOSURE MILLS WILL DO EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO WEAR YOU DOWN AND UNDERMINE YOUR CONFIDENCE. ALL EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT NO MEANINGFUL SETTLEMENT OCCURS UNTIL THE 11TH HOUR OF LITIGATION.
But challenging the “servicers” and other claimants before they seek enforcement can delay action by them for as much as 12 years or more.
Yes you DO need a lawyer.
If you wish to retain me as a legal consultant please write to me at neilfgarfield@hotmail.com.
Please visit www.lendinglies.com for more information.
Filed under: foreclosure |
No one is against attorneys. The problem is #1 – you can’t even find attorneys to take these cases. #2 Precedent law is so bad no attorney wants to take the cases. A few good precedent law cases may change this. Settled cases that attorneys can’t see are not helpful to attorneys.
It is funny. When I’m Pro Se in a legal business dispute. That the high priced liar on the other sign usually complains to the courts that I (YES I) have an unfair advantage as a pro se. And their client has to pay while I do not. They are the biggest crybabies I ever seen when everything does not go exactly as they think should.
HOWEVER this is NOT the case in Fraudclosures. The equity and fairness of the Fraudclosure court is way way out of balance against the homeowners. And Somehow they are Actually paying the lowlife debt collectors liars while trying to defend the Fraudclosure as a Pro Se.
LAWYERS Could collect when the monies owed the homeowner is collected.