Tracking The Presumed Payment of Value for the Underlying Debt

One of the bigest lies in documents related to transctions with homeowners is “for value received.” In most cases no such “value” was paid or received by either of the parties to that document.

Paper checks have become a thing of the past. We have been too quick to assume they are not necessary — like paper ballots. But without corroborating evidence, the presumption arising from a document that recites “for value received” those presumptions can be busted wide open. But that only happens if you challenge it in a timely and proper manner.

Hat tip to Summer ChIc. She found the following description of the places that would have a record of a wire transfer. When you ask for a canceled check or evidence of the wire transfer the foreclosure mill will burst into flames. And you must understand that the reason is that there is no wire transfer in many situations and further if there is one, it didn’t come from the “lender” or “assignee” or anyone else who appears in the chain of title.

None of this makes sense to anyone who insists on viewing the status of the transaction as a loan. But it makes perfect sense to anyone who views the transaction as either completely fictional or simply an incentive payment to get the homeowners to execute the only documents that give rise to the sale of securities. The investment banks were not interested in loans. They were strictly interested in selling securities.

When you look at it the second way then you realize that there wouldn’t be any further “payments of value” because it was already paid. And the legal significance of that is this: endorsements of notes can be valid without consideration but assignments of a mortgage without transferring the debt by payment of value for the underlying obligation cannot be valid nor enforceable. Such assignments are, in all U.S. jurisdictions a legal nullity.

The endorsement of the note is often taken to be evidence of the transfer of the underlying debt. But that presumption is rebutted under existing law (for centuries) if there was no payment of value for the underlying obligation. That payment is presumed by apparent transfer of the right to enforce the note by transfer of possession of the original note and a grant of authority to enforce it. But that grant must come ultimately from the owner of the underlying debt.

So in discovery, it is important to test the sufficiency of each document that recites “for value received” or “for value paid.” In most cases, no such transaction occurred and that is exactly why you should test it in your discovery demands. If no such value was paid, either assignment of mortgage was a legal nullity or the note cannot be enforced.

While legal presumptions make it easy to file a claim for enforcement of the note, and without challenges from the maker it is then easy to get a judgment, that is turned on its head when there is no transaction and the maker reveals the lack of corroborating evidence for the presumptions, which are then rebutted or not applied. The foreclosure mill has nothing left under such circumstances. And that is one of the places in time — at the end of litigation — where confidential settlements occur that include scrubbing court files of any evidence of the case.

Practice hint: don’t ask for “proof of payment.” The word “proof” is a term subject to interpretation. The opposition could supply you with the same documents that they are relying on for the claim. A motion to compel based upon such request must be denied. A motion for sanctions would then become impossible.

You should ask for copies of any documents, agreements or correspondence that corroborate the recital of payment given or received. Documents would include evidence of write transfers. And that is where Summer Chic’s contribution is so important. This is taken from the Federal Reserve website.

The Wire Process

Most domestic wires are completed within 2-4 business hours from ordering.

Sending Bank

  •  Reviews Wire
  • Runs through OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control)
  • Sends to Federal Reserve
  • Receives a FED ID (also known as OMAD or IMAD #)

Federal Reserve

  •  Reviews Wire
  •  Sends to Receiving Bank

Receiving Bank

  • Reviews incoming wire
  • Runs through OFAC
  • Deposits funds in the title company account

What Your Clients Need to Know

  • All banks have different requirements and your client needs to have a conversation with their bank early in the transaction process:
    • Are there any fees involved to wire funds? Most banks will have fees for both outgoing and incoming wires.
    • Verify how many days prior to the closing the wire should be ordered for funds to arrive in time.
    • Can wires be ordered on the bank’s website or does the account holder need to be present in a branch to order?
    • International wires typically involve an intermediary bank and additional time.
    • Educate your clients about wire fraud and how to prevent it (see below).
    •  Wire instructions must be confirmed by calling the closing office using a known number such as the contact information on the title commitment.
    •  When ordering the wire, be sure to reference the Title Company’s file number, closer name and property address (found on the wire instructions form).
    •  After a wire is initiated at the sending bank, the buyer needs to notify your closing team via phone that the wire was sent.

What Could Slow Down a Wire

  • Extra approvals may be needed at each institution if funds are over $1 Million
  •  If the review by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) raises a red flag e.g. a common name on the wire that matches a name on a government list. The bank may need additional info from the individual such as date of birth, location of birth etc.
  •  Incorrect information (e.g. missing or incomplete bank information, file #, closer name, property address).

How to Track a Wire

Occasionally a wire needs to be tracked. In order to locate a wire a FED ID number is needed. The client will need to contact their sending bank to obtain the FED ID number.It will always start with the date, followed by letters then numbers. E.g. 20190912QMGFT0000000000. Give the FED ID number to the title company (via phone) to aid in tracking the progress of the wire.

Wire Fraud Prevention

From day one, inform your client on how you will be communicating with them throughout the real estate transaction and how any other parties involved in the
transaction (i.e. title company) will be contacting them. Let them know you will never ask them to send sensitive information via email.

  •  Do not open suspicious emails, click on any links or open attachments.
  •  Be wary of emails purporting to send new wire instructions or demanding funds several days or even weeks before closing.
  •  Make sure to change your usernames and passwords frequently and never use passwords that are easy to guess like password or 123456.
  • Do not save wiring instructions on your desktop and send to the client. Land Title always sends the instructions via a secured email.
  • Always double-check and verify the phone number contained in the email for the intended recipient of the wire.
  •  If in doubt call the title company directly using a known number, such as the number on the title commitment.
Rest assured, Land Title and their in-house IT team have implemented measures to ensure that all sensitive information a client provides is encrypted and protected on secure sites throughout the real estate transaction. Our closing team will also be in continuous communication with all parties involved in the transaction from beginning to end of the closing. Transferring funds via wire can be a safe and secure process, as long as all parties involved maintain communication and use simple security protocols to ensure that the funds arrive safely and on time.
DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE?

Nobody paid me to write this. I am self-funded, supported only by donations. My mission is to stop foreclosures and other collection efforts against homeowners and consumers without proof of loss. If you want to support this effort please click on this link and donate as much as you feel you can afford.
Please Donate to Support Neil Garfield’s Efforts to Stop Foreclosure Fraud.

CLICK TO DONATE

Click

Neil F Garfield, MBA, JD, 74, is a Florida licensed trial and appellate attorney since 1977. He has received multiple academic and achievement awards in business and law. He is a former investment banker, securities broker, securities analyst, and financial analyst.
*

FREE REVIEW: Don’t wait, Act NOW!

CLICK HERE FOR REGISTRATION FORM. It is free, with no obligation and we keep all information private. The information you provide is not used for any purpose except for providing services you order or request from us. In  the meanwhile you can order any of the following:
CLICK HERE ORDER ADMINISTRATIVE STRATEGY, ANALYSIS AND NARRATIVE. This could be all you need to preserve your objections and defenses to administration, collection or enforcement of your obligation. Suggestions for discovery demands are included.
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER TERA – not necessary if you order PDR PREMIUM.
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER CONSULT (not necessary if you order PDR)
*
*
CLICK HERE TO ORDER PRELIMINARY DOCUMENT REVIEW (PDR) (PDR PLUS or BASIC includes 30 minute recorded CONSULT)
FORECLOSURE DEFENSE IS NOT SIMPLE. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE OF A FAVORABLE RESULT. THE FORECLOSURE MILLS WILL DO EVERYTHING POSSIBLE TO WEAR YOU DOWN AND UNDERMINE YOUR CONFIDENCE. ALL EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT NO MEANINGFUL SETTLEMENT OCCURS UNTIL THE 11TH HOUR OF LITIGATION.
  • But challenging the “servicers” and other claimants before they seek enforcement can delay action by them for as much as 12 years or more.
  • Yes you DO need a lawyer.
  • If you wish to retain me as a legal consultant please write to me at neilfgarfield@hotmail.com.
Please visit www.lendinglies.com for more information.

 

4 Responses

  1. PS correction: Debtor definitely can challenge this contract by assignor since assignee plans to collect money from debtor since this “contract” is under FDCPA , RICO and Hobbs Act and may also be under SEC Act.

    All cases cited by Legisman are condition precedents based on false assumption that the initial debt existed and the party who called themselves “Lenders” were actual creditors.

    This is wrong at least during last 20 years. Once the first transaction was funded with other people money borrowed by Wall Street Banks and securitized, no further financing is necessary.

    All further “lending” is about selling homeowners information about money, not money itself.

    “Mortgages” merely reflect changes of DATA on Black Knight servicing system (who send you statements and letters) and described “terms of repayment” of information about someone’s non-existing debt which was used as a base in initial securitization.

    And it can be proven relatively easily – when Courts will stop stonewalling Big Banks from discoveries.

    All that people need to find is PROOF OF ORIGINAL LENDING.

    And this proof can be found either in alleged “Ledners” accounting records or Title Companies records; or Trustees who must collect payments to distribute them to alleged owners of the debt – investors.

    And no one listed above will not provide you this information.

    Thus, the “DEBT” is merely a fiction to steal your money as tax-free revenue

  2. Java: here is no debt, secured or unsecured. Wall Street “lend” information about debt for which they receive very handsome passive tax-free income from DONORS whom Stockbrokers fooled to think they are “debtors”

    ANON: You have YOURS cancelled check. But you need to find THEIR proof of lending you money.

    Legisman is again absurdly cited erroneous decisions none of which apply to the current housing market.

    In order to enforce an obligation, this obligation must exists first. Nobody has rights to enforce information about non-existing obligations.

    Just a quick pick:
    1. Borrowers cannot attack assignment.
    So, based on Legisman’s logic if a group of well-known racketeers like Countrywide Financial (now PennyMac and Caliber (recently jooined NewRez mob) present some bogus piece of paper signed by someone who never worked for MERS – he will pay for it without questions asked.

    2. The underlying contract] is between [Debtor] and [Assignor]. [Assignor’s] assignment contract is between [Assignor] and [Assignee]. The two contracts are completely separate from one another.
    False. First, it must be a VALID contract between Assignor and Assignee, in other word, Assignor must be the owner of the debt to be able legally assign it which is always referred as “sold”
    Second, debtor must have a legit debt, not information about money which nobody can prove.
    Third, Debtor definitely a part of this contract by assignee since assignor plans to collect money from debtor since this “contract” is under FDCPA , RICO and Hobbs Act and may also be under SEC Act

    3. Debtor’s] rights and duties under the [underlying] contract remain the same: The only change is to whom those duties are owed.
    Debtor’s RIGHT is to validate the debt and see proof of lending.
    . Debtor’s duties is to pay a legitimate owner of the debt. Nobody has duties to pay for information about someone’s non-existing debt which was misrepresented as a “new “Mortgage”

    4. As to plaintiff, an assignment merely substituted one creditor for another,

    CREDITOR. All parties who pretend to be “Lenders” are merely data collectors for Wall Street Banks. So, if the original “creditor” cannot provide any proof of financing (which can be found in their books and records or Title companies accounts where “lenders” wire money for the closing) they are scammers. Thus, all following parties who claim to be”creditors” are liars.

  3. Yes Anon. As I have been saying for 10 years. UNSECURED Debt. Sure they can run up the debt as high and for as long as they want.
    But the Debt Collector Scumbags should never be allowed to Fraudclose on any American Home !!!!
    (However If you try to sell or refinance, that would be a whole other can of worms to have to fight).

  4. OH – but what if you have a cancelled check? And, what if it never got to proper party? Wire transfers? Worthless to trace. Yes — cannot challenge PSA. Why? Borrower has no connection to securitization. So — why is trustee or trust there in court? Because the originators are gone — no successors. No one else to come forward. All gone.
    And, that is because – it never was a “refinance” loan. There was never any note to begin with. It is called REINSTATEMENT. Just added upon debt upon debt — no note — and the only way that debt can be transferred is by assignment. NO note – ONLY assignment. Why? The note is gone. Note gone before origination for any claimed debt. What we have is nothing more than credit card debt. You know — media said — “People used homes like an ATM” — BUT NO!!! It was not a credit card as presented — but that is how they processed. Nothing paid off as required by a mortgage. They know this. So do you. Thanks to all!!! It is so simple.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: