Nearly 650,000 borrowers to receive more money from Independent Foreclosure Review

The clock is now at zero for the borrowers eligible for payment under the Independent Foreclosure Review Payment Agreements who have not yet cashed or deposited their check, and their money is going to the borrowers who already cashed their checks.

As it said it would last year, the Federal Reserve Board announced Monday that any leftover money from the $3.9 billion set aside for borrowers as part of the Independent Foreclosure Review will go to borrowers who already received money because some borrowers took too long to cash their checks.

The Fed said last year that borrowers who had not cashed their check had until Dec. 31, 2015 to request a replacement check. Those borrowers then had until March 31, 2016 to cash their new checks.

Now that March 31 has come and gone, there’s still more than $80 million left, and the Fed is directing the paying agent, Rust Consulting, to redistribute the funds to borrowers who cashed their checks by the March 31 deadline.

According to the Fed, the Independent Foreclosure Review Payment Agreement, overseen by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, provided $3.9 billion for borrowers of 13 servicers whose homes were in any stage of the foreclosure process in 2009 or 2010.

The affected borrowers’ mortgages were serviced by one of the following companies, their affiliates, or subsidiaries: AuroraBank of America, CitibankGoldman Sachs, HSBCJPMorgan ChaseMetLife BankMorgan StanleyPNCSovereignSunTrustU.S. Bank, and Wells Fargo.

In this disbursement, the servicers covered include GMAC Mortgage, Goldman Sachs/Litton Loan Servicing, Morgan Stanley/Saxon Mortgage Services, and SunTrust.

Additionally, some borrowers whose loans were serviced by HSBC or JPMorgan Chase may be covered, the Fed said.

Under the terms of the redistribution, every eligible loan will receive a payment of $124.30.

The Fed said that the disbursement effort is “consistent with the Federal Reserve’s intention to distribute the maximum amount of funds to borrowers potentially affected by deficient servicing and foreclosure practices.”

According to the Fed, borrowers receiving a redistribution payment will have the opportunity to request a name on a payment to be changed, a payment to be split, or a payment to be reissued.

The Fed said that all requests must be received by Rust no later than Sept. 30, 2016.

Then, in early-November, there will be a one-time mailing of redistribution check reissuances to accommodate all reissue, payee change, and split check requests.

All redistribution checks will expire on Dec. 31, 2016, the Fed said.


5 Responses

  1. Reblogged this on Deadly Clear and commented:
    Maybe borrowers didn’t cash the checks because they realize the issues are bigger than the payola. Or maybe $2.18 wasn’t worth the time to cash or deposit.

  2. Might want to print the address to write to get the check…and send comments…

  3. Under the terms of the redistribution, every eligible loan will receive a payment of $124.30.

    $124.30 ! Wow! Could these homeowners buy another property with this money? No wonder homeowners didn’t cash the check.

    Homeowners need something like free house over fraud. That would be considered as just and sufficient.

  4. Opinion
    Someone took $300 for the theft of their home.
    A real life calf would cost more, a real life car would cost more, a real life hospital bill will cost more. There is so much that would cost more and someone accepted less. Why would I care they got a few more pennies?

    The settlement was inadequate for everyone, except those in the military, they at least got a minimum of $125,000.

    The banks couldn’t bilk the gov’t out of the funding for the homes they stole.

    I didn’t cash the check and would not have, it is inadequate.
    All people see is 80 million dollars, well suppose they paid 20 million of the 60 million who’s homes were stolen. What’s an extra $40 spread among them.

    I am watching old Ep’s of Kung Fu.
    There was a quote that was like this.
    People who lack discernment are like the roots of a tree, absorbing everything it’s roots touch whether it is beneficial or not.

    Bad paraphrase, but to even think there is a problem with an extra $40 from people who only took $300 is really not seeing the fact.

    Trespass Unwanted, Creator, Corporeal, Life, Free, Independent, State, In Jure Proprio, Jure Divino


Contribute to the discussion!

%d bloggers like this: