COCHRANE ON DEUTSCH-MORTGAGEIT

EDITOR’S NOTE: GOOD STUFF — VERY HELPFUL FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE DRILLING DOWN

Deal Book reports ‘spin’ provided by business entities who don’t want you to know how they do business. The information I find is pubic. DB is misleading you to believe related mess taking away attention from their own selves been knee deep throughout.

MortgageIt (don’t let the name fool you to how egregious the transactions are) and intent!

Subsidiary of MortgageIt Holdings, Inc.

Note the (New York State business entities) were registered to appear recent. JURISDICTION: ‘Maryland

Federal Reserve Report there is no ‘Mortgage It’ 12/31/2006 but money was moving through it long before 2006.

Research reveals DB Mortgage as related to closings of MortgageIT the relationship:

Federal Reserve Repository 12/31/2006: Details come up for national bank associations only?

405 —-* DB MORTGAGE INVESTMENT INC. (2691215) 273 BALTIMORE MD Domestic Entity Other -Flows to #273 – who is: ->

273 —* DB HOLDINGS (NEW YORK), INC. (1442737) 268 NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity
Flows to #268 – who is:

268 –* DB U.S. FINANCIAL MARKETS HOLDING CORPORATION\ (2259679) 102 NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other Flows to #102 who is:

102 -* TAUNUS CORPORATION (2816906) 1 NEW YORK NY Financial Holding Company – Domestic
Who Flows to #1 – Who is: who flows to

1 * DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (1242423) FRANKFURT GERMANY F i n a n c i a l H o ld i n g Company – Foreign

Who was in charge at that time saying ‘they did not know “what the bubble was”?’ Greenspan what did he exclude form his reports must be analyzed to identify the loopholes and defects of his analysis.
Was he really on TIME’s COVER?

More valuable research facts:

Deutsche Bank “DB” MortgageIT – halted wholesale lending

MortgageIT – consolidated with DB Home Lending, rumored to be offering agency loans only

MortgageIT – layoffs and branch closure

.mec comment Deutsche Bank AG was in big hurry to blow off entities bad debt moving money $10,000,000,000 hard and fast thru SEC ‘MortgageIt’ and notice they only created PROSPECTUS’s!!!! 2004-2005.

Pay attention to the details. Don’t relay on the ‘press releases’ they become the way to control reasonable people pruchasing their stock and products – advertising that’s it!

Deutsche Bank “DB” MortgageIT – halted wholesale lending (but from where?)

MortgageIT – consolidated with DB Home Lending, rumored to be offering agency loans only (11/5/2010 list update related to article and link below 2/7/21 “A List of Mortgage Closures, Mergers and Layoffs”

MortgageIT – layoffs and branch closure

MEC looked up New York State Business Entities-2:
MORTGAGEIT registered in NYS 2/22/1999 as
MIT DOT COM, INC.

Renamed June 15, 1999, as MORTGAGEIT, INC.
NYS Business Entity registered 1999 Stock Information as follows:

# of Shares / Type of Stock / $ Value per Share
22,000,000 Par Value .01
7,500,000 Par Value .01
24,250,000 Par Value .01

———————————————————–

Quoteing: ‘Follow the Money” N.Garfield. I am:

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

MORTGAGEIT CAPITAL TRUST I (3629831) NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other

Created 01/02/2007 – Still open 05/02/2011
MORTGAGEIT CAPITAL TRUST II (3629859) NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other

01/02/2007 Created and 04/30/2008 CLOSED
MORTGAGEIT CAPITAL TRUST III (3629868) NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other

01/02/2007 Created still open 05/02/2011
MORTGAGEIT SECURITIES CORP. (3918030) NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other
02/02/2007 Established

4/30/2008 Institution Closed with Federal Reserve.
Not with SECCIK 1305551 (Asset-Backed Securities) Oldest transactions 10/12/04 – 10/25/05 only PROSPECTUS’s.
IRS# 56-2483326
Doug W. Naidus CEO
10/12/2004
$10,000,000,000 100% Maximum Offering
Registration Fee $1,267,000 (paid to underwriters & Master Servicer just for publishing proposed maximum offering!)

OFFERED SECURITIES
“MortgageIt’ will establish 1 or more trusts and sell ‘mortgage pass-through certificates or mortgage-backed notes’

‘TRUST FUND’
Securities will be secured by a TRUST FUND
a segregated pool of mortgage loans
-mortgage loans servued by 1st and jr. liens on the related mortgage property;
-home equity revoling lines of credit (HELOC)
-mortgage loans little or no equity in related mortgagge property
-mortgage loans secured by ? (what)? residential
-mortgage loans secured by ? (what?) commercial
-manufactured housing conditional sales contracts and installment loan agreements – secured by what?

MORTGAGEIT acquired from one or more affiliated or unaffiliated institutions.
May include any one or any combination:
a financial guaranty insurance policy,
mortgage pool insurance policy,
letter of credit,
special hazard insurance policy, or
reserve fund,
currency or interest rate exchange agreements,
orther type of credit enhancement described in this prospectus (.mec comment REDWOOD TRUST procurement credit enhancement?)

In addition or in lieu of the foregoing, credit enhancment may be provided by means of subordination of one of more classes of securities by cross-collateralization or by overcollateralization.

Search on secinfo.com (2)

MortgageIT Securities Corp/Mortgage Loan Trust/Series 2007-1

MortgageIT Securities Corp/Mortgage Loan Trust/Series 2007-2

——————————————
Federal Reserve System :

MORTGAGEIT SPV HOLDINGS, INC. (3630154) NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other
01/02/2007 Created
12/17/2008 Institution Closed.
MORTGAGEIT, INC. (3629840) NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other

01/02/2007 CREATED and still open 05/02/2011.
http://www.ffiec.gov/nicpubweb/nicweb/SearchForm.aspx

MortgageIT Parents are:

Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft
a (Financial Holding Company – Foreign) and

TANUS Corporation a
(Financial Holding Co Domestic)

MortgageIt operates under FRB ‘characteristic’

Definition:

Domestic Entity Other:
Domestic institutions that engage in banking activities usually in connection with the business of banking in the United States.

Deutsche Bank AG (Foreign) & Taurus (Domestic) operate thru Federal Reserve System using characteristic since 2000 (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act)
Please read this part slowly (Every 10 Years must sell and keep moving, moving, moving …)
Federal Reserve System ‘Characteristic’

Very Important Definition:

Financial Holding Company
A financial entity engaged in a broad range of banking-related activities, created by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.

These activities include: insurance underwriting, securities dealing and underwriting, financial and investment advisory services, merchant banking, issuing or selling securitized interests in bank-eligible assets, and generally engaging in any non-banking activity authorized by the Bank Holding Company Act.

The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for supervising the financial condition and activities of financial holding companies. Similarly, any non-bank commercial company that is predominantly engaged in financial activities, earning 85% or more of its gross revenues from financial services, may choose to become a financial holding company. These companies are required to sell any non-financial (commercial) businesses within ten years.

MortgageIt, Inc. New York,FRB: RSSD ID 3629840
(note did not exist in 2006 for flow of currency in that name)

Business Entity Search 2 Entities exist:
MortgageIt, Inc. 2/22/1999
Jurisdiction NY: Active
CEO Dug W. Naidus
60 Wall St
15th Floor
New York, NY 10005

Former nameMIT DOT COM, Inc. 2/22/1999
6/5/1999 changed to MORTGAGEIT, Inc.
MORTGAGEIT HOLDINGS, CIN
6/22/2004 Jurisdiction MD, County NY
Termination 10/20/2009
DOUG W. NAIDUS CEO
33 Mainden Lane
6th Floor
New York, NY 10038

(.mec comment RELATED TO “MAIDEN LANE?”? for another day

From Business Entity registration you see that Jurisdiction ‘Maryland’

Federal Reserve Report there is no ‘Mortgage It’ 12/31/2006 (how did it move money as a state or federal bank?)

Note below on DB Mortgage as related to closings of MortgageIT and low and behold we have a prior (earlier) relationships.

Federal Reserve System:

405 —-* DB MORTGAGE INVESTMENT INC. (2691215) 273 BALTIMORE MD Domestic Entity Other

Flows to #273 – who is:
273 —* DB HOLDINGS (NEW YORK), INC. (1442737) 268 NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity
Flows to #268 – who is:

268 –* DB U.S. FINANCIAL MARKETS HOLDING CORPORATION\ (2259679)
102 NEW YORK NY Domestic Entity Other
Flows to #102 – who is:

102 -* TAUNUS CORPORATION (2816906) 1 NEW YORK NY Financial Holding Company – Domestic
Who Flows to #1 – Who is:

1 * DEUTSCHE BANK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (1242423) FRANKFURT GERMANY F i n a n c i a l H o ld i n g Company – Foreign

“Who” was in charge of claiming “We Don’t Know What The Bubble Is” or was it “WHY” or “WHO”? I know who.

When GREENSPAN would annouce the numbers and all of the sheep would go crazy to catch the buy – short or long – did GREENSPAN not know what the bubble was? Then we need to know what Greenspan excluded form his reports. Or we will be reporting the same incorrect information to the public right?

What were the loopholes (exclusions) defects and has SOMEBODY identified and corrected the defect?

WILL WE SEE THAT REPORT ON THE COVER OF TIME? WHO IDENTIFIED THE DEFECTS? GREENSPAN IS ON THE COVER OF TIME RIGHT?

Deutsche Bank “DB” MortgageIT – halted wholesale lending

MortgageIT – consolidated with DB Home Lending, rumored to be offering agency loans only
MortgageIT – layoffs and branch closure

Lehman passes transactions through… YOU THINK YOU KNOW ….

Have to let you know in Agreements during foreclosue that Master Servicer BUYER ‘Lehman’ and ‘entity called AURORA AS MASTER SERVICER PASS all loans to be foreclosued thru “National City” see 2010 list ” – ceases wholesale lending”
Report includesnfo on Aurora as what the renamed Lehman Brothers Bank FSB?

BUSINESS ENTITIES IN NY – (NOT IN FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM! SO HOW WERE THEY A LENDER? AS NOTED IN THE 2010 UPDATE?)

Aurora Loan Financial Inc and LLC are/were WHAT, HOW, WHEN, WHERE, WHY, HOW? Come on – the business map depicting business flows from Aurora Loan Financial to Lehman Commodities (does not exist in NYS) only in Wyoming? In 2005 in NYS Aurora created for Loan Mitigation. Wow! 3 Year rolling plan in action. Foreclosues – ready – willing and able to take all of the 95% of uncontested defaults!

Is Bloomberg a TRUSTED SOURCE for the consumers? as reasonable people? Remember they report only what they are given; print what they are given.

I would guess somebody pays a lot for that privlege.
Just another form of deceptive advertising targettging consumers.

Hey America -still feeling ‘safe’ to Mortgage It!

//Company Overview BLOOMBERG
MortgageIT, Inc., a residential mortgage banking company, provides retail, wholesale, and correspondent lending products and services in the United States. The company focuses on originating and lending residential mortgage loans in the United States. It originates residential mortgage loans of various types, including prime adjustable-rate (ARM) and fixed-rate, first-lien residential mortgage loans, sub-prime mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, and second lien loans. The company also originates prime first lien conventional and non-conventional, conforming single-family residential mortgage loans; non-conforming first lien single-family residential mortgage loans, such as jumbo loa…
MortgageIT, Inc., a residential mortgage banking company, provides retail, wholesale, and correspondent lending products and services in the United States. The company focuses on originating and lending residential mortgage loans in the United States. It originates residential mortgage loans of various types, including prime adjustable-rate (ARM) and fixed-rate, first-lien residential mortgage loans, sub-prime mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, and second lien loans. The company also originates prime first lien conventional and non-conventional, conforming single-family residential mortgage loans; non-conforming first lien single-family residential mortgage loans, such as jumbo loans, non-prime loans and ‘‘Alt A’’ loans, as well as home equity and second lien mortgage loans. In addition, it purchases prime first-lien closed mortgage loans from small to mid-sized banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers. MortgageIT offers its products and services through various business channels, such as retail lending, wholesale lending, correspondent lending, and title closing/settlement services. MortgageIT, Inc. was formerly known as MIT DOT COM, Inc. and changed its name to MortgageIT, Inc. in February 1999. The company was founded in 1988 and is based in New York, New York. MortgageIT, Inc. operates as a subsidiary of MortgageIT Holdings, Inc. “”
How Deceptive: FOUNDED IN 1988
33 Maiden Lane
6th and 7th Floor
New Yor 10038
212-651-7700
212-719-0933 (Fax)
GOOGLE.COM states ‘Mortgagei, Inc. is a subsidiary Company
SIC Industry “Mortgage Bankers & Brokers Revenu
Revenue: $295,000,000,000
Employees 2,328?
NAICS: Wholesale Trade Agents and Brokers (425120)
Norm Merritt President
Doug Naidus Co-Founder Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Aurora – stopped wholesale and correspondent lending
Aurora Loan Services – 160 employees laid off
Aurora Loan Services – laid off 70 in Florida,
139 in NJ
Aurora Loan Services – cut 93 jobs in El Toro, CA
——————————————————————-
Source of MortgageIt and relationship to DB from updated 2010 list related to this article 2/7/21:
A List of Mortgage Closures, Mergers and Layoffs
21Feb07
So why are all these mortgage companies consolidating, laying off employees, sending out warnings, and going out of business?
Well, a recent statistic revealed that 2.33% of all US mortgages are currently delinquent, a number which is sure to rise. And repurchases have tripled between the first and second quarter of 2006.
Not to mention declining home values in almost every metropolitan area throughout the United States, sky-high home prices, rampant fraud, a deteriorating secondary market and unmanageable mortgage payments.
I recently began adding mortgage lenders from parts of the world other than the United States that have issued profit warnings, as well as companies that remain open but have been affected seriously by the mortgage crisis in one way or another.
According to a recent report, there were 86,126 mortgage job cuts in 2007, with another 30,000 to 40,000 expected by early 2008.
___________________________
STRANGER DANGER ALERT:
AURORA’ IS A PRETENDER LENDER. NEVER A LENDER THEY ARE SINCE 2005 A ‘LOAN MITIGATOR’ FOR LEHMAN COMMODITIES.
AUROA LOAN SERVICES
http://www.thetruthaboutmortgage.com/a-list-of-recent-mortgage-closures-mergers-and-layoffs/
For example website Foreclosue Help By Bank:
Wells Fargo, PHH MORTGAGE and PHH Bank! RBS, Quicken Loans, PNC, , US Bank NA, AmTrust Bank, FlagStar Bank, Countrywide (logo’s) ‘Ally fictitious name for GMAC Mortgage Corp the one in agreements with Wells Fargo Bank NA – Wells Fargo & Co/MN (formerly Norwest). BB&T BOA CapitalOne Bank, Chase, Citibank, Goldman, HSBC, KeyBank ING Bank, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Option One, Regions, Sovereign, TD Bank, UBS, Union Bank, USAA

12 Responses

  1. Word Mark

    AMTRUST MORTGAGE CORPORATION

    Goods and Services

    IC 036. US 100 101 102. G & S: Mortgage banking services, namely, origination, acquisition, servicing, securitization and brokerage of mortgage loans; Mortgage lending. FIRST USE: 19941001. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19941001

    Standard Characters Claimed

    Mark Drawing Code

    (4) STANDARD CHARACTER MARK

    Trademark Search Facility Classification Code

    LETS-2 AM Two letters or combinations of multiples of two letters

    Serial Number

    78774778

    Filing Date

    December 16, 2005

    Current Basis

    1A

    Original Filing Basis

    1A

    Published for Opposition

    November 11, 2008

    Registration Number

    3567757

    Registration Date

    January 27, 2009

    Owner

    (REGISTRANT) AMTRUST BANK FEDERALLY CHARTERED SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES 1801 EAST NINTH STREET CLEVELAND OHIO 44114
    (LAST LISTED OWNER) NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. CORPORATION DELAWARE 615 MERRICK AVENUE WESTBURY NEW YORK 11590

    Assignment Recorded

    ASSIGNMENT RECORDED

    Attorney of Record

    Catherine R. Keenan

    Prior Registrations

    3284139

    Disclaimer

    NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE “MORTGAGE CORPORATION” APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN

    Type of Mark

    SERVICE MARK

    Register

    PRINCIPAL

    Live/Dead Indicator

    LIVE

  2. A lot of mumbling is going on. Perhaps,Neil is trying to get a message out to all of us.

    No one asked me to provide intelligence. I do so as a Patriot.

    I am not looking to be a headliner.

    I am looking to provide valuable information that can take down ‘Mayhem’ on the television insurance commercials. Mayhem in the court room is the Plaintiff’s attorney screaming left, you follow and crash and burn.

    We don’t have to speculate about what was been done. We need to focus, and using law stay on point.

    Intelligence gathering is more than a copy of the documents left with a consumer at closing.

    Did you notice yet you were left a bunch of doucments that may or may not be part of your closing package. First of all there are no signatures!

    There is an Agent in the state the closing took place. Go get your copies.

    Make sure you get a copy of the intermediary lender the funding transfer deposited into the SELLER’s Corporate Treasury Security.

    You realize that there is a conspiracy, and now you know the conspiracy is huge, and became a weapon of mass destruction.

    I know and all of you will help to reveal by getting evidence that the major private brand label ‘Wells Fargo Bank NA’ is a TROJAN HORSE used by the players who (do business in and as thousands of different business entitites) when selling loans at a discount
    .
    Sadly, you too will find out Wells Fargo Bank NA if not your direct LENDER, will be involved in over 50% of the loans during Origination as SELLER & sold at a discount the loans your purchased at RETAIL. Immediately, the Purchaser or “BUYER’ sells back the servicing rights to the SELLER (of a majority of the transactions).

    SEC transations related to origination and servicing.

    LENDER is never in residential transactions. Whether Filing Agent, Owner, Issuer Filer, SEC documents provide anything but truth and those agreements are inferior to DEED OF TRUST and statutory laws inplace they attempt to MOVE THE COURT with pervasive acts.

    If you were a member of the financial exchange or a distributor, broker, dealer, agent, attorney you could take a blank piece of paper and make up an agreement and provide definitions for terms and roles and responsibilities and disclaimers that neither the Attorney General of NY approves or disapproves. The point?

    The real truth remains to be found inside the ‘mortgage’ ‘note’ ‘deed’ and law of the state and federal governement and blow away all the smoke
    and clean the muck and mire off of the mirrors. The real Agreements, between the Attorney/Agent and Wells Fargo Funding have nothing to do with us.

    There are many agreements, joint ventures, between Party A and Party B which we are not part of.

    Is that why we don’t have accurate business statements at closing?

    The challenge remains to reveal what we can’t see that has harmed us.

    Realize if the LENDER is not before the court, we don’t owe the SERVICER the money just because he says we do.

    Consumers must understand that the COURT by its nature presumes the Plaintiff to have filed lawful and truthful business statements and documents.

    Without documents lawfully recorded consumers are required to seek evidence to prove DEED is a superior document that cannot be recorded in blank just because the servicer says so. And the lawful chain of title and conveyance of the notes are to be in the correct order A, B, C, D or there is mayhem!

    The title remains clouded. when the loans were created. Now what?

    M. Soliman if the Mortgage says LENDER that is meaningless if they are not the LENDER.
    Can you please explain what’s your point?

    Consumers to win you must bring into light of day the defects before the court at the right time when you can catch the Plaintiff lying.

    Remember the Plaintiff has to prove they are the owner of the debt. You will prove they are not the owners of the debt through evidence (not hearsay) and producing evidence in accordance with law.

    Seek that the court clear up the smoke and mirros and fix the defects of the CloudedTitles.com – so please do yourselves a big favor, read David Krieger’s books.

    For example, select the good cases recently discussed recently here about Wells Fargo.

    Cut and paste from those cases good structure and discuss with your attorney and secure evidence by requesting accurate business statements so the SERVICER, Originator, and missing LENDER reveal themselves. If you can’t find an attorney know if you have evidence that job will be easier for attorney’s love to win and give them a case they understand and can argue and the games will begin.

    Think about who you signed the documents and what was the intent of the agent who took your property by deception? Who benefitted from the deceptive acts. How angry are you? The court won’t listen to hearsay and don’t have to tell you they are ignoring what you said.

    If you dod not provide evidence in accordance with strict rules your will lose. Every look at the BLUE BOOK of citations, rules and regulations in the 50 states? That’s one of the reasons you can’t afford to be without an attorney. Attorney’s went through bootcamp and their thinking process was changed. They are superior professional with exceptional knowledge.

    Don’t set yourself up to fail after all of this hard work!
    Only ‘smart choice’ we have to work with the data facts, law, follow the money, and bring into the light of day the deceptive acts.

    I am very depressed to find out that the United States Government (private agencies) are responsible for harming our economy. Now what?

    This is still the Federal Republic with an independent Judiciary who are experts in law in the courts of their jurisdiction. Do you know anything about the court of equtiy?

    Submit evidence according ot the rules and the COURT cannot ignore evidence and if they do you can OBJECT to bring up if necessary at a later date.

    The Plantiff can try to get the evidence dismissed. So can the defendant. Be prepared for war! — the Plaintiff will lie, cheat, steal, file falsified documents with public offices and the court. So what ya gonna do – gonna do about it?

    Don’t focus on administrative erros as a means to win a case when you owe moeny for a debt. The administrative errors in process will not win your case.

    Even fraud, these evil mongers knew a court would evaluate the fraud and in the event of fraudulent acts evaluate whether the outcome would be the same with or without the fraud.

    What staute of limiations are we under in these cases anyway. There must be some reason for the delays now.

    After five years the FDIC will be out of the woods. Lets make sure we keep the cases going with evidence and help protect not only ourselves but our nation.

    Reveal that the Plaintiff is lying, catch them in the act by having evidence ready to take them down and build your case.

    Smart defense attorney’s seek a ruling from the Judge and wait. They don’t speak. The Judge will rule over your request if you provide evidence. Be quiet and watch the Plaintiff try to lead you to the tainted water hole. He who speaks first loses.

    Read the articles here, learn legal vernacular, interview an attorney, don’t be intimidated because you are not sure about what you understand.

    Utilize the free legal dictionary to become familiar with legal terms inside a contract. One word can mean a large paragraph of text.

    Do not trust an attorney just because that is their title.

    Many business people are attorney’s and REO Brokers and partners of a legal company and a partnter in a law firm who is a robo-debt collector!

    Due proces of law is available to protect you from unlawful siezure of your property.

    However, in order to be safe you have to be smarter than the average bear. You cannot trust ‘trust’ your very life in the hands of strangers who place you in danger and who have everything to gain if you lose. Test the waters and find out if they are on the dark side.

    A bankruptcy attorney won’t protect you just because you had a conversation about the loan fraud.

    Did you ask them specific questions? Sneak in a test question to find out if they follow ‘ethics’ know what the answer should be so you can get a feel for the side they walk at night or during the day.

    IF you ask your attorney specific questions, they have a duty to respond and provide ethical advice.

    If they are not a subject matter expert and are unable to address the question you raised or provide legal advice they can be found negligent if they withhold advice and/or remain silent when they should advise you their client.

    You owe a debt, so are they going to find out who you owe the debt to and/or who is the party before the court — the Servicer and if the SERVICER what are they going to do. Attorney’s who walk in the light are not going to tell you their strategy and every move but can exchange information so you know they are putting their foot forth into the light in your best interest.

    The one’s on the dark side are not afraid of going to hell for the love of money is their God.

  3. M.Soliman, here is a link to your BBB record, can you please explain to us all why you have a F rating with the BBB of Los Angeles Ca.?
    http://www.la.bbb.org/Business-Report/Nationwide-Loan-Services-100072153

  4. carie,

    They have to prove to you. Will not likely respond to requests. But, even if they can show that it was in original Mortgage Schedule — and part of Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement (always an intent – not actual execution) — it does not mean your loan stayed there, or remains there – or was properly conveyed.

    None of the trusts were properly executed as to transfer of so-called “mortgage” loans.

    Accounting mess? Yes. Courts should not have to go that far as to individual cases – assignments/endorsement clearly not according to PSA.

    But, anyone who can — on a large scale expose accounting mess –yes — Mr. Soliman — a pot of gold. Would “trickle down” to help individual cases. Go for it — we need everything, and this would be a big help!!!.

  5. ANONYMOUS:

    Do you think it wise to send a letter to the Deutsche Bank address I have in Santa Ana, CA, asking for documentation stating whether or not my property is listed in a particular securitization trust? I have read that sometimes it’s an “empty pool”…does that make sense?

  6. So ask yourself this again – (very funny Steve , Thanks alot ) ;

    Why is this so –
    Promissory Note: – Lender (shown)
    Deed / Mortgage: – Lender & MERS (shown)
    HUD I Statement – Lender (shown)

    If RESPA Reg X prohibits parties to a transaction avoiding disclosure on the HUD I statement.
    Why does the Deed, list both names.

    MERS is – Joinder Compulsive , Passive Adverse , but none the less joinder . MSoliman

  7. Who’s going to win? Who will get the answer? Who will get the pot of Gold? . . . And the answers do not reveal themselves, do they?

    So ask yourself this Ye mischief makers;

    Promissory Note: – Lender (shown)
    Deed / Mrtgage: – Lender
    -MERS

    HUD I – Lender

    If RESPA Reg X prohibits parties to a transaction from avoiding disclosure on the HUD I statement.
    Why does the Deed, list both names. (he’s back —oh God he’s back –Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh)

  8. STRANGER DANGER ALERT:
    AURORA’ IS A PRETENDER LENDER. NEVER A LENDER THEY ARE SINCE 2005 A ‘LOAN MITIGATOR’ FOR LEHMAN COMMODITIES.
    AUROA LOAN SERVICES

    AURORA under C&D with Feds to act as disposition HOLDCO – counter parties Agent to Lehman Liquidation (Ohhh Stop him – Call the BBB) and to facilitate Lehman remaining assets held in their FSB .

    We sold over qtr billion to Aurora and Jamie S is their head counsel – Once a great Company – What is with the Pretender gender non sense again? I’m missing the argument (if there is one, really) Sold to Aurora around 1997-1998

  9. Deutsche Bank has lots of problems. Check this case out.
    http://www.foreclosurehamlet.org/profiles/blogs/deutsche-bank-is-screwed-as

  10. Does the following snippit that Mary Cochrane posted mean that prospectuses were written, but that the trusts upon which the prospectuses were written were never actually formed? (From 10/12/04-10/25/05 ?)

    “4/30/2008 Institution Closed with Federal Reserve.
    Not with SECCIK 1305551 (Asset-Backed Securities) Oldest transactions 10/12/04 – 10/25/05 only PROSPECTUS’s.
    IRS# 56-2483326
    Doug W. Naidus CEO
    10/12/2004
    $10,000,000,000 100% Maximum Offering
    Registration Fee $1,267,000 (paid to underwriters & Master Servicer just for publishing proposed maximum offering!)”

    Would that have anything to do with the following snippit from a 2006 Securitization.net article about IndyMac’s trading syndicate?

    Per Securitization.net blog posting from 2006:

    http://www.securitization.net/knowledge/article.asp?id=451&aid=6617

    “The IndyMac executives noted that Deutsche was dropped from their syndicate in 2004, following the departures of several key staffers from the bank’s underwriting area.”

    Did Deutsche decide that it was more profitable to make up their own fake trusts than to be involved with IndyMac’s?

    I will check SEC to see when last IndyMac / Deutsche Trust was formed in 2004. I wonder if it was around September/October….

    Please post clarification if anyone has more details! Thanks!

  11. I’ve taken a lot of grief for my comments about Mary’s posts lately. Richard’s comment is, I think, very illustrative of my point. It’s great information but doesn’t apply to the masses, and even those that find it applying exactly to their facts don’t know how to use it!! My issue isn’t with Mary at all. It’s with the heavy rotation she’s getting at the expense of other posts. As I write this, Mary’s contributions take up 3 of the 7 “recent posts” at the top of the page, and are actually the last 3 consecutive posts. Has Neil ceded editorial control and content curation to someone else?

  12. Mary, please email me at damon715leo@yahoo.com I have two mtgs through mortgage it and really would appreciate having a conversation on how to interpret and include in defense against plaintiff. Regards, richard

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: