http://recorderstandard.com/2015/12/bank-of-america-smacked-with-foreclosure-fraud-lawsuits/
by Manuel Ortega
Although Bank of America (BoA), along with other big banks like Wells Fargo, Citibank, Ally/GMAC and JPMorgan Chase, recently reached a very favorable settlement of potential criminal fraud charges related to their mortgage lending practices, two recently unsealed civil fraud lawsuits against BoA reveal they may not be out of the woods just yet. Such whistleblower suits allow individuals, usually ex- employees, with knowledge of fraud committed against the federal government to bring suit on its behalf and collect a portion of any damages awarded. The federal government has until March 16 to decide whether to intervene in these suits on the side of the plaintiffs. Two such fraud suits filed against Bank of America shine a bright light on abuses in the mortgage industry that led to the 2007 housing crash and continued as late as 2011. Recorder Standard http://recorderstandard.com/2015/12/bank-of-america-smacked-with-foreclosure-fraud-lawsuits/
Filed under: foreclosure |
Delaware.gov | Text Only Governor | General Assembly | Courts | Elected Officials | State Agencies
Photo: State of Delaware Photo: Featured Delaware Photo
Department of State: Division of Corporations
Allowable Characters
HOME
About Agency
Secretary’s Letter
Newsroom
Frequent Questions
Related Links
Contact Us
Office Location
SERVICES
Pay Taxes
Bulk Tax Payment (alternative entity payment only)
File UCC’s
Delaware Laws Online
Name Reservation
Entity Search
Status
Validate Certificate
Customer Service Survey
INFORMATION
Corporate Forms
Corporate Fees
UCC Forms and Fees
Taxes
Expedited Services
Service of Process
Registered Agents
GetCorporate Status
Submitting a Request
How to Form a New Business Entity
Certifications, Apostilles & Authentication of Documents
Frequently Asked Questions
To retrieve information on a Delaware entity, Key in the name of the entity you are searching. The search results will return both active and inactive entities from our database. This is not an indication of the current status of an entity. The information provided in this application is real time and reflects the information on our database as of the date of the search. When the list of names is returned click the name and the information page will be returned.
The entity information provided on this website, free of charge, consists of the entity name, file number, incorporation/formation date, registered agent name, address, phone number and residency.
However, additional information can be obtained for a fee.
If you would like to order a Certificate of Status, Certified Copy of a filed document or a Plain Copy of same, please contact a Delaware online agent. Please click here.
For more information please read the Frequently Asked Questions page.
General Information Name Search
* Required Field
* Entity Name: * File Number:
gmacm
or
[This field is not case sensitive.]
Search
FILE NUMBER ENTITY NAME
3658935 G-MAC MARKETING, LLC
4555820 GMAC MODEL HOME FINANCE I, LLC
2874124 GMAC MODEL HOME FINANCE, INC.
4142191 GMAC MODEL HOME FINANCE, LLC
2784258 GMAC MORTGAGE ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
1011228 GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION
1015154 GMAC MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF IOWA
4188887 GMAC MORTGAGE GROUP LLC
2074804 GMAC MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
2089231 GMAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS LLC
3193516 GMAC MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS, INC.
4149099 GMAC MORTGAGE SECURITIES II, LLC
2089228 GMAC MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
4149107 GMAC MORTGAGE USA CORPORATION
2765927 GMAC MORTGAGE VENTURE II, INC.
4143873 GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
4159787 GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC OF TN
5139942 GMACM BORROWER LLC
5197596 GMACM BORROWER TRUST
2836622 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1997-1
2875180 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1998-1
3183815 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2000-HE1
3252553 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2000-HE2
3321757 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2000-HE4
3373937 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2001-HE1
3408774 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2001-HE2
3449257 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2001-HE3
3449703 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2001-HE4
3506782 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2002-HE1
3506442 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2002-HE2
3563119 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2002-HE3
3585331 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2002-HE4
3640428 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2003-HE1
3640427 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2003-HE2
3783664 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-HE1
3783682 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-HE2
3822942 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-HE3
3873656 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-HE4
3887996 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-HE5
3946397 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2005-HE1
3992970 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2005-HE2
4037789 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2005-HE3
4134443 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HE1
4183333 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HE2
4211903 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HE3
4226043 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HE4
4257587 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2006-HE5
4325169 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2007-HE1
4379636 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2007-HE2
4446495 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2007-HE3
3127363 GMACM HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 1999-2
3768332 GMACM HOME EQUITY NOTES 2004 VARIABLE FUNDING TRUST
3294555 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2000-CL1
3203619 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2000-HLTV1
3280740 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2000-HLTV2
3461936 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2001-CL1
3349583 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2001-HLTV1
3451356 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2001-HLTV2
3573116 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2002-HLTV1
3861088 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2004-HLTV1
4134377 GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-HLTV1
3100949 GMACM LOAN TRUST 1999-HLTV1
3308836 GMACM MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2000-HE3
3366952 GMACM MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-GH1
3507027 GMACM MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-GH1
3645181 GMACM MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2003-GH1
3743173 GMACM MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2003-GH2
3884711 GMACM MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2004-GH1
4840400 GMACM MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2010-1
5149946 GMACM REO LLC
2948643 GMACM REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1998-2
3057521 GMACM REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1999-1
To ensure everyone using the Division of Corporations search tools has the best experience possible, the Division strongly discourages the use of automated tools to search or mine data. We also discourage excessive and repeated searches that may have a negative impact on our systems and customer experience. Failure to use these tools in a responsible manner may result in the suspension of your access to utilize this service.
For help on a particular field click on the Field Tag to take you to the help area.
site map | about this site | contact
@ mn
It makes sense to point to a couple of articles much better written than my own clumsy attempts, which are entitled as:
Now UCC Me Now You Dont_ The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Ignores the UCC
Losing the Paper – Mortgage Assignments Note Transfers and Consumer Protection
@ mn
Addressing the reply to question of who is the TRUE CREDITOR:
If the “LINO” (Lender In Name Only) on the transaction instruments either purported to fund the originating transaction with its own monies, or in fact merely “table funded” the originating transaction with an immediate “flip” for downstream monies in the securitization transaction, either way, the LINO “sold” its’ interest(s), whatever that may be, vel non, to the downstream REMIC securitization transaction(s), to wit:
Nemo dat quod non habet, literally meaning “no one gives what he doesn’t have” is a legal rule, sometimes called the nemo dat rule, that states that the purchase of a possession from someone who has no ownership right to it also denies the purchaser any ownership title.
@ mn
I, too, wrestled for a very long time with the intersection of the Commercial Law (UCC’s Articles 3 & 9) and Property Law . Obviously I still combat how to cogently interpret and articulate that intersection of law, as do the courts.
The UCC itself is akin to a complex foreign language that is definitely a specialty practice within the law. Relevant here, following the MAKER’s execution of the TANGIBLE NOTE and lien instrument, the UCC is the operative law in the core context of this commerce activity by the deceitful CONDUIT ORIGINATOR: negotiable instruments, payment intangibles, and securitization transactions.
There is no disagreement that the boilerplate language in the TANGIBLE NOTE includes that it may be “sold” more than once. Here, the TANGIBLE NOTE was presumed to have been properly NEGOTIATED for VALUE through the chain of intermediaries in compliance with the UCC, “sold” multiple times and ostensibly transferred to a REMIC trust. Theoretically, securitization has not yet occurred. That TANGIBLE NOTE is supposed to be vaulted, but in at least some known instances it has been destroyed. Hence, the “lost note” affidavit(s) maneuver.
Now, behind the REMIC trust curtain the securitization transaction is conducted. Assuming the REMIC trust is the “holder” in possession of the TANGIBLE NOTE, it is not the NOTE that is securitized. What is securitized is the parts (tranches) of the PAYMENT INTANGIBLE, BIFURCATED from the TANGIBLE NOTE. The whole PAYMENT INTANGIBLE is further BIFURCATED into tranches (parts), and then “sold” through certificates to investors.
With these facts in mind, fundamental questions of Commercial Law arise on some core issues including, but not limited to:
(1) Who, what, where, when and why on the NEGOTIATION, DELIVERY and TRANSFER of a PERFECTED INTEREST(s) of, on the one hand the singular TANGIBLE NOTE, and on the other hand the multiple PAYMENT INTANGIBLE(s);
(2) Evidence of a PERFECTED security instrument in (1);
(3) (1) PETE authority under the UCC.
Respectfully, query “PAYMENT INTANGIBLE” for edification, and please continue to challenge and expand all of our collective cognition.
(a) this Agreement be and hereby
is a security agreement within the meaning of Article 9 of the Uniform
Commercial Code of any applicable jurisdiction;
The Servicer shall cause to be filed the UCC assignment and UCC
financing statement referred to in clause (II)(vii) and (x), respectively, of
the definition of Mortgage File. If any UCC assignment or amendment or UCC
financing statement, as applicable, is lost or returned unfiled to the Servicer
because of any defect therein, the Servicer shall prepare a substitute UCC
assignment or amendment or UCC financing statement, as applicable, or cure such
defect, and cause such UCC assignment or amendment or UCC financing statement,
as applicable, to be filed in accordance with this paragraph. In connection with
its servicing of Cooperative Loans, the Servicer will use its reasonable best
efforts to file timely continuation statements with regard to each financing
statement and assignment relating to Cooperative Loans as to which the related
Cooperative Apartment is located outside of the State of New York.
In connection with the assignment of any Mortgage Loan registered on the
MERS(R) System, the Servicer further agrees that it will cause, at the
Servicer’s own expense, as soon as practicable after the Closing Date, the
MERS(R) System to indicate that such MortgagE Loans have been assigned to the
Trustee in accordance with this Agreement for the benefit of the
Certificateholders by including (or deleting, in the case of Mortgage Loans
which are repurchased in accordance with this Agreement) in such computer files
(a) the specific code which identifies the Trustee as the assignee of such
Mortgage Loan and (b) the series specific code in the field “Pool Field” which
identifies the series of Certificates issued in connection with such Mortgage
Loans. The Servicer agrees that it will not alter the codes referenced in this
paragraph with respect to any Mortgage Loan during the term of this Agreement
unless and until such Mortgage Loan is repurchased in accordance with the terms
of this Agreement, and there is filed any financing statement or amendment
thereof necessary to comply with the New York Uniform Commercial Code or the
Uniform Commercial Code of any applicable jurisdiction.
(f) It is intended that the conveyance by the Company to the Trustee of the
Mortgage Loans as provided for in this Section 2.01 be construed as a sale by
the Company to the Trustee of the Mortgage Loans for the benefit of the
Certificateholders. Further, it is not intended that such conveyance be deemed
to be a grant of a security interest in the Mortgage Loans by the Company to the
Trustee to secure a debt or other obligation of the Company. However, if the
Mortgage Loans are held to be property of the Company or of the Seller, or if
for any reason this Agreement is held or deemed to create a security interest in
the Mortgage Loans, then it is intended that, (a) this Agreement be and hereby
is a security agreement within the meaning of Article 9 of the Uniform
Commercial Code of any applicable jurisdiction; (b) the conveyance provided for
in Section 2.01 shall be deemed to be, and hereby is, (1) a grant by the Company
to the Trustee of a security interest in all of the Company’s right, title and
interest, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, in and to the following: (A)
the Mortgage Loans, including (i) with respect to each Cooperative Loan, the
related Mortgage Note, Security Agreement, Assignment of Proprietary Lease,
Cooperative Stock Certificate and Cooperative Lease, (ii) with respect to each
Mortgage Loan other than a Cooperative Loan, the related Mortgage Note and
Mortgage, and (iii) any insurance policies and all other documents in the
related Mortgage File, (B) all amounts payable pursuant to the Mortgage Loans in
accordance with the terms thereof, (C) all proceeds of the conversion, voluntary
or involuntary, of the foregoing into cash, instruments, securities or other
property, including without limitation all amounts from time to time held or
invested in the Payment Account or the Custodial Account, whether in the form of
cash, instruments, securities or other property, (D) all accounts, general
intangibles, chattel paper, instruments, documents, money, deposit accounts,
goods, letters of credit, letter-of-credit rights, oil, gas, and other minerals,
and investment property consisting of, arising from or relating to any of the
foregoing, and (E) all proceeds of the foregoing, and (2) an assignment by the
Company to the Trustee of any security interest in any and all of the Seller’s
right (including the power to convey title thereto), title and interest, whether
now owned or hereafter acquired, in and to the property described in the
foregoing clauses (1)(A), (B), (C), (D) and (E) granted by the Seller to the
Company pursuant to the Purchase Agreement; (c) the possession by the Trustee,
the Custodian or any other agent of the Trustee of any of the foregoing property
shall be deemed to be possession by the secured party, or possession by a
purchaser or a person holding for the benefit of such secured party, for
purposes of perfecting the security interest pursuant to the Pennsylvania
Uniform Commercial Code and the Uniform Commercial Code of any other applicable
jurisdiction (including, without limitation, Sections 9-313 and 9-314 thereof);
and (d) notifications to persons holding such property, and acknowledgments,
receipts or confirmations from persons holding such property, shall be deemed
notifications to, or acknowledgments, receipts or confirmations from, securities
intermediaries, bailees or agents of, or persons holding for, the Trustee (as
applicable) for the purpose of perfecting such security interest under
applicable law.
The Company and, at the Company’s direction, GMACM and the Trustee
shall, to the extent consistent with this Agreement, take such reasonable
actions as may be necessary to ensure that, if this Agreement were determined to
create a security interest in the Mortgage Loans and the other property
described above, such security interest would be determined to be a perfected
security interest of first priority under applicable law and will be maintained
as such throughout the term of this Agreement. Without limiting the generality
of the foregoing, the Company shall prepare and deliver to the Trustee not less
than 15 days prior to any filing date and, the Trustee shall forward for filing,
in accordance with the Servicer’s instructions, or shall cause to be forwarded
for filing, at the expense of the Company, all filings necessary to maintain the
effectiveness of any original filings necessary under the Uniform Commercial
Code as in effect in any jurisdiction to perfect the Trustee’s security interest
in the Mortgage Loans, as evidenced by an Officer’s Certificate of the Company,
including without limitation (x) continuation statements, and (y) such other
statements as may be occasioned by (1) any change of name of the Seller, the
Company or the Trustee (such preparation and filing shall be at the expense of
the Trustee, if occasioned by a change in the Trustee’s name), (2) any change of
type or jurisdiction of organization of the Seller or the Company and (3) any
transfer of any interest of the Seller or the Company in any Mortgage Loan. The
Company shall file or cause to be filed the original filing necessary under the
Uniform Commercial Code to perfect the Trustee’s security interest in the
Mortgage Loans.
Section 2.02. Acceptance by Trustee.
The Trustee acknowledges that the Custodian, acting on behalf of the
Trustee, has received (subject to any exceptions noted in the custodian
certification described below) the Mortgage Notes and the Trustee declares that
it holds or will hold the assets included in the definition of “Trust Fund,” in
trust for the exclusive use and benefit of all present and future
Certificateholders.
The Trustee agrees, for the benefit of the Certificateholders, that
pursuant to the Custodial Agreement, the Custodian will review each Mortgage
Note and will execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, to
GMACM, the Trustee and the Servicer a custodian certification substantially in
the form annexed hereto as Exhibit M on or prior to the Closing Date. Pursuant
to the Custodial Agreement, in conducting such review, the Custodian is required
to ascertain whether the Mortgage Notes have been executed and received, and
whether the Mortgage Notes relate, determined on the basis of the original
principal balance and loan number, to the Mortgage Loans. Neither the Custodian
nor the Trustee shall be under any duty or obligation to inspect, review or
examine said documents, instruments, certificates or other papers to determine
that the same are genuine, enforceable or appropriate for the represented
purpose or that they have actually been recorded, or are in recordable form or
that they are other than what they purport to be on their face.
Reblogged this on California Freelance Paralegal.
I payed for a certified copy of my 8k from security and exchange, it came in. and I found this.
iv) such assignment is at the request of the borrower under the related
Mortgage Loan.
so were did we say this is ok, and were did we sign the request , for changing our mortgage s, and notes. by .25% ?? that is allot of money difference in
interest charges on 300,000 dollar mortgage. at lets say 6.75 that would mean about 400,485.94 now lets take 6.50 and that would be about,380,000.
that’s a big difference. more than 35.00 dollars, tila/respa
this would say that they changed the mortgages by .25 percent in interest rates, without our permission or knowledge,
this would also make a difference in the calculation for disclosures that needed to be given to homeowners, tila/respa.
they made changes to our mortgages and notes, by them changing the contract terms without out knowledge.
I would say they would be void, the borrower never sign the new mortgage and note stating the .25 % change in interest being charged.
no meeting of minds.
EXHIBIT K
FORM OF LENDER CERTIFICATION FOR ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE LOAN
_____, 20__
Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc.
8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard
Suite 250
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437
Wells Fargo Center
Sixth and Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479-0113
Attention: Corporate Trust Services–GMACM 2006-J1
Re: GMACM Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2006-J1 Assignment of Mortgage Loan
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is delivered to you in connection with the assignment
by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Trustee”) to (the “Lender”) of
(the “Mortgage Loan”) pursuant to Section 3.13(d) of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), dated as of February 27, 2006
among Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc., as seller (the “Company”), GMAC
Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, and the Trustee. All terms used herein and
not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement. The Lender hereby certifies, represents and warrants to,
and covenants with, the Servicer and the Trustee that:
(i) the Mortgage Loan is secured by Mortgaged Property located in a jurisdiction
in which an assignment in lieu of satisfaction is required to preserve lien
priority, minimize or avoid mortgage recording taxes or otherwise comply with,
or facilitate a refinancing under, the laws of such jurisdiction;
(ii) the substance of the assignment is, and is intended to be, a refinancing of
such Mortgage Loan and the form of the transaction is solely to comply with, or
facilitate the transaction under, such local laws;
(iii) the Mortgage Loan following the proposed assignment will be modified to
have a rate of interest at least 0.25 percent below or above the rate of
interest on such Mortgage Loan prior to such proposed assignment; and
(iv) such assignment is at the request of the borrower under the related
Mortgage Loan.
Very truly yours,
——————————————
——————————————
(Lender)
By:
————————-
Name
————————
Title
————————-
WHO IS THE LENDER
© 2015 Microsoft Terms Privacy & cookies Developers English (United States)
Thursday 24 December 2015
From Kalifornia:
>The issue(s) are:
>Who are the holder(s) of a PAYMENT INTANGIBLE?
What is a payment intangible, in law?
>Who are the holder(s) of the NOTE?
The plaintiffs making claim, according to local rules [varies by state]
>Who are the purported TRUE CREDITOR(s)?
The lender listed on the note, unless and until one can prove otherwise.
>Whether the holder(s) of a PAYMENT INTANGIBLE also holds a >perfected security interest in the LIEN?
See first Q, above.
>Whether the holder(s) of a PAYMENT INTANGIBLE have the authority >to enforce the LIEN?
Non-sequitur
>Does securitization of the PAYMENT INTANGIBLE further >BIFURCATE the security instrument such that it is a nullity?
Depends on what the definition of is is.
I have only read the info on this theme your provided, once, and I have
no feel on how to use this in court. None, and I am one willing to stretch
and make any argument.
We are now “missionaries” of a new order.
Trespass,
Define the terms and meanings… study
the difference in the cultures..
I’m with you! Now we’re learning to understand by engaging in the discipline of a religious scholar… just like studying “comparative religion,” reviewing the history of the development of the languages and the traditions of the many “different, sometimes competitive ‘players’.”
Now we just need credible access to the courthouse, the court rooms, and the judges chambers…. maybe even into the corridors of juristic learning?
Not being sarcastic… just wide eyes realistic!
Look for definitions
creditor, debtor, consumer, servicer.
Can’t assume it means what you think it means.
The definition section is where you begin, before reading any document with that much legalese.
When in doubt, grab a legal dictionary.
Word for word, you’ll find out it means something different from what is taught in school.
That’s why people have a hard time rescinding.
They think they are time barred, not realizing the clock has to start in order to reach a specific point to make them time barred.
But if people don’t want to read the definitions, they have made the decision, and no one else, they have made the decision to not rescind.
Do not blame a blogger, or someone in a post, or someone’s article, or anything. The finger points at us, and those committing the fraud will say ‘in some communication’ we are agreeing or participating in what they are doing to us, by not making certain things known, once we are aware of what ‘they’ are doing to us.
Trespass Unwanted, Creator, Corporeal, Life, Free, People, Independent, State, In Jure Proprio (in One’s own right), Jure Divino (by divine right)
@ djabelanger
Please proceed with caution. Although also securitized, the term “nontraditional mortgage” loan does not appear to encompass all securitized mortgages; rather:
“These mortgage products, herein referred to as nontraditional mortgage loans, include such products as “interest-only” mortgages where a borrower pays no loan principal for the first few years of the loan and “payment option” adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) where a borrower has flexible payment options with the potential for negative
amortization. [Footnote1]”
–
[Footnote1]
Interest-only and payment option ARMs are variations of conventional ARMs, hybrid ARMs, and fixed rate products. Refer to the Appendix for additional information on interest-only and payment option ARM loans. This guidance does not apply to reverse mortgages; home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”), other than as discussed in the Simultaneous Second-Lien Loans section; or fully amortizing residential mortgage loan products.
~~~~
Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product Risks
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Office of Thrift Supervision
National Credit Union Administration
GOT ALL THIS FROM THIS.
Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)]
0001068238-07-001257
Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default. BIG. READ ALL IN THAT SECTION. GO SLOW AND READ IT CAREFULLY.
THE AGREEMENTS
>
As described in this prospectus under “Introduction” and “Description of the
Securities—General,” each series of certificates will be issued under a pooling and servicing agreement
or trust agreement, as applicable, and each series of notes will be issued under an indenture, each as
described in that section. In the case of each series of notes, the provisions relating to the servicing
of the loans will be contained in the related servicing agreements. The following summaries describe
additional provisions common to each pooling and servicing agreement and trust agreement relating to a
series of certificates, and each indenture and servicing agreement relating to a series of notes.
Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default
Pooling and Servicing Agreement; Servicing Agreement
Events of default under the related pooling and servicing agreement or servicing agreement for
a series of securities will include:
o any failure by the servicer or master servicer to make a required deposit to the Custodial
Account or the Payment Account or, if the master servicer or servicer is the
paying agent, to distribute to the holders of any class of securities of that
series any required
86
chase Obligations
Some types of loans and classes of securities of any series, as specified in the accompanying
prospectus supplement, may be subject to a purchase obligation. The terms and conditions of each
purchase obligation, including the purchase price, timing and payment procedure, will be described in
the accompanying prospectus supplement. A purchase obligation for loans may apply to the loans or to the
related securities. Each purchase obligation may be a secured or unsecured obligation of its provider,
which may include a bank or other financial institution or an insurance
80
, the securityholders will bear
the loss.
class of certificates of a series may have the option to purchase from the trust any defaulted
loan after a specified period of delinquency. If a defaulted loan or REO Loan is not removed from the
trust prior to final liquidation, then, upon its final liquidation, if a loss is realized which is not
covered by any applicable form of credit enhancement or other insurance, the securityholders will bear
the loss. However, if a gain results from the final liquidation of an REO Loan which is not required by
law to be remitted to the related mortgagor, the master servicer or servicer will be entitled to retain
that gain as additional servicing compensation unless the accompanying prospectus supplement provides
otherwise.
Realization Upon Defaulted Loans
If a loan, including a contract secured by a lien on a mortgaged property, is in default, the
master servicer or servicer may take a variety of actions, including foreclosing on the mortgaged
property, writing off the principal balance of the loan as a bad debt, taking a deed in lieu of
foreclosure, accepting a short sale, permitting a short refinancing, arranging for a repayment plan,
capitalization of arrearages or modification as described above, or taking an unsecured note.
if an event of default as to the notes of any series at the time outstanding occurs and is
continuing, either the trustee, the credit enhancer, if applicable, or the holders of a majority of the
then aggregate outstanding amount of the notes of the series with the written consent of the credit
enhancer may declare the principal amount, or, if the notes of that series are accrual notes, that
portion of the principal amount as may be specified in the terms of that series, of all the notes of the
series to be due and payable immediately. That declaration may, under some circumstances, be rescinded
and annulled by the holders of a majority in aggregate outstanding amount of the related notes.
If, following an event of default for any series of notes, the notes of the series have been
declared to be due and payable, the trustee may, in its discretion, or, if directed in writing by the
credit enhancer, will, regardless of that acceleration, elect to maintain possession of the collateral
securing the notes of that series and to continue to apply payments on that collateral as if there had
been no declaration of acceleration if that collateral continues to provide sufficient funds for the
payment of principal of and interest on the notes of the series as they would have become due if there
had not been a declaration. In addition, the trustee may not sell or otherwise liquidate the collateral
securing the notes of a series following an event of default, unless:
o the holders of 100% of the then aggregate outstanding amount of the notes of the series consent
to that sale,
o the proceeds of the sale or liquidation are sufficient to pay in full the principal of and
accrued interest, due and unpaid, on the outstanding notes of the series, and to
reimburse the credit enhancer, if applicable, at the date of that sale, or
o the trustee determines that the collateral would not be sufficient on an ongoing basis to make
all payments on those notes as those payments would have become due if those notes
had not been declared due and payable, and the trustee obtains the consent of the
holders of 66 2/3% of the then aggregate outstanding amount of the notes of the
series and the credit enhancer, if applicable
https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8518.htm
best to read all in this.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The trust will hold separate pools of assets with separate classes of securities for each pool.
Securities backed by one pool do not have rights to the other pools.
hum
— TONIGHT —
Sorry for the Late gentle reminder – please make an appointment for yourself to join us for Episode [13] of “The Gallant Goose & Friends” on TalkShoe #139335 with your host, greg; TONIGHT, Wednesday evening at 6:45 PM Eastern.
Since Neil posted that he is skipping his weekly Thursday Night LIVING LIES – FORECLOSURE DEFENSE & ATTACK call until Jan 7, 2016, we’ll just discuss the Paatalo Articles and talk about current events and news and your own Foreclosure Defense experience…
IMPORTANT NOTE: Because Dec 24th and Dec 31st fall on Thursday, we will be “bumping” our call over to Wednesday for the next two weeks (Dec 23 & Dec 30)
Details follow:
1) Neil’s Living Lies Call at 6:00PM Eastern (347) 850-1260… on Blogtalk Radio (resumes 1/7/2016)
2) Our interactive self-help Q&A call, “The Gallant Goose & Friends” on TalkShoe – begins TONIGHT – WEDNESDAY night at 6:45PM Eastern
Call in at (724) 444-7444 (then use Call ID: 139335) then “1#” for guest and/or use your computer to blog/type at http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/139335
6:45 PM Eastern (for 60+ min)
[Our Calls and Chat Board are recorded for review and sharing…]
Please use the phone line TO SPEAK; ASK QUESTIONS AND CONTRIBUTE…
Note that computer access will ONLY allow you to hear and type into the blog (Not Speak)…
all are welcome!
if you; or one of your friends; would like to be added and receive email reminders of the call…please email the host at: [lawman@gmx.us] with the subject line: “please add me to the goose!”
If you would like to be REMOVED from the group…please email the host at: [lawman@gmx.us] with the subject line: “please pluck my goose”
thank you.
greg
The Rules continue existing industry practice by specifying that the depositor (often the sponsor or an affiliated intermediary that receives the pool assets and transfers them to the issuing entity) is the statutory “issuer” for purposes of signing the registration statement. As such, each of the depositor’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and a majority of its directors is required to sign the registration statement for the ABS offering. The same depositor will be considered a different statutory “issuer” in respect of each issuing entity and also in respect of its own securities.
https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8518.htm
so my agreement ,the mortgage and note, per se- that once the lender is payed as to the amount in the note, then my obligations to that agreement is done . so once the originator sells that note / mortgage to depositor for the the full amount of the note. my obligations to that lender is dead. gone. i owe them nothing. as they have been payed in full.
A creditor may terminate a loan or open-end credit agreement and accelerate the balance when the consumer fails to meet the repayment terms resulting in a default in payment under the agreement; a creditor may do so, however, only if the consumer actually fails to make payments resulting in a default in the agreement.
so if the consumer is note a party to the psa , as stated by the banks. the psa is the agreements with the partys. in that agreement.
so as all psa say. if the borrower does not pay any or all of the payments, then the servicer and trustee must pay the payments. as per agreement.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20060809a1.pdf
@ djabelanger
The issue(s) are:
Who are the holder(s) of a PAYMENT INTANGIBLE?
Who are the holder(s) of the NOTE?
Who are the purported TRUE CREDITOR(s)?
Whether the holder(s) of a PAYMENT INTANGIBLE also holds a perfected security interest in the LIEN?
Whether the holder(s) of a PAYMENT INTANGIBLE have the authority to enforce the LIEN?
Does securitization of the PAYMENT INTANGIBLE further BIFURCATE the security instrument such that it is a nullity?
Securitized Mortgage
Securitized Mortgage
A mortgage that is packaged into a mortgage-backed security (MBS). One mortgage may be securitized over several MBSs, and each MBS contains many securitized mortgages. A securitized mortgage gives the holder of the security, rather than the bank originating the loan, the right a claim on the principal and interest payments on that mortgage. Mortgages are securitized to remove them from a bank’s balance sheet (which reduces risk) and to improve its cash flow.
Consumer Protection Issues
While nontraditional mortgage loans provide flexibility for consumers, the Agencies are concerned that consumers may enter into these transactions without fully understanding the product terms. Nontraditional mortgage products have been advertised and promoted based on their affordability in the near term; that is, their lower initial monthly payments compared with traditional types of mortgages. In addition to apprising consumers of the benefits of nontraditional mortgage products, institutions should take appropriate steps to alert consumers to the risk of these products, including the likelihood of increased future payment obligations. This information should be provided in a timely manner–before disclosures may be required under the Truth in Lending Act or other laws–to assist the consumer in the product selection process.
Concerns and Objectives–More than traditional ARMs, mortgage products such as payment option ARMs and interest-only mortgages can carry a significant risk of payment shock and negative amortization that may not be fully understood by consumers. For example, consumer payment obligations may increase substantially at the end of an interest-only period or upon the “recast” of a payment option ARM. The magnitude of these payment increases may be affected by factors such as the expiration of promotional interest rates, increases in the interest rate index, and negative amortization. Negative amortization also results in lower levels of home equity as compared to a traditional amortizing mortgage product. When borrowers go to sell or refinance the property, they may find that negative amortization has substantially reduced or eliminated their equity in it even when the property has appreciated. The concern that consumers may not fully understand these products would be exacerbated by marketing and promotional practices that emphasize potential benefits without also providing clear and balanced information about material risks.
In light of these considerations, communications with consumers, including advertisements, oral statements, promotional materials, and monthly statements, should provide clear and balanced information about the relative benefits and risks of these products, including the risk of payment shock and the risk of negative amortization. Clear, balanced, and timely communication to consumers of the risks of these products will provide consumers with useful information at crucial decision-making points, such as when they are shopping for loans or deciding which monthly payment amount to make. Such communication should help minimize potential consumer confusion and complaints, foster good customer relations, and reduce legal and other risks to the institution.
Legal Risks–Institutions that offer nontraditional mortgage products must ensure that they do so in a manner that complies with all applicable laws and regulations. With respect to the disclosures and other information provided to consumers, applicable laws and regulations include the following:
• Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and its implementing regulation, Regulation Z.
• Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). TILA and Regulation Z contain rules governing disclosures that institutions must provide for closed-end mortgages in advertisements, with an application,15 before loan consummation, and when interest rates change. Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices.16
Other Federal laws, including the fair lending laws and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), also apply to these transactions. Moreover, the Agencies note that the sale or securitization of a loan may not affect an institution’s potential liability for violations of TILA, RESPA, the FTC Act, or other laws in connection with its origination of the loan. State laws, including laws regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices, also may apply.
Recommended Practices
Recommended practices for addressing the risks raised by nontraditional mortgage products include the following:17
Communications with Consumers–When promoting or describing nontraditional mortgage products, institutions should provide consumers with information that is designed to help them make informed decisions when selecting and using these products. Meeting this objective requires appropriate attention to the timing, content, and clarity of information presented to consumers. Thus, institutions should provide consumers with information at a time that will help consumers select products and choose among payment options. For example, institutions should offer clear and balanced product descriptions when a consumer is shopping for a mortgage–such as when the consumer makes an inquiry to the institution about a mortgage product and receives information about nontraditional mortgage products, or when marketing relating to nontraditional mortgage products is provided by the institution to the consumer–not just upon the submission of an application or at consummation.18 The provisions of such information would serve as an important supplement to the disclosures currently required under TILA and Regulation Z or other laws.19
Promotional Materials and Product Descriptions. Promotional materials and other product descriptions should provide information about the costs, terms, features, and risks of nontraditional mortgages that can assist consumers in their product selection decisions, including information about the matters discussed below.
• Payment Shock. Institutions should apprise consumers of potential increases in payment obligations for these products, including circumstances in which interest rates or negative amortization reach a contractual limit. For example, product descriptions could state the maximum monthly payment a consumer would be required to pay under a hypothetical loan example once amortizing payments are required and the interest rate and negative amortization caps have been reached.20 Such information also could describe when structural payment changes will occur (e.g., when introductory rates expire, or when amortizing payments are required), and what the new payment amount would be or how it would be calculated. As applicable, these descriptions could indicate that a higher payment may be required at other points in time due to factors such as negative amortization or increases in the interest rate index.
• Negative Amortization. When negative amortization is possible under the terms of a nontraditional mortgage product, consumers should be apprised of the potential for increasing principal balances and decreasing home equity, as well as other potential adverse consequences of negative amortization. For example, product descriptions should disclose the effect of negative amortization on loan balances and home equity, and could describe the potential consequences to the consumer of making minimum payments that cause the loan to negatively amortize. (One possible consequence is that it could be more difficult to refinance the loan or to obtain cash upon a sale of the home).
• Prepayment Penalties. If the institution may impose a penalty in the event that the consumer prepays the mortgage, consumers should be alerted to this fact and to the need to ask the lender about the amount of any such penalty.21
• Cost of Reduced Documentation Loans. If an institution offers both reduced and full documentation loan programs and there is a pricing premium attached to the reduced documentation program, consumers should be alerted to this fact.
Monthly Statements on Payment Option ARMs. Monthly statements that are provided to consumers on payment option ARMs should provide information that enables consumers to make informed payment choices, including an explanation of each payment option available and the impact of that choice on loan balances. For example, the monthly payment statement should contain an explanation, as applicable, next to the minimum payment amount that making this payment would result in an increase to the consumer’s outstanding loan balance. Payment statements also could provide the consumer’s current loan balance, what portion of the consumer’s previous payment was allocated to principal and to interest, and, if applicable, the amount by which the principal balance increased. Institutions should avoid leading payment option ARM borrowers to select a non-amortizing or negatively-amortizing payment (for example, through the format or content of monthly statements).
Practices to Avoid. Institutions also should avoid practices that obscure significant risks to the consumer. For example, if an institution advertises or promotes a nontraditional mortgage by emphasizing the comparatively lower initial payments permitted for these loans, the institution also should provide clear and comparably prominent information alerting the consumer to the risks. Such information should explain, as relevant, that these payment amounts will increase, that a balloon payment may be due, and that the loan balance will not decrease and may even increase due to the deferral of interest and/or principal payments. Similarly, institutions should avoid promoting payment patterns that are structurally unlikely to occur.22 Such practices could raise legal and other risks for institutions, as described more fully above.
hile third-party loan sales can transfer a portion of the credit risk, an institution remains exposed to reputation risk when credit losses on sold mortgage loans or securitization transactions exceed expectations. As a result, an institution may determine that it is necessary to repurchase defaulted mortgages to protect its reputation and maintain access to the markets. In the agencies’ view, the repurchase of mortgage loans beyond the selling institution’s contractual obligation is implicit recourse. Under the agencies’ risk-based capital rules, a repurchasing institution would be required to maintain risk-based capital against the entire pool or securitization.13 Institutions should familiarize themselves with these guidelines before deciding to support mortgage loan pools or buying back loans in default.
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/5000-5150.html
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/braunstein20070327a.htm