65% of Fresno Judges Have MERS on Their Own Mortgages

by HYDROGENE

EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the part of this mission that I love — when people start getting proactive and shining the light where nobody from the dark side wants it. It just so happens that there are several Judges around the country that have consulted with our analysts regarding their own mortgages. In MOST cases these Judges do not hear mortgage cases, but not all. I know for a fact that several of them are considering strategic defaults despite the obvious political consequences and perhaps because of them.

But be careful here. The way this information is being used in Court right now is that lawyers are researching the same things that this person did and then using ANOTHER home a few houses away from the home of the Judge to use as an example. The Judge hears the address and it doesn’t take him or her more than a millisecond to see the case in a whole different light. The one thing reported to me by lawyers using this information is that when they do it right, they get much more of the Judge’s attention both in time and quality — and they are saying that the percentage of times the Judge allows discovery to proceed is increasing exponentially.

Remember that tactically, this case will be won at the beginning because there probably won’t be any end. Once the pretender lender is forced to produce a complete chain of authorized, valid documents, the jig is up. The same lawyer that told you your theories were annoying and ridiculous will turn around and make an offer that you won’t be able to resist — but you also won’t be able to talk about it. Every settlement is contingent upon absolute confidentiality. So for example let’s just say that you close out a case where the property was purchased for $650,000 and the mortgage was $600,000 at 7%. AND let’s say you get a settlement where you as lawyer get paid $75,000, your client gets $50,000 in damages and the mortgage is reduced to $135,000 at 3% 30 years fixed. You probably would want to brag about it. Your client probably would want to throw a party. None of that. You and your client stay quiet or else the money is due back — and so is the house.

LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Everyone, I downloaded every Judge in CA. I isolated the Judges in Fresno County, CA where I live. There are 41 Judges in our county and 27 of them have MERS ON THEIR MORTGAGE according to the County Recorders Website. I determined that the Judge in my case not only has one he has two mortgages with MERS AS BENEFICIARY on two different properties. It is my understanding that since a DEED OF TRUST IS A CONTRACT I HAVE A CONTRACT WITH MERS AND SO DOES THE JUDGE. BASED ON THAT DOESN’T HE HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN DECIDING MY CASE AND SHOULDN’T HE RECUSE HIMSELF ? I HAVEN’T BROUGHT THIS TO HIS ATTENTION YET AND I BET HE HAS NO IDEA ABOUT MERS. Can anyone tell me whether I’m right about this or not.
We have been fighting the BANKSTERS SINCE OCTOBER 2007 PRO SE AND OUR NEXT COURT DATE IS JAN.27, 2011.
THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HELP AND KEEP UP THE GOOD FIGHT.

HYDROGENE

9 Responses

  1. BTBD, are you still around? Pite Duncan also erased the original numers on my docs. Let’s share. KPPI2U@gmail.com.

  2. Why does this not surprise me. That means the judges in the foreclosure courts (judicial states) need to be carefully researched as to their real estate holdings. I am not throwing out the judges in nonjudicial states. Home owners in nonjudicial states have it even worse than the judicial states. I am going to look up the judges that are in SC and see what I can see. Good job on looking at this. http://www.challengingforeclosure.com Sirak@challeningforeclosure.com

  3. IN FLORIDA, the Judiciary is/was so heavily SCREWED by their Buddies/Attny plaintiff’s due to the Rocket Docket for years!

    ALL FLORIDA Judges were so Ignorant, THEY HAD TO RELIE on the BANK’S ATTNY’S to guide them threw the process suffice ROCKET DOC, Judge ” did you pay your mortgage? ” Defendent ” no “, Judge ” summery Jud in favor of Plaintiff, sale in 30 days “!!

    You could almost hear the judges telling their Buddy Bank Attny ” get this shit out of here before they are on to us! ”

    IMO, other than Federal BK Judges + Appeal Courts, circuit Judges were complicit in the Chain of FRAUD, and should be brought up on Criminal Charges! ” ignorance of the law is no excuse ” to use their academic phraseology!

    Judges consistently ( at the advise of Plaintiff council ) were told to Hide Behind the UCC argument, and crapola turkey stuffing case law!

    I would politely differ with Neil on the go easy with the Judge scenario. Rather, where are the Federal Agents hauling these ( Judges ) off to Leavenworth??

    If you bother to look around, you will find MOST JUDGES ARE HEAVILY INVESTED IN REAL ESTATE, as well as LOAN SHARKING through cleverly devised Investor groups ( groups of Judges, and the like who pooled cash through conduits used to fund mortgages at 12% – 13% in order to eventually foreclose ( steal Grandma’s house ), and recoup Fee’s Interest ect. .

    You see Judges are no different than you or me except where they are Players in the same Fraud that banks were to achieve the same CRIME which is FRAUD!

  4. REGARDING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
    THE LAW OFFICE OF PITE DUNCAN LLP
    The Law Office Of Pite Duncan Produced a so call
    original note to the Ferderal BK Court in 2009 that was differant from the one they produced in 2010.
    The 2009 alleged note had a mers number and a bar code. You could clearly see where my og loan number was erased the lines is still there.In 2010 the OG alleged note they erased the MERS number and the OG loan number and erased all the numbers on the deed of trust. THIS IS A CLEAR CASE OF FRAUD ON THE COURTS. PEOPLE WE NEED TO PUT OR PAPERS TOGETHER AND BRING DOWN THESE FORCLOSURE MILLS ATTORNEYS LIKE THEY DID IN FLORIDA. SOUNDS LIKE THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID STERNS. GOOD JOB MR AND MISS SOLOMON.

  5. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE A LONG TIME AGO AND HUFFPOST WILL GET THE WORD OUT.

    RECLUSE THE JUDGES WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOOSE

    ANOTHER PROBLEM THE JUDGES HAVE IS THAT THEY ARE USED TO GOING UP AGAINST CRIMINALS. AND MOST OF US ARE NOT CRIMINALS. THAT IS ANOTHER REASON THEY WILL ULTIMATELY LOOSE AND LOOSE BIG TIME

    CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ECONOMIC GENOSIDE TREASON AGAINST THE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES ETC… THE SAME CHARGES THAT ARE LEVELED AGAINST MASS MURDERERS RAPIST. DEATH PENALTY (WHICH I AM AGAINST BUT THESE ARE SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES LIKE EICHMAN AND THE NUREMBERG TRIALS) IS WHAT SHOULD BE LEVELED AGAINST THE ROCKET DOCKET JUDGES.

    HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO YOU ALL.

    NEVER AGAIN
    G-D BLESS AMERICA

  6. The deed of trust is NOT a contract. It’s a trust. aka a devise. Like a will. It’s subject to trust law not contract law. Mortgagor = Trustor, mortgagee = trustee,

  7. Like I’ve said, they never care until it hits close to home. And we DESPERATELY need judges on our side, but we need to make it known all of the conflicts that exist and let them know that we know, but we need your help doing this Neil, please. Abby in CA has some of the cold hard facts I’ve been preaching for years, but didn’t have the resources to get to.

  8. Neil keep going , we get smarter every day.

  9. http://gvbids.com/fraud/adversary/66.pdf
    MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PITE DUNCAN LLP FRAUD ON THE COURT

    Solomon v Eloan, Wells Fargo, Mers
    CALIFORNIA EASTERN DISTRICT BANKRUPTCY COURT SACRAMENTO

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: