If it’s Bosco It’s Bad: Judge Curly Rips Into Tiffany Bosco in this Recording

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

COMBO Title and Securitization Search, Report, Documents, Analysis & Commentary GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE

LISTEN HERE JUDGE CURLEY RIPS INTO TIFFANY AND BOSCO FOR FRAUDULENT PRACTICES

WHY ISN’T BOSCO IN JAIL?

 

After years of reports of self-dealing, in-house robo-signing and outright lying in Court, Tiffany and Bosco is coming under the scrutiny of Judges and law enforcement. I have received dozens of uncorroborated reports about Tiffany and Bosco, telling me that Bosco utilized his secretary and his father as straw-men in friendly transactions that resulted in Bosco taking ownership of a house that never should have been foreclosed in the first place.

The practice of allowing the bid to slip quietly to friends has, according to all reports, been endemic to the entire foreclosure scenario. Since the Banks are not actually losing any money on these deals (having used investors money), they are allowing some properties to go to preferred people thus allowing a person to pick up a house that originally sold for $600,000 for as little as $40,000. I have personally seen US Bank fight tooth and nail for property that is of dubious value — except to the neighbor nearby who has wanted to grab it for years. I have no proof, but the deals out there probably include sharing fees and expenses of litigation and potentially contracts to sell the property to “friends of the bank” long before the foreclosure or long before the litigation is over.

To those who have received such benefits I would say, besides shame on you, that you are in a position where you could be liable for what you have done. You didn’t just buy a piece of property. You entered into a conspiracy to deprive a homeowner of their rightful home.

55 Responses

  1. to Gary H

    I think the problem is, if you show some judges a black paper, the title companies knowing how they deal in kickbacks, bribes, networks can get a judge to say the paper is white.

  2. to Gary H

    My situation is that after going back to NYSC with motions to vacate void judgments ab initio
    (signed when the case Marilyn Lane v. Astoria Federal Successor in Interest to Fidelity NY FSB was under Federal Jurisdiction)

    and Mr Arthur Walsh the Attorney for Astoria Federal looking at the dates and seeing they never owned them when their old attorneys MJRF auctioned them to straw buyers , stated Its indemnify, Indemnify Indemnify.

    We are stepping aside and the Title attorneys are stepping in.

    Frank P Malone of Fidelity National Title
    and David K Fiveson of Coronet Title
    DID NOT WANT TO INDEMNIFY THE FORGED DEEDS THEY KNOWINGLY INSURED and told Judge Schlesinger
    WE HAVE EQUITY And she looked over her glasses toward me
    and said doesn’t look good for you
    guess she thought being pro se I wouldn’t understand that conversation.)

    FORGED DEEDS CONVEY NO TITLE, NO EQUITY, NADA.

    Noticeable absent from her decision was the United Stated Supreme Court case Elliot v. Piersol , that I brought my motion pursuant to.

    She took the bribe and refused to uphold her oath and ruled against
    the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and the law of the Land in Elliot v. Piersol.

    Judge Schlesinger and the Appellate Opinion both look like LPS DOCX documents, they lie on the facts and change the dates.

    My is a very simple case but when you get a corrupt Judge and title attorneys that pay bribes, the facts and the law carry no weight.

  3. @Marilyn Lane,

    When you are denied the ability to review the Title documents pertaining to any real property “held” by said Title Company, this is where the REAL FIGHT begins.

    We all know the “lender / originator” in any DOT is false. If Title Documents were to be disclosed in a Quiet Title Action, this whole issue of mortage securitization would fall apart.

    There are a number of “keys” here which will open doors, regardless if or of a position of pro-per / se representation in Court.

    May I suggest finding your PSA Agreement, the Clouds on Title are beyond “telling”…..this is why I noted what I said. The Assignments are bogus / flawed and CANNOT be “corrected” under any circumstance by or of LPS / CRC or the embodyment of other “foreclosure mills” in existance today.

    Wall Street continues to purport a facade of “legality”…..GO AFTER THE TITLE COMPANY!

  4. We need more real live whistleblowers. There has to be a bunch of them out there. We are waiting and listening.

  5. to Gary H

    I wrote a simple letter to William P Foley CEO of Fidelity National Title “what went wrong at Fidelity National Title that your NY attorney Thomas P Malone finds himself fighting for a Forged Deed?”

    Fidelity’s answer to me was “…it is proper to fight …”

    What other answer could one expect from a company where
    Foley who was Chairman of Lender Processing Service,.
    when the LPS DOCX fraud unraveled., quickly retired.

    Talk about rats deserting a sinking ship.

  6. One more thing…..

    In any credit bid made upon foreclosure by the “foreclosing BANK / Servicer”, MORTGAGE EQUITY IS PLACED ON THEIR BALANCE SHEETS which “they” DO NOT OWN!

  7. @ANONYMOUS, glad to see you posting again.

    Your comments have been instrumental in me reading and understanding my entire PSA agreement. Focusing on “chain of title” I’ve found that If your loan is Securitized chances are the “Chain of Title” is BROKEN and Cannot be Repaired.

    From further research I’ve found that a “Trust Account or Trust” is in essence a Pass Through Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) that benefits in a “tax free environment or status” under NEW YORK TRUST LAW and CANNOT own or have ANY BENEFICIAL Right of OWNERSHIP to ANY MORTGAGE THAT IS SECURITIZED.

    The idea of an “investor” is a false, the investor bought “cetificates” based on a “collateral file” held in the hands of an unknown party…..I know who this party is in my case…..which shields said party from any risk. Pass-through trading risk is “passed” to the certificate holders of XYZ Trust which DO NOT OWN or have any part thereto any Mortgage and are NOT the legal holders of anything other than the FUBAR certificates they purchased!

    Love this comment…..”Security investors??? They have gotten their money back — except — they want more”.

    If anyone wants to find out information regarding TITLE, first look to your DOT, then go to your County Recording Office and find everything on file and READ IT, then contact your TITLE COMPANY and ask for Escrow Instructions, Wire Transfers and Warehouse Lines of Credit.

    Guess what, I contacted my Title Company and recieved a letter back from FIDELITY NATIONAL LAW GROUP, and they refused to release this information, “without authorization from each party to the transaction or a properly issued subpeona”.

    What kind of BS is this…..I find it very TELLING!

  8. @tnharry

    When speed over accuracy was required, there should have been a big red flag not only for you but for everyone else. You should have known, sooner than later. At what point did you figure it out and how long did you stay after you knew? My inquirying mind really wants to know how one feels about themselves when you knowingly let someone loose their home to fraud? This crap about they didn’t make their payments is just that crap. What was so hard about following the law? Are you willing to answer that? I am from a non-judicial state and you can bet robo-signing goes on here. I have he docs to prove it.

    After reading some of your posts, I had a strong feeling foreclosure mill thinking was present. So are you here to help or what? Are you willing to let the people on this site, who really need the help, know the crap these mills are pulling? What do you say?

  9. “Investor” lawsuits??? First, let us identify the CURRENT investors — that is, the ones who own collection rights to debt that is actually – unsecured. .

    Funding??? You do not fund transfer of collection rights. The “investors” were/are the purchasers of the collection rights from onset — and purchased dirt cheap (was never a mortgage).

    Security investors??? They have gotten their money back — except — they want more.

    Address this, Neil, you still have not.

    Borrowers — where are the borrower class actions????

    Attorneys??? Only a few who “get it.”

    Those still looking to benefit from the fraud??? Lurking.

  10. @ tnharry,

    You wrote:

    “(at the FC mill)…..i was a peon….”

    Then later you graduated to accessory and accomplice?

  11. Quick note —-

    IT is not US Bank “fighting tooth and nail” —- it is someone falsely using the trustee name.

    Time for US Bank to expose the fraud.

  12. @ TN…..”whatever Gary. i wish i could sleep in a bed of unicorn feathers too. McDonalds preys on poor people with their value menu. Hostess preys on fat people. Apple preys on people willing to pay more for their label. You can find a victim everywhere if you look hard enough. And you can be a victim too if you want.

    Next week I’ll admit my mother is Linda Green and my uncle is Angelo Mozilo”

    As an Attorney, that statement really shows the “principle and integrity” on your part. I did not know unicorns had “feathers”…..Huh? Explain!???

    Mickey D’s serves good “fast food”, Hostess, damn I love the “cupcakes”, Apple, provides a product of choice as do the rest of the above…..

    YOU WORKED FOR A FORECLOSURE MILL ADMITTINGLY….. good grief Charlie Brown, where is the “substance, principle and integrity herein “?

    As to “The “Whatever” side, TN, my a$$…..neat way to redirect an argument!

  13. i will tell you this – the clients then (and still now i’m sure) preferred speed over accuracy. and they were okay with the occasional screwup so long as 99 others went through as fast as they could go

  14. extent of the fraud is hard to say, because i really don’t think anyone knew all of the stuff that’s taken for granted on this site several years ago. we were nonjudicial, so robo-signing and affidavits were non-issues. and it’s only been relatively recently that i really started to get the whole securitization issues. so no, i’d have to say no. i was a peon, so maybe it was there all along and i didn’t see it. some things now, given the benefit of time, experience, and more knowledge seem inappropriate

  15. tn—just wondering…when you worked at the “foreclosure mill”, were you aware of the extent of the fraud? Please be totally honest…

  16. whatever Gary. i wish i could sleep in a bed of unicorn feathers too. McDonalds preys on poor people with their value menu. Hostess preys on fat people. Apple preys on people willing to pay more for their label. You can find a victim everywhere if you look hard enough. And you can be a victim too if you want.

    Next week I’ll admit my mother is Linda Green and my uncle is Angelo Mozilo

  17. @TN…..”I worked defense several years, still take a pro bono case or two when I can, [B]I worked in a fc mill[/B] for a few years and have lately been working for smaller companies. I’ve represented all the big banks talked about here daily”

    I look at this from a standpoint of principle…..why work for a company that preys on others

  18. e.tolle—you just made me crack up! 😉

  19. :'( I just choked on my popcorn and soda came out my nose. This is quite the thread!

  20. New Countrywide Lawsuit For Bank Of America

    07/29/11 6:37PM ET AP

    “NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp. is facing a new lawsuit filed by a group of shareholders of mortgage giant Countrywide Financial Corp., which the bank bought in 2008.

    The group of investors, which include BlackRock funds, T. Rowe Price Group Inc., TIAA-CREF and several pension funds including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System had earlier rejected a $624 million settlement struck last year deal, saying the terms were inadequate. The lawsuit accused Countrywide of misleading shareholders about its finances and lending practices.

    Blair Nicholas, a partner at the law firm Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, representing the investors said they will present their claims before a jury. Bank of America spokesman Lawrence Grayson said: “We intend to vigorously defend these claims.”

  21. I thought that only in the car business no one is entitled to make a profit. Now it’s applied to attorneys.

    One cannot work more than one channel of trade? I always asked a prospective attorney if they had any conflicts of interest, FIRST.

    I don’t understand the animosity. Really people.

    like I said, ignore the ignorant.

  22. to tn harry

    what made you post this comment to me?
    tnharry, on July 29, 2011 at 11:30 am said:

    @marilyn – the more you share your facts the more it appears that there may not have been a usurping of the federal jurisdiction by the state court. if it was remanded, the state court could act.

    I assume it was what I posted to Nabdulla about 45 minutes before
    that got your attention. I clearly outlined the dates I was under Federal Jurisdiction. May 8 1997 thru July 29 1997

    What are you eating?

  23. To tnharry

    If I was under Federal Court jurisdiction
    from May 8 1997 thru July 29 1997,
    what date do you think it was remanded?

    Reading from the Federal docket it says:

    Order, the action is remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York (entry date 07/29/97)

  24. What date was the remand entered? Youve been sparse with salient facts and you attack me?

  25. To tnharry

    You got it wrong. Pay attention to the facts.

    The case was under Federal Jurisdiction for almost three months.

    May 8 1997 thru July 29 1997

    The State Court Judge signed the Judgments on June 30 1997
    without authority. Anything the State court proceeded with before remand is a nullity.

    The corrupt attorney Timothy Rooney of MJRF and the corrupt referee Penny Stark auctioned off the two properties to straw buyers with these void ab initio judgments.

    I told these crooks you cannot auctions off my properties with these invalid judgments and Timothy Rooney replied “who is going to stop us?”

    If you don’t know that a court has to have jurisdiction when they sign a judgment , you better find another business.

    Do you know it is AFTER REMAND that the state court has to do the judgments?- not while the case is in tact in Federal Court.

    Did your mother have trouble with you???

  26. Marilyn – you specifically said in your post it was remanded. If it was, then state court could act. If not, then judgment is void. Your facts seem to be in a constant state of flux

  27. Congrats Gary for finding and posting the truth about me. Oh wait, that was posted from my own comment…

    I wasn’t aware we lived in a world where everything exists solely as a charity to benefit Gary and no one makes a profit. Grow up.

    I worked defense several years, still take a pro bono case or two when I can, I worked in a fc mill for a few years and have lately been working for smaller companies. I’ve represented all the big banks talked about here daily. Gary, if you dont want to hear my perspective, then that won’t bother me. But really, get a grip. Listen to someone willing to share actual experience or listen to others rant and rave. Doesn’t matter to me

  28. […] Read More: If it’s Bosco It’s Bad: Judge Curly Rips Into Tiffany Bosco in this Recording […]

  29. Ah hell tnharry,

    Dog-gone-it let the truth be known to all…..

    “@tnharry, on June 6, 2011 at 8:08 am said:”

    …..” I don’t work for a mortgage bank. I am an attorney and have represented both banks and homeowners on both sides of these issues. That’s why I tend to play both sides of the fence and do the devil’s advocate thing when the conversation starts to go too far over in one direction”.

    Hummm, playing both sides of the fence does tend to place your position of being an “attorney” into the category of “sleaze-bag” out to glean information for…..what purpose, and on who’s behalf?

    Gee, could it be that heck, “each side of that fence has a dollar on it waiting to be pocketed and, your “devils advocate” principles apply to BOTH SIDES”?

    This is Total Bull $hit on your part and shows your true colors…..you advocate nothing but your pocket-book. TN you are exactly the Attorney I do not want standing before any court representing me…..”hell you made your dollar” regardless of the side you represent, right?

    If you are able to provide substantive information to this forum, ahhh, as an Attorney, do so and quit bitching to others here.

    Let me see if I can offer something…..wait, I’ll back-up for a moment and see what the position of the other side is…..oh $hit, TN you have NO SIDE, that you wish to concentrate on, let the dollars Roll!

  30. […] Livinglies’s Weblog Filed Under: Foreclosure Law News, Foreclosure News Tagged With: crisis, foreclosure, […]

  31. THANK YOU BRIAN DAVIES for posting the scribd link!!!

    I have IndyMac, One West, and Deutsche Bank (in California),—so I read your docs with bated breath!

    Excellent explanation of the convoluted fraud—wow…

  32. marilyn lane, when dealing with bankers, remember that they believe they’re not only entitled to their own opinions, but to their own facts as well. It’s a hard row to hoe.

  33. Davies V. Deutsche Bank BAP Case No. 11-1221
    Davies Reply Brief filed 07/29/2011
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/61235368/Davies-v-Deutsche-Bank-Appelant-Reply-Brief-Davies-BAP-Case-No-11-1221

    Don’t give up before the miracle happens.

  34. Again to tnharry
    A state court can act after remand. It takesup where it left off, but anything done by a State Court while it is under Federal Jurisdiction and before remand is Void ab initio

    A judgment is either Valid or invalid. It is not both.

    Who do you work for? I can’t help but think you are a plant on this site.

  35. to tnharrry
    quit making up your rendition of the law.

  36. to tnharry-

    Since 1882 the law for PETITION

    Accordingly, in Steamship v. Tugman 106 U.s. 118 122
    with the filing of the PETITION in Federal Court and the filing of the Copy in State Court, State Jurisdiction absolutely ceases and Federal Jurisdiction attaches, if and till the case is remanded by the Federal Court.

    If this illegal ruling stands it destroys The Supremacy Clause of our Constitution and the March 3rd, 1875 Act of Congress which states: It was the duty of the State Court to accept a Petition and PROCEED NO FURTHER IN SUCH SUIT c137, sECT. PT 3 p 470.
    The Record vested the Federal Court with complete jurisdiction.

  37. hey, harry, got a minute? need some help. would like to talk to you if possible. usedkarguy@yahoo.com. Thanks.

  38. The Earl hearings are worth listening to – every minute of them. Hearing Number one is 58 minutes, number two is 38 minutes. Listen carefully to the Judge in case # one and what she has to say about the trustees actions. Riveting.

  39. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

    Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible

    BUT YET I AM THE ONE LIVING OUT OF THE STORAGE UNIT NOT one of these 545 people who created this mess. My day is not doen until some dirty ass bastard goes to jail !

  40. Apologies. The link I first provided Neil was not set up for streaming audio. I fixed the problem my moving the files to a Media Server.

    Although you can stream them, it’s better to simply save the file but either way works.

    Here are links to BOTH of the Earl BK hearings. There should be more to follow:

    http://205.178.152.122/1692581/earlcase.wma

    http://205.178.152.122/1692581/earlcase2.wma

  41. One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

    Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

  42. Yep my neighborhood has been devalued by 65% . There were 82 homes, in th e community. We are more than $ 200,000 upside down or under water Now there are less than 6 original owners. Now the Obama plan is to kick the innocent to the curb or make us pay for the crimes committed by others. I refuse. Soon I will be living out of a storage unit. At least I can take a shower in the gym down the street. Hopefully Phill Grahm, Clinton and their Wall Street gang have fun in their comfortable homes. What a bunch of dirty SOBs

  43. The link worked this morning

  44. @carie – it was an apparently unsuccessful attempt at levity

    @marilyn – the more you share your facts the more it appears that there may not have been a usurping of the federal jurisdiction by the state court. if it was remanded, the state court could act.

  45. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/29/recession-was-worse-than-previously-though_n_913070.html

    THE RESULT OF UNPRECEDENTED MASSIVE FRAUD ON ALL LEVELS.

  46. Methinks you protest too much…hmmmmm….wonder why….

  47. Why art thou so grumpy all the time, tn?

  48. to Nabdulla

    thanks for your interest and concern. I for one appreciate when
    any one stands up for our protections under our great US Constitution.
    I would not trample on Judge Alice Schlesingers reputation or rights had it not been that I personally witnessed her arrogance in refusing to uphold her judicial oath and follow the ruling on the issue of Jurisdiction and Void Judgments by the US Supreme Court in the case of Elliot v. Piersol.

    In 2008 I sought two orders to show cause to Mark vacated two void Judgments ab initio of June 30, 1997 for lack of Jurisdiction of NY Supreme Court , pursuant to Elliot v. Piersol. which states:

    ” Under Federal Law which is applicable to all States, the US Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable but simply void and form no bar to recovery sought, even prior to reversal in opposition
    They constitute no justification and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentence are considered in law as trespassers. ”

    Re: Astoria Federal S & L/Successor in Interest to Fidelity NY FSB (from May 8, 1997 thru July 29 1997 this case was under Federal Jurisdiction under Federal Questions stemming from Fidelity hiding four mortgage checks in order to fake a default , accelerate, and foreclose)

    At the first hear in 2008 in NYSC attended by Mr. Arthur Walsh of O’Reilly, Marsh & Corteselli and me, Judge Schlesinger stated
    Why would the Federal Court have sent this case back to State Court.

    The Banks new attorneys looking at the dates apparently saw they never owned my two properties when corrupt Timothy Rooney of MJRF auctioned them off to straw buyers and the hearing ended with Mr. Walsh stating “Its indemnify Indemnify Indemniny – we are stepping aside and the title companies are stepping in”.

    At the second hearing Thomas P Malone of Fidelity National Title and David K Fiveson of Coronet Title did not want to indemnify and wanted to be intervenors instead and told Judge Schlesinger “we have Equity” and the only equity they were speaking of for a forged deed is money under the table for Judge Schlesinger and she ruled against the Supremacy clause and the case of Elliot v. Piersol.

    The woman is a corrupt Judge.

  49. @usedkarguy – how dare you talk badly about neil’s audio link like that. Neil is a gentleman and a scholar

  50. @ marilyn lane

    I also live in NY, Kings County. Just finished a speed read of Elliott v. Lessee of Piersol, 26 U.S. 328 (1828).

    Will you kindly give me your nutshell reconciliation of it’s holding to your situation. Thank-You.

    Also, please be VERY CAREFUL when attacking a person reputation. You could be subjecting them to injustices they don’t deserve. To accuse a Judge of taking a bribe is a very SERIOUS accusation. If you have actual undeniable PROOF of such – let’s go get her/him. If not, you should make a public apology and control your temper. Me and just about everybody here are PISSED at the wrongs and injustices we’ve been subjected to. Let’s not forget who we are and were we come from. We are AMERICAN CITIZENS – act like it.

  51. The audio link does not work.

  52. audio link does not work.

  53. BSE, nice to know you’re still in fight. Best wishes. Roger

  54. My day is not done until someopne goes to jail…and it will not be me !

  55. A similar conspiracy goes on in New York Supreme Court,
    between
    debt collector attorneys Mullooly, Jeffrey, Rooney & Flynn,
    referee Penny Stark,
    corrupt attorneys Schwall &Becker,
    corrupt attorney David K Fiveson of Coronet Title,
    corrupt attorney Thomas P Malone of Fidelity National Title
    and their serial straw buyer Fang Li and Cheetah Realty.

    This gang of racketeers do this by flipping Forged Deeds
    to Frances B Turner and the Marchenas
    and culminates in David K Fiveson of Cornet Title
    and Thomas Malone of Fidelity National Title
    paying a bribe to Judge Alice Schlesinger to rule against the US Supreme Court case of Elliot v. Piersol
    in order to try to sweep this hugh conspiracy
    under the carpet.

    This all happened on my two New York City Condos that
    Astoria Federal S & L admitted they didn’t own when they
    auctioned them off and wanted to Indemnify.

    The thiefs that are living in my properties are in, in their conspracy to deprive me of rightful possession of my Condos.

    New Yorkers deserve honest Judges, If our Courts turn a blind eye to this fraud I hope our attorney general Eric Schneiderman cleans up these crimes.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: