J SELNA DIST. FED CT. CENTRAL DISTRICT CALIFORNIA: TRO AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ONE ON ONE WITH NEIL GARFIELD ONE ON ONE WITH NEIL GARFIELD

COMBO ANALYSIS TITLE AND SECURITIZATION

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

SELNA CA-TRO DEUTSCH AURORA QUALITY

Attorney Lenore L. Albert in Huntington beach, CA, attorney for Plaintiffs and the Class Action has secured an order that is worth reading both from the standpoint of what you should be looking for as well as what should be in your pleadings. The Court has obviously been convinced that Deutsch, Aurora, Quality Loan Service et al are involved in an enterprise that if not criminal, does not meet the standards of due process or even just plain common sense and fairness.

J Selna is paving the way for a permanent injunction against them for much the same reasons as we have seen in the high Court decisions around the country including the recent Ibanez decision in Massachusetts, and the very recent New jersey decision. The Order is important not only for its content but because of its form which is why I want you to read it.

The Order 1st prohibits the Defendants from taking ANY action with respect to the properties, and second sets the stage for making that prohibition permanent. What is interesting to me about this order is the specificity of the order and the timing in which it takes effect. See if you don’t agree.

14 Responses

  1. Gary H,
    What is your request in regards to? If I may ask. (Note: If it’s about some or a request for juicy dirt don’t mention or ask for it here, especially vis-a-vis any of the named parties to the suit in the LL post).

  2. Gary H,
    You could leave your email, but leave out the @, put a space instead and the same thing for the . followed by the first letter of the domain type address that’s used.

  3. Dying Trurh,

    How can I contact you?

    Gary

  4. WHY ASK FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER?

    Why not file an action in the criminal court (Harassment et. al) and obtain a TRESPASSING RESTRAINING ORDER under CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE 602?

    IF THE GRANTOR/MORTGAGOR/CREDITOR (HOMEOWNERS) UNDER THE DEED OF TRUST NEVER ABANDONED THEIR LAND (Title) OR GRANTED INTEREST TO THE FORECLOSING ENTITY, THEN IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE TO CLAIM THAT THE BANKS ARE CRIMINAL TRESPASSING ON YOUR PROPERTY (Land) IN ORDER TO TAKE BACK POSSESSION TO REMOVE CURRENT UNWELCOME OCCUPANTS INSIDE THE HOUSE? If these people did not have your permission to stay inside the house you never abandoned then they are squatters and squatters can be removed from your land.

    RESEARCH HOMEOWNERS’ “BUNDLE OF RIGHTS” .

    THIS IS A WAY TO TAKE BACK POSSESSION OF YOUR HOUSE IF YOU HAVE BEEN EVICTED.

    IF YOU HAVE ROCK SOLID PROOF OF BANK FRAUD THEN YOU DON’T HAVE TO THINK TWICE IN TAKING BACK POSSESSION OF YOUR HOME THE BANKSTERS STOLE FROM YOU!

    June Reyno 858-361-2399

  5. Wow!!!! that went straight thru the Defrausters’ heart!!!!, just read the court order and boy!!! the biggest thief of them all Deutsch Bank got to be really PO right now, they are in for a long ride if “justice” decides to pursue the issue at hand exactly as the LAW mandates.

  6. http : // interactivecounsel.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/TRO_No_2_Signed_by_Judge_011911.19121442.pdf

    http : // interactivecounsel.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/yau_-_Notice_of_Decision_of_Court_012811.28152333.PDF

    Here you go, but you have to remove the spaces from the links. The second link is one that Neil didn’t post and has the names of the members of the class.

  7. My monthly payment with Ocwen just jumped from $3100 to $ 5800. HELP!!

    Any chance of a Loan Mod?
    Im expecting a NOD any day now…

    What happened to my country?
    40 years ago my Mom a single woman worked two jobs and was able to purchase her own home.

  8. My loan is being serviced by Ocwen.
    How can I tell if my loan was handled by MERS?
    And or ROBO signers?

  9. Is this in pacer? Can you post links or upload to Scribd for us to read them? Who is impacted? Is it anyone with DB in California or do you have to be a part of the actual lawsuit?

  10. I posted links but Neil’s moderating my comments with links in them but here’s the case.

    Yau v. Deutsche Bank SACV11-6 JVS (RNBx)

  11. Where can i find this case?

  12. Where is link to court case?

  13. I would like to see the moving papers.

  14. Somebody likes changing their name and who they represent around it seems.

    In re Hubbel, 09-3424; In re Perez, 09-3425 427 B.R. 789 (N.D. Cal. 2010)

    “Melissa Robbins, McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, for Appellants Aurora Loan Services, LLC,”
    http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15823913632322682823

    Yau v. Deutsche Bank SACV11-6 JVS (RNBx)

    “For Third Party Quality Loan Services Corp.
    Melissa Robbins Coutts, Esq.
    McCarthy & Holthus, LLP”
    http://interactivecounsel.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/TRO_No_2_Signed_by_Judge_011911.19121442.pdf

    Unless she got married. But then still, why is she representing Quality when there’s an obvious conflict from her having also represented Aurora?

    Is it just me or does it look like all these fraudclosures are being pushed by by armies of “Esq. Attorneys LP” hiding behind empty shell corporations without valid licenses?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: