Chase-WAMU Letter Reveals”Expungement” and “Assignments” of Alleged Mortgages ” Not on the Books and Records of WAMU”

Posted on January 11, 2017 by Neil Garfield

There is an old saying on Wall Street that “Bulls make money, Bears make money but Pigs never do.” The obvious circumstances of Chase claiming ownership to nonexistent loan portfolios contained within WAMU coupled with the admission in this letter to the FDIC, shows just how arrogant Chase felt when they informed the FDIC that they wanted to get paid by the FDIC for expunging documents and fabricating other instruments for “loans” that were not on the books and records of WAMU at the time of their purchase and sale agreement wherein Chase acquired the WAMU estate.

Get a consult! 202-838-6345

https://www.vcita.com/v/lendinglies to schedule CONSULT, leave message or make payments.
 
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE A LAWYER.
—————-
see Letter from Chase to FDIC: chase-letter-to-fdic-2014
*
Hat tip to Bill Paatalo who reminded me of this letter that surfaced in the dispute over FDIC indemnification of Chase for the takeover of WAMU operations. Chase expressly admits to defects in the chain of title and erroneous mortgage documentation.
*
It has been central to the defense of foreclosures based upon alleged “loans” originated by Washington Mutual (WAMU) that Chase never acquired any loans. It is obvious from the the transaction where Chase agreed to pay around $2 Billion to the estate but received more than that in a tax refund due to the WAMU estate. So the consideration was zero.
*
Yet Chase has persistently asserted claims of ownership and direct or indirect authority to foreclose on loans that were not in the books and records of WAMU at the time of the FDIC sale to Chase.
Along with several others, I have stated the fact that Chase (1) acquired no loans (2) because they were not in the WAMU portfolio and that (3) a check of the WAMU books and records in the bankruptcy court will not show the loans that Chase says it acquired from WAMU. If WAMU didn’t own them then Chase could not have acquired them from WAMU.
*
In order to perpetuate this farce we have alleged that Chase was directly involved in the fabrication and forgery of documents to create the illusion of loans that didn’t exist on WAMU books and records and schedules in the receivership and schedules in bankruptcy.
*
Even a non-lawyer can see the problem for Chase. The letter in the link below clearly shows the lawyers asserting a claim for expenses in expunging records (i.e., destroying them) and fabricating other records which obviously leads to the issue of forging since the document itself was knowingly fabricated at the expense of Chase.
*
Somehow Chase came to the conclusion that having paid for the destruction of documents and having paid for fabricating documents, they were now entitled to call themselves owner of the “Loan portfolio” which according to the schedules never existed.
*
They admit to fabricating documents to create the illusion of a chain of title. Now they want payment from the FDIC to cover the expense of fabrication and forgery. Perhaps more importantly they admit “errors in mortgage documentation occurring prior to September 25,2008.”

  • Please Donate to Support Neil Garfield’s Efforts to stop Foreclosure Fraud.

    Please Donate to Support Neil Garfield’s Efforts to stop Foreclosure Fraud.

===========================

Email from Bill Paatalo:
Neil,
Have you seen this letter? The collusion between JPMC and the FDIC could not be any more transparent.
Excerpts from letter in italics:

The additional matters giving rise to JPMC’s indemnity rights relate to costs incurred in connection with mortgages held by WMB prior to September 25,2008. These costs have resulted from aspects of-and circumstances related to- WMB mortgages that were not reflected on the books and records of WMB as of September 25, 2008, and include:

[HERE IS A DIRECT ADMISSION THAT THERE IS A SCHEDULE OF LOANS “NOT REFLECTED ON THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF WMB.” IF NO SCHEDULE EXISTS SHOWING WHAT WAS “ON THE BOOKS AND RECORDS,” THEN WE SHOULD NOW INQUIRE AS TO THE SCHEDULE SHOWING THOSE LOANS NOT REFLECTED ON THE BOOKS AND RECORDS.]

(a) Costs incurred by JPMC associated with individual assignments of WMB mortgages. Where JPMC has initiated foreclosures on properties associated with mortgages that were held by WMB prior to its Receivership, JPMC has performed individual assignments of the associated mortgages/deeds of trust and allonges to comply with a recent appellate-level court decision in Michigan so as avoid potential additional expense and/or liability. In so doing, JPMC has incurred additional recording and legal fees, Limited Power of Attorney costs, as well as quantifiable costs associated with increased staffing to address these issues.

[THIS IS A DIRECT ADMISSION THAT ASSIGNMENTS AND ALLONGES ARE BEING EXECUTED BY JPMC (AS BENEFICIARIES AND MORTGAGEES) FOR WMB LOANS THAT WERE “NOT REFLECTED ON THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF WMB.”]

(c) Costs incurred by JPMC to expunge records associated with WMB mortgages as a result of errors in mortgage documentation occurring prior to September 25,2008, including erroneously recorded satisfactions of mortgages and associated legal fees and disbursements.

[“EXPUNGING RECORDS ASSOCIATED WITH WMB MORTGAGES AS A RESULT OF ERRORS IN MORTGAGE DOCUMENTATION?” THIS IS A DIRECT ADMISSION THE JPMC HAS DESTROYED RECORDS RELATED TO WMB MORTGAGE FILES.]

(d) Costs incurred by JPMC to correct various defects in the chains of title for WMB mortgages occurring prior to September 25, 2008, including recording and legal services fees.

[WHAT “CHAINS OF TITLE?” JPMC TAKES THE POSITION THAT THESE LOANS WERE NEVER SOLD BY WMB. THIS IS A DIRECT ADMISSION THAT JPMC IS ATTEMPTING TO CORRECT DEFECTS IN THE CHAINS OF TITLE FOR WMB LOANS THAT WERE NOT REFLECTED ON THE BOOKS AND RECORDS OF WMB. THESE “CORRECTIONS” UNIVERSALLY INVOLVE ASSIGNMENTS OF BENEFICIAL INTERESTS FROM THE FDIC, AND/OR BY VIRTUE OF THE PAA.]

At the time of WMB’ s closure, the above liabilities were not reflected on its books and records.
—

Bill Paatalo
Oregon Private Investigator – PSID#49411

BP Investigative Agency, LLC
P.O. Box 838
Absarokee, MT 59001
Office: (406) 328-4075

Filed under: foreclosure | Tagged: , , , , , , |

« »

7 Responses

  1. KG, on May 14, 2017 at 9:57 am said:

    Hello Starfire blue can you e mail me at kag2020@aol.com would like to ask a few questions.

  2. Nina Shear, on January 31, 2017 at 6:39 am said:

    Chase foreclosed and sold our home back to itself on December 6, 2016! We were ahead on our payments and they say we haven’t made a payment since 2012!! This is second time Ocwen and the bank has foreclosed! We are being evicted and can’t afford an attorney I have so much proof against them it’s obvious they have lied and inflated the amount we owe. But without spending a fortune for an attorney again we will lose our home! Texas has got to stop this! What do we do?! Who do we call?! The working middle class can’t afford the attorney fees and if we can we are still stuck with them as our mortgage company! And as we have seen from our settlement in 2011 it doesn’t do any good because they do it again! I prey for all of you and say keep every envelope and proof of payments . Good luck

  3. Rhody, on January 12, 2017 at 11:15 am said:

    Our servicer wrote to us that the promissory note we signed with Countrywide Home loans is in the warehouse of some bank. How do we get this investigated?

  4. unieshouse, on January 12, 2017 at 10:01 am said:

    This is how chase STOLE my home on February 3rd.2016 and left me at 67 homeless. They destroyed my credit under a false bankruptcy and I am stuck with no money or resources. It’s a great life if you trust Any bank and look what we’re getting in Washington.

  6. 1031frscom, on January 11, 2017 at 1:03 pm said:

    Good for you and keep up the fight. I have been at it for over 5 years with nasty old Bank of America and all its “co-conspirators like Shellpoint Mtg., Seterus (who is really bad and one person made claim they have NOTHING to do with IBM!!!

    I have the same problem in this little town in Colorado where the judges are very very poor and inept. Some became full time after being part time for a long time. Really sad. I say semper fi and hope that the 10th Circuit Court ruling in Colorado does not get shot down by all the crooks in this state that allegedly run out government God help us.

  7. starfireblue22, on January 11, 2017 at 11:13 am said:

    I am happy to say that we had a loan from WaMu in the debacle you have described. Our happiness is based upon the fact that Chase abandoned their foreclosure procedure, for obvious reasons stated above, and gave us the house free and clear after six years of making payments.

    We are still battling another foreclosure in which every entity involved has been fined by the government for one fraud or another. The corrupt culprits are, IndyMac, One West. HSBC, and Deutsche Bank. It doesn’t get any worse than this for here we are dealing with the “legal Mafia.

    In one of our pro se pleadings, we asked the court to go beyond the pleadings and take note of all the illegalities these four entities have admitted doing and which are present in our case. We are still awaiting the court’s decision on our Motion to Compel. I do not hold out much hope as the local judge knows very little about law. I fear we will have to appeal the coming decision.

Contribute to the discussion!

%d bloggers like this: