Why it isn’t really a trust — REMIC or otherwise.

The certificate holders are creditors of the beneficiary investment bank who is merely doing the business under the name or label of the “trust.” In short, it is a recitation of an investment bank doing business with itself.

If you name your car Mary Ann it does not imbue the car with the attributes of a living being. But there is no harm in you thinking fondly of your car as Mary Ann. On the other hand, if the car is an accident you can file a police report or even a lawsuit claiming property damage but you can’t claim assault and battery because Mary Ann is still a car — i.e., property.

The financial community on Wall Street depends upon the ignorance or forgetfulness of nearly everyone when they create, promote or justify strategies borne in the securitization era.

So let’s review the basics. What is a trust, what are the components, and what does a trust do?

Trusts are among the fictitious “persons” that are allowed by law. They are formed for a variety of reasons. In legal actions, it is treated as though it was a person but everyone knows it is not a person. Coming up with the name for a trust is the first step in formation. But if you do nothing else there is no trust. It’s like saying you will name your car Mary Ann before you buy the car. The name exists, but not the car.

The next thing that is required by statutes in all US jurisdictions in the writing and signing of a “trust agreement.” But if you write up your grocery list and put the label “trust agreement” at the top of the page that doesn’t qualify as a trust agreement.

Why? Because no trust was created, organized, or registered anywhere, of course. But more importantly, the trust agreement consisting of your grocery list does not contain any of the elements of a trust agreement s required by statutes in the jurisdiction in which the “trust” was intended to be created.

So if you want your document to be a valid trust that gives powers to a named trustee to act on behalf of the trust for the benefit of beneficiaries you need all of the following elements:

  • Person setting up the trust. The person is commonly known as the trustor, though you may sometimes see the terms settlor or grantor.
  • Objective of the trust. You use different types of trusts to achieve a variety of specific estate-planning or other objectives. You can use some trusts for a business objective, while others help you achieve more than one goal.
  • Specific kind of trust. Trusts come in many different varieties. Regardless, when you’re setting up a trust, you need to decide what type of trust you want and make sure that you follow all the rules for that particular type of trust to make sure that it’s proper and legal, and carries out your intentions.
  • Property. After you place property into a trust, that property is formally known as trust property. [In the case of documents that bear a title relating to REMIC trusts the trust property could be the right to receive payments from homeowners — but only if the grantor legally owned the right to receive such payments.]
  • Beneficiary. A trust’s beneficiary (or, if more than one, beneficiaries) benefits from the trust in some way, usually because the person or institution will eventually receive some or all of the property that was placed into the trust — or the income from the property placed in trust. The property can be intangible (some legal entitlement) or tangible (ownership of real or personal property or an interest in property —- like a mortgage).
  • Trustee. The person in charge of the trust is known as the trustee. The trustee needs to understand the rules for the type of trust he or she is managing to make sure everything in the trust stays in working order. But if a person or business is named as trustee and they have no power, rights, or obligation to manage any property for the benefit if the trust and its beneficiaries, the “trustee label” is only a label and not the appointment of anyone who is required to do anything.
  • Rules. Finally, some of the rules that must be followed are inherently part of the type of trust used, while other rules depend on what is specified in the trust agreement. You will find still more rules in state and federal law.

Note that the typical PSA (Pooling and Servicing Agreement) is not a trust agreement even if it is labeled as such. It does not describe any property granted to the trustee or the trust, and the trustee has no power to do anything in connection with managing property for the benefit of beneficiaries who are not identified in the PSA.

In addition, the typical PSA contains only references to future events. A trust agreement would not be a complete creation of any trust without a legal grant of property by a grantor into the trust. And the typical PSA is unsigned or digitally singed by unknown sources. It is also incomplete in that the exhibits it refers to are not attached — most notably the Mortgage Loan Scheule which has not yet been created. And there is no recitation that anyone owns the loans on the schedule even later.

If you demand a copy of the actual trust agreement you will discover three things in the typical situation.

(1) the required elements of a trust are absent

(2) the purpose of the trust is to establish a name in which “legal title” only will be held by virtue of the execution of other documents purporting to grant title to the “trust” and

(3) the beneficiaries are one or more investment banks — i.e., they do not name any certificate holders as beneficiaries of the “trust” because they are not beneficiaries. The certificate holders are creditors of the beneficiary investment bank who is merely doing the business under the name or label of the “trust.” In short, it is a recitation of an investment bank doing business with itself.

So now you know that the lawyer who says he is filing the foreclosure on behalf of XYZ bank as trustee is not representing XYZ bank nor the tr just that is named and certainly not the certificate holders. I think more attention should be paid to his subject and the activities of lawyers who say they have a client when inf act they don’t. The circular logic of saying that they were hired by a company claiming to be a servicer because of some power of attorney signed by the company or bank named as trustee for a trust that has no property with a  trustee who has no powers, won’t survive scrutiny. But you’re going to be required to fight for it.


Nobody paid me to write this. I am self-funded, supported only by donations. My mission is to stop foreclosures and other collection efforts against homeowners and consumers without proof of loss. If you want to support this effort please click on this link and donate as much as you feel you can afford.
Please Donate to Support Neil Garfield’s Efforts to Stop Foreclosure Fraud.



Neil F Garfield, MBA, JD, 74, is a Florida licensed trial and appellate attorney since 1977. He has received multiple academic and achievement awards in business, accounting and law. He is a former investment banker, securities broker, securities analyst, and financial analyst.

FREE REVIEW: Don’t wait, Act NOW!

CLICK HERE FOR REGISTRATION FORM. It is free, with no obligation and we keep all information private. The information you provide is not used for any purpose except for providing services you order or request from us. In  the meanwhile you can order any of the following:
CLICK HERE TO ORDER ADMINISTRATIVE STRATEGY, ANALYSIS AND NARRATIVE. This could be all you need to preserve your objections and defenses to administration, collection or enforcement of your obligation. Suggestions for discovery demands are included.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER TERA – not necessary if you order PDR PREMIUM.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER CONSULT (not necessary if you order PDR)
  • But challenging the “servicers” and other claimants before they seek enforcement can delay action by them for as much as 12 years or more.
  • Yes you DO need a lawyer.
  • If you wish to retain me as a legal consultant please write to me at neilfgarfield@hotmail.com.
Please visit www.lendinglies.com for more information.


5 Responses

  1. Specifically, looking at security based “swaps.” Security-Based Swaps. Perhaps, Neil can enlighten. The problem is complexity. But if we don’t address — we lose.
    “The security-based swaps market is not a large market compared to the fixed income and equity markets, but it was at the core of the 2008 financial crisis. More recently, total return swaps were at the heart of the failure of Archegos Capital Management, a family office.
    This year, the SEC is implementing rules related to securities-based swaps. Security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants will begin registering with the Commission by Nov. 1.
    Further, on Nov. 8, new post-trade transparency rules will go into effect, requiring transaction data to be reported to a swap data depository and thus available to the SEC and, under appropriate circumstances, other regulators. Then, beginning on Feb. 14, 2022, the swap data repositories will be required to disseminate data about individual transactions to the public, including the key economic terms, price, and notional value”.

  2. The problem is lack of focus in Congress. See link. Instead of focusing on GREED – they focus on wrong issues. Rent is now being escalated to obscene levels. Foreclosures were converted to rentals. SEC is addressing securitization – it is massive mess of details that beg for fraud. They allow because government likes the private market crooks. Java, you have been correct – the eventual goal is no home ownership. Socialism. That is the price of policies today. And, that is why Congress turned a blind eye. Focus is OFF. Will take some time to read SEC proposed rules.

  3. Yes. ANON. Correct !!

    The lowlife debit collectors attorney motion to substitute US BANK NA Trustee for SLS as plaintiff.
    He kept telling the court my client. My client. My client. However none of them are his client. First he states SLS was his client. Then states US Bank NA Trustee is his his client. The he is attorney for Truman Trust his client.

    But never did he say his REAL client. Truman CAPITAL.

    I objected and of course overruled by the clown dressed in the robe.

  4. US BANK NA Trustee for Truman Trust SC6-2016 ????????

    And who is Mitchell Sandberg @ Truman Capital how did they get this allegedly from FreddieMac.

    Please explain this ……Fraud. Ponzi. Lies ????

  5. Absolutely correct — QUOTE – “So now you know that the lawyer who says he is filing the foreclosure on behalf of XYZ bank as trustee is not representing XYZ bank nor the tr just that is named and certainly not the certificate holders. I think more attention should be paid to his subject ”
    The crisis trusts were fake, as is anything derived from those fake trusts. Trusts can be set up without securitization, but there still needs to be a valid trustee “legal holder.” But in the case of the crisis loan private label “trusts” – which claimed valid securitization – no securitization ever occurred as no accounting or funding ever occurred. Cannot create securitization from thin air without any accounting to begin with. Securitization is the removal of on balance sheet asset receivables to off-balance sheet conduits. If no on-balance sheet receivables – no securitization. So what kind of trust do they claim they established? More importantly – why no mortgage on balance sheet accounting? Because – nothing was funded other than cash-out. You thought you got a mortgage that paid off the prior loan by YOU. NOT — never happened. LIQUIDATED and REINSTATED – before any payment was ever actually missed. Contract should be VOID.

Contribute to the discussion!

%d bloggers like this: