For further information please call 954-495-9867 or 520-405-1688
=========================
Just to piggy back on my article on Friday, it is awards like this that should give judges pause before they consider the documents presented by the banks in court to be worthy of any presumptions of authenticity, trustworthiness or credibility.
And this is a case where the doctrine of UNCLEAN HANDS justified denying the bank the option of the equitable remedy of foreclosure.
If we are dealing with parties who are known to have engaged in patterns of fraudulent conduct, why should they be presumed to be on the right side of of the evidentiary rules? On the contrary, the rules of evidence are intended to result in an efficient rendition of the truth — not to be used for fraudulent pranksters stealing trillions of dollars in money and property.
Filed under: foreclosure |
Christine, isn’t sad how delusional Mr. Belanger and some of these other poor souls, who’ve drank the Kool-Aid served up by Garfield.
The consensus of those knowledgeable in these matters believe Garfield has single-handily caused more homeowners to lose their homes than all of the other pretender defenders combined. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/03/21/mortgage-fraud-examiners-warns/
You can, or I will, do Belanger a favor and give them the 800 # for Allied Moving Vans. That’s the least we can do, when he gets booted.
Christine, please stop it right now, is it just that you dont want the truth to get out, or are you that stupid, with no common sense.
the law of the land is done, and now we the people have been validated by the supreme court, oh wait, THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, THE HIGHEST COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NO AND I REPEAT NO OTHER COURT, OR JUDGE, FEDERAL OR STATE, CAN CHANGE WHAT THE SUPREME COURT UNANIMOUSLY SAID.
THAT ALL JUDGES IN THIS COUNTRY HAVE BEEN DEAD WRONG, AND WITH THAT SAID. THE BANKS HAVE TO.
WITH IN 20 DAYS THE BANK,SERVICER,LAWYER FOR THEM, TRUSTEE,TRUSTS.
MUST FILE IN 20 DAYS IF THEY DISAGREE WITH THE LETTER OF RESCISSION. PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION.
NOW THE HOME OWNER HAS ONE YR TO FILE WITH THE COURTS TO GET THE BANKS/SERVICERS,TRUSTEE TRUST TO DO WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO BY OPERATION OF LAW,
PAY ALL MONEY BACK TO HOMEOWNER..
AND THEY CANT SAY A THING, AS THERE RIGHTS FOR NOT FILLING IN THAT 20 DAY PERIOD. TO ARGUE ANYTHING IS GONE, NO DEFENSES. NADA,CAPUT,GONE,BUY BUY, SORRY.
THE ONLY THING THE JUDGE CAN DO IS INFORCE THE RESCISSION FOR THE HOMEOWNER AT THAT POINT, AS THEY DID NOT DENY THE RESCISSION NOTICE.
AND BY THE WAY, THIS IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF THE LOAN WAS 10 15 YRS AGO, AS THEY NOW CAN NOT IF THEY DONT FILE IN 20 DAYS, SAY THE STATUE OF LIMITATION IS GONE. THEY CANT BRING UP ANY DEFENSE. NOTHING.
SO ROCK,CHRISTINE, BITE ME. AND ONCE I HAVE THAT PILE OF CASH ON MY BED, I WILL POST IT ON HERE TO SHOW YOU. AM RIGHT.
4 MARCH 2015, IN MAIL, THAT GIVES THEM UNTIL 31 MARCH TO FILE ANYTHING. JUST A FEW DAY AWAY. AM REALLY HOPING THEY DO. BECAUSE OF ALL THE DOC’S I HAVE, SHOWING ALL THE FRAUD.
Ian,
Contact me. cbrightlife@aol.com
Christine- answers to your questions- no, no, no, Aand yes. All help gladly appreciated!
And Ian,
If “muddling along” is how you want to play it, you will eventually lose. It’s not a threat, it’s a promise. You DO NOT muddle along with banks. At some point, you need to decide who is the boss. When you do, let me know and I’ll tell you how to play your cards smartly.
Ian,
When you say “I’ve fallen behind, caught up, falling behind”, did it occur to you to look at the accounting each time? Do you have all your statements, NODs, pay out, etc? Have you looked for accounting discrepancies ($20.00 of unexplained discrepancy is enough to attack in court)?
Why are you wasting your time here chasing bubbles when you could be in court attacking (and thus being relieved of paying until you have answers and a resolution)?
I believe you did ask “Where are the wins” and I can probably prove it very soon.
Christine-
I never asked that question. I’m muddling along, paying my mortgages, falling behind, catching up, falling behind, etc. when you call behind, you are open to all the tricks the servicers pull. I’m more concerned with the blatant arrogance and illegality of the whole thing. And I empathize with those who have been fraudclosed, yet unbelieveably have kept their family together and forged ahead, having been denied due process. Especially at the hands of the judges on florida’s “rocket docket” staffed by senile, imbecilic judges who have ce out of retirement to kick homeowners to the curb while rewarding the financial predators and sociopaths who practice their demonic agenda without a care in the world.
That’s all.
Well Ian.
When you get enough truth from here to go out and WIN something, let me know. If I recall, you were among the most vocal ones to ask, two years ago: “Where are the wins?” Did you get your answer? And have you won anything yet?
Christine- as the entire truth about the extent of this fraud has yet to come out, I think that this site plays an important role in encouraging dialog. Is it 100% accurate? Nope. Is it timely? Not that timely. Is it predicated on unassailable or proven law? Not entirely.
But does it encourage or even provoke extreme reactions ? Yes!
That’s why I like it.
NPV
Cheap shot. You know damn well Rock is right about foreclosure and, besides, you also know it’s become such an irrelevance in the worldwide scheme of things that the entire Livinglies site has become an obsolete absurdity.
NPV, your reply speaks volumes. Well said.
hello
Again, attacking the contract is the ONLY proven methodology to compensate homeowners.
http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/prnewswire/press_releases/Georgia/2014/01/07/MN41655?ana=prnews