6 Responses

  1. The Judge here in our county in Florida granted my request to see the original note, as I have a half a dozen reasons to beleive the entity attempting to steal my house is not the holder of my note or mortgage., It is also held by MERS. (alledged HSBC as servicer ) Its sure looking like I am right becasue here we are almost three years later and nobody can produce the original note or any original documents in blue ink! Their law office or SOMEBODY went on down to our county court house and filed in bold print “FILED ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORTGAGE” Then there was nothing . I refer to it as the invisible note and mortgage. I guess they didn’t think anybody would ever look any further to see that what they actually filed was a shoddy corporate assignment prepared by HSBC from HSBC to HSBC and every signature on it is an HSBC employee. Thats right,just assign my mortgage to yourself, who needs real legal notes or docs!!!!!

  2. It seems to me that the pretender/lenders are very good at photoshopping notes when they need them. You can even make the scanned (and stolen) signature blue. No problem! Just a little bit more fraud and forged documents. So, you go to court, and the pretender/lender whips out the new and better “wet Ink” note–you are screwed. The Judge thinks he is looking at the original note, but it is not the original note. Actually, if this mess ever does get cleaned up, I think it is mandatory that the original note be maintained for the life of the loan. What happended to the best evidence rule? http://www.challengingforeclosure.com Sirak@challengingforeclosure.com

  3. http://foreclosureblues.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/former-maryland-prosecutor-and-council-member-wife-arrested-by-the-fbi-while-flushing-100000-real-estate-developer-check-and-stuffing-bra-with-80000/

    Maryland official, wife hid money as FBI approached, affidavit says
    By Terry Frieden, CNN
    November 12, 2010 8:45 p.m. EST
    Click to play
    US Atty.: Johnsons tried to flush check
    STORY HIGHLIGHTS

    * NEW: Johnsons are charged with tampering with evidence and destruction of records
    * NEW: Agents hear Jack Johnson tell his wife to “flush” a check
    * Federal agents executed search warrants as part of an ongoing investigation
    * Affidavit: Leslie Johnson hides $80,000 in her bra as FBI agents knock at the door

    Washington (CNN) — Panicked as the FBI closed in Friday morning, Prince Georges County Executive Jack Johnson and his wife Leslie raced to find a $100,000 check for an alleged kickback and flush it down the toilet.

    With agents knocking at the door, Leslie Johnson stuffed nearly $80,000 in her bra.

    The dramatic end to an alleged years-long kickback scheme is outlined in detail in an affidavit written by FBI investigator Wendy Munoz, whose team was monitoring wiretaps.

    Johnson, who has served as the executive of Prince Georges County since 2002, was taken into custody along with his wife.

    The Johnsons made a first appearance in federal court late Friday in Greenbelt, Maryland, just outside Washington.

    They were both charged with tampering with evidence and destruction of records. U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein stressed the investigation is continuing.

    The Johnsons were released on their own recognizance, but Jack Johnson will be required to wear a monitoring device. He presumably will be allowed to continue serving out the last weeks of his expiring term as county executive if he chooses. The judge, however, ordered him not to attempt to destroy any evidence.

    Jack Johnson had been the Prince Georges County prosecutor prior to his eight years as executive.

    Leslie Johnson was just recently elected to the nine-member Prince Georges County Council.

    The ten-page affidavit says the FBI began investigating Johnson in 2006 when it learned that certain real estate developers were paying Johnson for contracts. That led to a “a series of authorizations for the interception of wire communications.”

    The frantic end began early Friday when Johnson allegedly received a $15,000 payoff, and the FBI suddenly barged into the room to demand an explanation.

    Johnson told them the cash was for a party marking the end of his tenure as county executive. He also claimed he had no dealings with the developer who was with him.

    The FBI says Johnson made a series of false statements. The agents let him go but then eavesdropped on a series of frantic phone calls between Jack and Leslie Johnson as Jack Johnson and the FBI headed for the Johnsons’ Mitchellville, Maryland, home.

    “Two women (agents) are at the door,” Leslie told her husband.

    “Don’t answer it,” Jack said. He told her to run upstairs to their bedroom and go to “my drawer.”

    “You will see a check in there that [an unidentified developer] wrote to me,” he said.

    The affidavit says when Leslie found the check Jack told her to tear it up. “Do you want me to put it down the toilet?” she asked. Jack Johnson replied, “Yes, flush that.” The agents monitoring the phone calls heard a flushing sound.

    Leslie Johnson grabbed cash from the bedroom and also ran to the basement and grabbed more cash. “Put in your bra and walk out or something, I don’t know what to do, Jack said.

    “I have it in my bra,” his wife replied.

    “FBI agents then searched the person of Leslie Johnson incident to her arrest and recovered $79,600 in U.S. currency from her underwear,” the affidavit says.

    The wild ending may end up costing the Johnsons. The FBI says there is probable cause to believe that the pair “tampered with … evidence and engaged in destruction, alteration, and falsification of records in a federal investigation.”

    The FBI document does not say how much money Johnson may have received in kickbacks or bribes. It does say at least some of the funds involved were targeted from an $80 million dollar budget to programs supported by federal grants such as those from Department of Housing and Community Development.

  4. Florida: How can I get the court to order Plaintiffs to file the alleged original note so that no more hanky panky can occur?

    Because after almost two years of nonsense answers and objections, my credit is being destroyed by these pretender lenders with no rights and a bogus assignment is further clouded title.

    Can I make Motion to sequester the Note?? If anyone has any knowledge about this, please reply.

  5. MERS ATTEMPT TO MAKE IT LEGAL http://www.scribd.com/doc/41754715/MERS-eRegistry-Legal-Opinion-1

    MERS QUESTIONS ON AUDIT TRAIL FOR SUPONEA OF THEIR RECORDS.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41754053/Mers-Suponea-11-8-10-Final-Mers-Audit-Trail

    10 KILLER PROBLEMS FOR MERS.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41752731/Mers-10-Headaches-killer-Problems

    MERS OWN PROCEDURES

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41750201/MERS-Procedures-Rel16-Draft-1

    THE APPELLATE BRIEF THAT STATES ON THE RECORD WHAT MERS DOES AND OWNS 2004 NEBRASKA

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41745712/MERS-Appellants-Brief-MERS-v-Nebraska-Dept-of-Banking-Filed-15-Oct-
    2004

    THE FLORIDA BANKSER ASSOCIATIONS DIRECT INDICATION THAT COPYING NOTES ELECTRONIC AND DESTROYING THE ORIGINAL IS ROUTINE, AND THEREFORE SHOULD BE ALLOWED FOR EVERYONE.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/41720567/Florida-Banker-s-Association-Lost-Notes-09-1460-093009-comments-Fba-1

  6. NACA IS DOING A PROGRAM CHASING CHASE FOR NOT COMPLYING WITH THE HAMP AND OTHER DEALINGS WITH HOMEOWNERS

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/42480711/NACA-is-Chasing-Chase-for-Non-Compliance-HAMP-THEY-WILL-PROTEST-AND-FIGHT-CHASE

    NACA lawsuit against Chase for violation of the NACA contract;

    NACA has a contract with Chase providing long-term affordable solutions. NACA has legally binding agreements will all the major lenders/servicers and major investors including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Chase is the only one that has refused to adhere to the contract. The case is scheduled for the week of February 21-25, 2011 in Washington D.C.

    Individual lawsuits against Chase nationwide;

    NACA will assist with the initiation and work on individual lawsuits against Chase. These will be filed in state and federal court based on violations of lending laws and where the judges are most responsive to homeowners. NACA will identify attorneys who will be aggressive against Chase.

    Divesting from Chase by boycotting all of its products and services;

    NACA will be initiating a nationwide campaign to have individuals, organizations, unions, pensions, and investors terminate their existing relationship with Chase and refuse to do future business. Chase’s profits would be significantly impacted if its image is negatively impacted and people refuse to purchase its products.

    Organizing nationwide protests against Chase;

    NACA will expand our extremely effective direct action activities against Chase. We have gone to the homes of CEOs, taken over offices and conducted many effective demonstrations. We believe in non-violent but aggressive and confrontational actions.

    If you are interested in being on the Chasing Chase Advocacy Team click here.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: