“My conclusion is that it’s pretty clear—from what she’s saying and the document that she attaches—that they’ve been doing what I’ve been saying they were doing all along: telling clients want to say. These are listed out for the attorneys to ask the witness, and the answers that the witness needs to give are right there. I find that to be extremely telling. It’s exactly what we thought was going on. When they talk about training of the witness, they’re teaching them what to say at trial, and it doesn’t matter whether it’s true or not.”
Editor’s Note: Head over to 4Closurefraud.com for the rest of this excellent expose on the coaching of Bank robo-witnesses.
Ocwen Lawyer Spoon-Fed Questions and Answers to Robo-Witnesses
Excerpted from @ The DBR
Note: The article from the DBR is about a year old but we now have the documents and emails in question.
A Royal Palm Beach attorney alleges an attorney for embattled mortgage servicer Ocwen Financial Corp. improperly spoon-fed questions and answers to unqualified witnesses testifying in foreclosure cases against Florida homeowners.
Foreclosure defense attorney Thomas Ice said he’s uncovered a script that was provided to Atlanta-based Ocwen witnesses to crush homeowner defenses and allegations of robo-witnesses by financial services sector employees who have no first-hand knowledge of mortgage details.
Ice represents St. Lucie County homeowner Thomas Rolle in foreclosure litigation brought by Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
Ocwen took over servicing the mortgage in early 2013, and the lenders initially brought in national law firm Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer to handle the litigation.
Attorneys for both sides exchanged exhibits during trial preparation, but Ice said a group of documents inadvertently emailed during the exchange exposed an in-house strategy to feed witnesses a list of prepared questions and answers.
In several documents, former Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer attorney Erin Prete outlined litigation tactics in a series of emails to colleagues addressing foreclosure defenses and strategies for debunking them. In one email thread, she provided a list of questions focused on default notices sent to homeowners to begin the foreclosure process…………
More at 4closurefraud.com.
Filed under: foreclosure |
.OCWEN,
And I think you mentioned this.
August 21, 2016 – Gary Dubin Co-Host: John Waihee Foreclosure Workshop #19: Bank of America v. Reyes-Toledo, A Case Study on How To Get Appellate Courts To Ask the Correct Questions (The entire oral argument before the Hawaii Supreme Court continues at the end of the recording below. Please therefore continue to listen to recording after Gary and John sign off.) (click here to listen)
Description of August 18, 2016 Oral Argument Details
Bank of America v. Reyes-Toledo Intermediate Court of Appeals Decision
________________________________
Neil Garfield posted: ” http://4closurefraud.org/2016/08/23/the-script-ocwen-lawyer-spoon-fed-foreclosure-questions-and-answers-to-robo-witnesses/ Editor’s Note: Head over to 4Closurefraud.com for the rest of this excellent expose on the coaching of Bank robo-witnesses. “
Reblogged this on Deadly Clear and commented:
I have yet to read a transcript where ANY bank witness has personally entered the homeowner information into the computer. With the unlimited access, both at the keyboard and behind the curtain, any information can and is many time corrupted and unaccountable. We know MERS was inaccurate and given a clear picture of the operation of a servicers’ platform – meaning depose the company IT manager or minion – you’ll find out how many breakdowns, changes and patches the systems encounter. Is the data accurate? Highly unlikely – and more likely to have experienced a few glitches over the years.
Every single bank is involved in fraud, forgery and counterfeiting American Mortgages.
In the 90s, Neil Bush, yes, those Bushes, was robbing American Taxpayers, using the FDIC.
In Michael Lewis’s book, “The Big Short”, a lot of people missed the fact that Lewis credits HFC-Household Finance Company as the template for later, predatory behaviors, in sub-prime lending.
(Lewis’s book is great, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. Read: the article called: “Securitization Fail”, by Adam Levitin, economics professor from Harvard, if I recall correctly).
(An attorney from Nantucket also has written an easy to digest, one-page article, called “Foreclosure, securitization don’t mix”, by Rockwell P. Ludden).
It is also true, George Senior was a one-time president because of the Long Term Capital Management, Keating Savings and Loan scandals…
Most people never realized, until Snowden, that George Senior and his banker pals also attacked and intentionally destabilized the Russian Ruble.
Anyway, Neil Bush was opening S&Ls; giving his friends loans and then bankrupting the bank. The net result was: his friends paid pennies on the dollar for their loans and the Taxpayers picked up their tab.
In part, to thwart criminals like the Bush Family, “REMIC Trusts” were created- more to the point: banks were encouraged to use “REMIC Trusts” to avoid tax consequences that were considered “burdensome”.
A “loan” was granted 90 days for a bank to enter that “loan” into lawful, REMIC Trust- the bank was then given “Tax-Deferred Pass-Through Certificates”…
Most often, the terms, “Pass-Through series” is part of the name on the phony “Trust” that claims the ability to collect on your “loan”.
Of course, if the bank didn’t enter the “loan” into lawful Trust, but said it did, within 90 days, the “loan” becomes “Null and Void” according to some.
(Others, myself included agree the “mortgage” was never intended as a “loan” for property in the first place, while, instead, a fraud of conversion, where money was stolen from 3rd parties- “tertiary funding”, illegal, in-and-of-itself- and identities (homeowner’s names and social security numbers) and collateral (American Homes) were stolen to place bets on Wall Street.
Supreme Court, 1872: Carpenter v Longan, explains: when a note and lien (contract and papers that show the amounts etc, pertainig to that contract) are “bifurcated (separated)”, the “mortgage” ceases to exist.
When Wall Street Criminals separated the paper contract (the Note) and put it in their own pocket and then passed the lien any multitude of times among themselves, in order to put phony bets on its performance, the “loan” became, “Null-and-void”.
(As an aside, within the “Pooling and Servicing Agreements-PSAs”, written to keep honesty among thieves, these criminals explained a violation of the “90-day rule”, voids the mortgage).
Every person in America has heard stories banks encouraged homeowners to “go behind” on their payments for at least 90 days, in order to qualify for Obama’s “Hamp” NONSENSE.
Once the homeowner went behind, the “loan” became “null-and-void” and triggered payoffs to the phony “Trusts” according to the PSAs that governed those “Trusts”.
THE BANKERS WERE HEDGING THEIR “NAKED SHORT SALE BETS” BY “MAKING A MARKET” (in foreclosures) FOR THE “DERIVATIVES” THEY WERE BETTING ON, AFTER “DUAL-TRACKING” THE “LOANS” THEY WERE CLAIMING THEY OWNED, USING FORGERY, FRAUD AND COUNTERFEITING.
Using American Mortgages to launder terror and drug cartel money is bad enough and voids any claim to solvency any bank within the central banking system may presently put forward…
Read an analysis of these behaviors, that exists as written by Federal Court Judge Gleeson and the “Deferred Prosecution Agreement-PDA”, written by the DOJ of the Obama Administration and used by AG Holder and AG Lynch, to conceal the banks are using American Mortgages to launder money for criminal cartels that have killed American GIs.
The banks, as we now know, stripped Pension Plans to pay the “loans”, in – full, on the front – end and then the banks counterfeited their interest in those “loans”, claiming they, the banks, gave the money… They didn’t; the Pension Plans of the Police, firemen, teachers and municipal workers were used to pay the “loans”, in-full.
The criminals then claimed “ownership” to the “loans” they then stole, for themselves, in order to collect interest and principal payments on “loans” the Pension Plans already satisfied, in-full.
A 100,000.00 “mortgage”, in this SCAM might return some $500,000.00 to the banks that stole the title, over the course of the “loan” (20, maybe 30 years).
BUT…
THAT ISN’T THE WORST OF IT…
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-is-how-much-money-exists-in-the-entire-world-in-one-chart-2015-12-18
THE BANKS CREATED 1200 TRILLION IN “NOTIONAL DERIVATIVES, NAKED SHORT SALE BETS”, THAT ARE SIMPLY, INTER-BANK, CRIMINAL WAGERS, THE BANKS CAN ROB PEOPLE’S HOMES, USING PHONY REMIC TRUSTS.
WHEN THE TIME COMES, NOT FAR OFF, THE BANKS CLAIM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE ON THE HOOK FOR THE BANKS’ DEBTS AND CRIMINAL BEHAVIORS- REMEMBER: THERE IS NO MECHANISM WITHIN ARTICLE 1, SECTION 8, THAT EXPLAINS WE THE PEOPLE MUST PAY FOR THEIR CROOKED LIES AND DECEIT.
THEY HAVE RUINED THEMSELVES- NOT US.
It is up to the American People to Nationalize the banks and prosecute the bankers. The “Derivatives” damage, to this very day, is not known, in its entirety: the banks refuse to report through the DTC and DTCC- the regulatory agencies designed to track and report on their phony, “Naked Short Sale Bets”, That Americans will lose their homes to counterfeit, forgery and fraud, aka: “Derivatives”.
~Michael Keane, all rights reserved, 8/19/16
Please feel free to share on FB
https://livinglies.wordpress.com/2016/08/24/new-york-judge-orders-release-of-hidden-documents/#comment-451045