[For every eight applicants who seek a mortgage, one is rejected]
In the mortgage arena, the lower your DTI ratio, the better. The federal “qualified mortgage” rule sets the safe maximum at 43 percent, though Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration all have exemptions allowing them to buy or insure loans with higher ratios.
Studies by the Federal Reserve and FICO, the credit-scoring company, have documented that high DTIs doom more mortgage applications — and are viewed more critically by lenders — than any other factor. And for good reason: If you are loaded down with monthly debts, you’re at a higher statistical risk of falling behind on your mortgage payments.
Using data spanning nearly a decade and a half, Fannie’s researchers analyzed borrowers with DTIs in the 45 percent to 50 percent range and found that a significant number of them actually have good credit and are not prone to default.
[First-time home buyers already burdened by debt often need help to qualify for mortgages]
“We feel very comfortable” with the increased DTI ceiling, Steve Holden, Fannie’s vice president of single family analytics, told me in an interview. “What we’re seeing is that a lot of borrowers have other factors” in their credit profiles that reduce the risks associated with slightly higher DTIs. They make significant down payments, for example, or they’ve got reserves of 12 months or more set aside to handle a financial emergency without missing a mortgage payment. As a result, analysts concluded that there’s some room to treat these applicants differently than before.
Lenders are welcoming the change. “It’s a big deal,” says Joe Petrowsky, owner of Right Trac Financial Group in the Hartford, Conn., area. “There are so many clients that end up above the 45 percent debt ratio threshold” who get rejected, he said. Now they’ve got a shot.
That doesn’t mean everybody with a DTI higher than 45 percent is going to get approved under the new policy. As an applicant, you’ll still need to be vetted by Fannie’s automated underwriting system, which examines the totality of your application, including the down payment, your income, credit scores, loan-to-value ratio and a slew of other indexes. The system weighs the good and the not-so-good in your application, and then decides whether you meet the company’s standards.
Fannie’s change may be most important to home buyers whose DTIs now limit them to just one option in the marketplace: an FHA loan. FHA traditionally has been generous when it comes to debt burdens: It allows DTIs well in excess of 50 percent for some borrowers.
But FHA has a major drawback, in Petrowsky’s view. It requires most borrowers to keep paying mortgage insurance premiums for the life of the loan — long after any real risk of financial loss to FHA has disappeared. Fannie Mae, on the other hand, uses private mortgage insurance on its low-down-payment loans, the premiums on which are canceled automatically when the principal balance drops to 78 percent of the original property value. Freddie Mac, another major player in the market, also uses private mortgage insurance and sometimes will accept loan applications with DTIs above 45 percent.
The big downside with both Fannie and Freddie: Their credit-score requirements tend to be more restrictive than FHA’s. So if you have a FICO score in the mid-600s and high debt burdens, FHA may still be your main mortgage option, even with Fannie’s new, friendlier approach on DTI.
Filed under: foreclosure | Tagged: Fannie MAe |
Homeowners were unfairly scapegoated by the media, politicians of all stripes and the bankers. The real problem was not the homeowners , rather it was the lenders who were making 2 , 3 and 5 year arm loans. If homeowners were given 30 year fixed loans, the foreclosure crisis would have never happened in the first place.
Reblogged this on California freelance paralegal and commented:
I would bet money that the National Association of Realtors had a hand in convincing Fannie Mae to raise the DTI. This is a bad decision that will guarantee that the real estate bubble will get even bigger so that when it pops it will be much worse than the last time.
I remember back in the day when it was 35%. Read this. Going back to the well for the banks and again putting tax payers at risk with fake money.
Sent from my iPhone
>
Hmmmm—- I thought Bernanke, and the media, told us that the borrowers were irresponsible. If that were the case, Fannie would not be doing this.
Fact is – people are now petrified of owning homes. That is what they did to us. And, the real irresponsibility lies with the banks, the government, and congressional deregulation of the financial services industry – not with borrower irresponsibility. . .