Making Objections and Opposing Them

A new publication has come to my attention that every trial lawyer should have, regardless of where they practice. It’s entitled NEW YORK OBJECTIONS. Obviously once you latch on to a point you would need to refer to the laws of evidence in your state or the laws of evidence in Federal proceedings or both. But because of constitutional protections all states must and do subscribe to the same rules of evidence with very few variations. The link is to an article/advertisement for the book. From there you can go buy it. I’m not selling it. I am recommending it.

If you are like most lawyers and pro se litigants you will need help in how to use your new found knowledge of objections and cross examination (there are separate books on cross examination).

Trial law is all about evidence. And evidence is all about the rules under which information or data can be accepted into evidence. Evidence is an asserted fact that can be considered by the trier of fact in making a final determination as to who wins and who loses. The amount of weight given to any evidence is entirely up to the trier of fact. Getting evidence into the record does not mean you won anything.

The trial court has maximum discretion on what evidence carries greater weight than other evidence admitted into the record. Decisions are reversed on appeal in only 15% of the filed appeals. The job of the appellate court is to determine whether there is any evidence that could support the Judge’s decision in the trial. The appellate court might tacitly agree with you that had they been trying the case it would have been decided differently. But that is not the standard. And THAT is why doing well at the trial level is the key to all cases.

Let us help you plan for trial and draft your foreclosure defense strategy, discovery requests and defense narrative: 202-838-6345. Ask for a Consult

PLEASE FILL OUT AND SUBMIT OUR FREE REGISTRATION FORM WITHOUT ANY OBLIGATION. OUR PRIVACY POLICY IS THAT WE DON’T USE THE FORM EXCEPT TO SPEAK WITH YOU OR PERFORM WORK FOR YOU. THE INFORMATION ON THE FORMS ARE NOT SOLD NOR LICENSED IN ANY MANNER, SHAPE OR FORM. NO EXCEPTIONS.

Get a Consult and TERA (Title & Encumbrances Analysis and & Report) 202-838-6345. The TEAR replaces and greatly enhances the former COTA (Chain of Title Analysis, including a one page summary of Title History and Gaps).

THIS ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE A LAWYER.

===========================

All information proffered as evidence, whether in testimony or documents, must have foundation. Foundation is credible information supporting the existence of an asserted fact. So for example if the question is “what is the amount presently due?” then in the absence of foundation, the answer is not admissible. However, if the objection is not made timely then the objection is waived. A late objection without some realistic explanation as to why it is late, will fail to keep the information out of evidence AND it will drill home the fact being asserted by mentioning it for a second time. Before asking a question like that the lawyer proffering the witness must establish that the witness knows through personal knowledge of facts showing that he/she knows the answer and not because someone else told him/her.

There are many other objections about which I have written on this blog. The most common error by lawyers representing homeowners is their failure to object as soon as the question is asked. And the most common excuse for that is that they don’t want to irritate the judge or look  foolish. You might just as well concede the entire case if you feel that way. At my age, it’s like doing squats at the gym. If your legs get tired after jumping up to object so often, then you may be doing the right thing. My legs often hurt and I have been known to seek permission of the court to remain seated for my objections.

Raising objections is more of an art rather than any objective set of rules. Preparation for trial means figuring out what objections you will raise and why. It’s easy for a judge to overrule your hearsay or foundation objection if you either don’t know what you are talking about or if you haven’t thought this out. The general practice is to rise and say “objection!” at the same time, the moment you figure out that the question is objectionable — which needs to be before the witness speaks. I like to do that adding”may I explain?” At that point I better have something thought out before trial as to why I raised an objection.

So in order to go to trial and be effective as defense counsel for a homeowner, you need to have a clear narrative in your head as to what you believe to be true and tailor your objections to that narrative. And your narrative needs to be extremely focused on the few paths that might provide traction for the defense. Shotgun trial objections almost always fail.

Timeliness is the principal reason why objections are overruled. Lawyers and pro se litigants will wait patiently, politely for the line of questioning to be concluded. That is when virtually every objection you could ever think of will be overruled.

Be careful about trial orders. I have seen judges repeatedly overrule any objections to admission into evidence simply because the objections were not preserved in accordance with the trial order. That doesn’t mean you lost the case; because on cross examination you can destroy the credibility of the witness and the evidence by showing a lack of foundation, even though you were not permitted to raise the objection. If something is admitted into evidence, that doesn’t mean you can’t attack it.

In foreclosure litigation cases, cross examination is all about foundation. Cross examination continues the narrative driving your objections. Each objection, each question should drive home the central points of your defense strategy.

4 Responses

  1. Poppy, we got the same treatment in Bankruptcy Court AND the Circuit Court.
    They are indeed criminals, including the judges that condone the bank fraud.
    These judges are flush with Wells Fargo stock. We know they are ruling in their own personal best interests: the retirement plan.

  2. I was in Federal Court last week and right off the rip, the judge was questioning me. What all of them don’t get, it could be them, easily. Swindler’s list of thief’s, with all their lies are known to everyone who’s been affected and no one has the courage to do the right things. These dirt bags have stolen Billions from small counties with MERS, stolen Millions of homes, corrupted deed offices across the country, corrupted titles, stolen Trillions from investors. Most average people are out funded, out lawyered, prejudiced, and taken advantage of. After they get done victimizing the homeowner, they pray the court gives them relief. For what? They are the vexatious litigators, they are the predators, they are the insiders…then they say we have a claim for which relief cannot be granted 12(b)(6)….are they serious? Or when asking for discovery they state: attorney client privilege. What? Records of a purchase “is not” a secret privilege, it is a must, to get relief. No verification of paperwork, affidavit, being sworn to, with serious errors, omissions, one paper contradicts the other, one “affidavit” says they work for US Bank NA, the very next one attesting to the first, says they work for Ocwen,…which is it cupcake? These are Sworn Affidavits people, not notes from your legal pad. They are “conclusions” not facts. I have a document that says: I,CLK, signed a Deed of Trust for the loan amount…NO, that is incorrect…it’s the note, moron! An affidavit stating: the note was signed in 2000…NO, it’s 2007. And then a scrivener’s affidavit trying to correct the incorrect date stating: to correct the error on the following affidavit, the correct date is 27 February 2000…attesting to the wrong date once again…it goes on and on. My personal submissions are scrutinized to the letter…if I forget ONE date in the document, a word…it is kicked out! The deception and lies go on and on…just saying, folks. The rules for us and the rules for them, are a complete travesty of justice. Near impossible to find “fair and equitable” in the courts.

  3. unless you’re in Wisconsin: no evidence needed

  4. Sounds good, but in practice I have seen little to any evidence to back up any court following true rules of jurisprudence and demanding true and actual evidence like a true, forensic chain of title, tracking of the history of note and trust deed, and more importantly, in my humble opine, an actual chain of the money transfers.
    Our very own government is involved up to their eyeballs in this, too many attorneys across the nation, and no one willing to take a true and honest stand across our wonderful country and actually stop all the wrongful foreclosures that are starting to heat up again.
    Anyone out there ever dealt with nasty, crooked “debt collector” Seterus trying to act like a “servicer” for Fannie Mae!! No one has any proof but they sure put on a phony shurade like Bank of America in demanding documents and insisting that one must qualify!! The reason people are looking for help is all the unique circumstances that vary from person to person is needing help that is NOT being given properly and based upon the suppoonsed new guidelines.
    All Seterus and others want is the money they don’t deserve and still using the phony, fabricated, forged, and even “robosigned” documents. Semper Fi. Time to pull the plug on the huge financial swamp.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: