HUFFPOST: Foreclose on the Foreclosure Fraudsters, Part 2: Spurious Arguments Against Holding the Fraudsters Accountable

“Let us deal with the “borrower fraud” argument first because it is the area containing the most erroneous assumptions. There was fraud at every step in the home finance food chain:

  • the appraisers were paid to overvalue real estate;
  • mortgage brokers were paid to induce borrowers to accept loan terms they could not possibly afford;
  • loan applications overstated the borrowers’ incomes;
  • speculators lied when they claimed that six different homes were their principal dwelling;
  • mortgage securitizers made false reps and warranties about the quality of the packaged loans;
  • credit ratings agencies were overpaid to overrate the securities sold on to investors; and
  • investment banks stuffed collateralized debt obligations with toxic securities that were handpicked by hedge fund managers to ensure they would self destruct.”

Our call for closing down control frauds and stopping the foreclosure frauds typically meets with three objections. First, it is claimed that while there were some bad apple lenders, much of the fraud was committed by borrowers. Our proposal would let fraudulent borrowers remain in homes to which they are not entitled, punishing the banks that were duped. Second, the biggest banks are too important to foreclose. And third, it is not possible to resolve a “too big to fail” institution.

Who is Guilty?

Let us deal with the “borrower fraud” argument first because it is the area containing the most erroneous assumptions. There was fraud at every step in the home finance food chain: the appraisers were paid to overvalue real estate; mortgage brokers were paid to induce borrowers to accept loan terms they could not possibly afford; loan applications overstated the borrowers’ incomes; speculators lied when they claimed that six different homes were their principal dwelling; mortgage securitizers made false reps and warranties about the quality of the packaged loans; credit ratings agencies were overpaid to overrate the securities sold on to investors; and investment banks stuffed collateralized debt obligations with toxic securities that were handpicked by hedge fund managers to ensure they would self destruct.

That homeowners would default on the nonprime mortgages was a foregone conclusion throughout the industry — indeed, it was the desired outcome. This was something the lending side knew, but which few on the borrowing side could have realized.

The homeowners were typically fraudulently induced by the lenders and the lenders’ agents (the loan brokers) to enter into nonprime mortgages. The lenders knew the “loan to value” (LTV) ratios and income to debt ratios that they wanted the borrower to (appear to) meet in order to make it possible for the lender to sell the nonprime loan at a premium. LTV can be gimmicked by inflating the appraisal. The debt to income ratios can be gimmicked by inflating income. “Liar’s” loan lenders used that loan format because it allowed the lender to simultaneously loan to a vast number of borrowers that could not repay their home loans, at a premium yield, while making it look to the purchaser of the loan that it was relatively low risk. Liar’s loans maximized the lender’s reported income, which maximized the CEO’s compensation.

The problem is that only the most sophisticated nonprime borrowers (the speculators who bought six homes) (1) knew the key ratios they had to appear to meet, (2) had the ability to induce an appraiser to inflate substantially the reported market value of the home, and (3) knew how to create false financial information that was internally consistent and credible. The solution was for the lender and the lender’s agents to (1) instruct the borrower to report a certain income or even to fill out the application with false information, (2) suborn an appraiser to provide the necessary inflated market value, and (3) create fraudulent financial information that had at least minimal coherence.

When the overburdened homeowner began missing payments, late fees and higher interest rates kicked-in, boosting the stated income of mortgage servicers and the value of the securities. Not coincidentally, the biggest banks own the servicers and could maximize claims against the mortgages by running up the late fees. It was quite convenient to “misplace” mortgage payments, so even homeowners who were never delinquent could get hit with fees and higher rates. And when payments were received, the servicers would (illegally) apply them first to the late fees, meaning the homeowners were unknowingly still missing mortgage payments. The foreclosure process itself generates big fees for the SDI banks.

And, miracle of miracles, the banks would end up with the homes and get to restart the whole process again — from resale of the home through the financing, securitizing, and fee-for-servicing juggernaut.

Unfortunately, it did not go quite as smoothly as planned. The SDIs were supposed to act like neutron bombs — killing the homeowners but leaving the homes standing, to be resold. The problem is that wiping out borrowers lowered the value of real estate, crushing not only the real estate market but also construction and through to all associated sectors from furniture and home restoration supplies to big ticket purchases that rely on home equity loans. It also led to questions about the value of the securitized toxic waste manufactured and held directly or indirectly by financial institutions.

Next, a few judges began to question the foreclosures, as they saw case after case in which the banks claimed to have lost the paperwork or submitted amateurishly forged documents. Or, several banks would go after the same homeowner, each claiming to hold the same mortgage (Bear sold the same mortgage over and over). Insiders began to offer depositions exposing fraud and perjury. It became apparent that in many and perhaps most cases, the trusts responsible for the securities (often these are “special purpose” subsidiaries of the banks) never received the “notes” signed by the borrowers — as required by both IRS tax code and by 45 of the US states. Without the notes, billions of dollars of back taxes could be due, and the foreclosures violate state law. Finally, the Attorneys General of all fifty states called for a foreclosure moratorium.

What to do? We suggest an immediate moratorium on foreclosures and a requirement that all notes be produced by purported holders of mortgages within a reasonable length of time. If they cannot be found, the mortgages — as well as the securities that pool them — are no longer valid. That means that the homeowners are not indebted, and that the homes are owned free and clear. And that, dear bankers, is a big, big problem. It is also the law — without evidence of debt, there is no debtor and no creditor.

Commentators are horrified that a foreclosure moratorium would let “deadbeat” borrowers remain in their homes while delinquent in their payments. The speculators that purchased “MacMansions” and stated on six separate loan applications that each house was their principal dwelling are frauds. The moratorium would (briefly) reward fraudulent borrowers while (briefly) punishing the fraudulent banks. This is true.

It is not possible to separate “worthy” borrowers who were duped by banks from all “unworthy” borrowers who knew the loan applications were false. Indeed, given the millions of borrowers that received liar’s loans, even if the borrowers were all frauds we could not possibly prosecute all of them due to lack of resources. We currently prosecute roughly 1,000 mortgage fraud cases annually at the federal level. If we used all of our resources to investigate and prosecute fraudulent mortgage borrowers exclusively we would be able to prosecute less than one-tenth of one percent of those frauds.

The losses that the fraudulent nonprime lenders caused are vastly greater than the losses caused by fraudulent borrowers, so no rational prosecutor would use his scarce resources to prosecute individual nonprime borrowers. Moreover, prosecutions of individual borrowers for alleged fraud in the applications would be difficult to win against competent defense counsel because it will not be possible to infer the borrower’s intent and knowledge and whether the loan agent instructed him to enter specified information on the application. We are not arguing that the speculator who committed fraud while buying six homes should be allowed to walk free. We are simply arguing that it makes no sense to use limited judicial resources to go after owner-occupier households where it will be almost impossible to prove intent to defraud.

On the other hand, we can infer a lender’s fraudulent intent because it is financially sophisticated and has expertise in lending. An honest mortgage lender would not make “liar’s loans” because absence of proper underwriting inherently produces loans that are expected to default. Yet, in 2006 just about half of all mortgages originated were liar’s loans. Banks happily advertised specialization in “no doc” and NINJA loans. There can be no question about intent — the intent was fraud, plain and simple. Fraud on the part of credit raters is equally easy to infer — we have the internal emails that document intent to defraud securities purchasers by “pay to play” schemes. And the fraud committed by the investment banks that pooled the mortgages is also well documented. These entities committed tens of thousands and even millions of frauds each. For obvious efficiency reasons, that is where our judicial resources ought to be directed.

Macro Effects and Culpability

There is one other consideration that biases the case in favor of borrowers. Many homeowners were sold on the idea that “real estate values only go up” — and quite a few planned to refinance on better terms, or even to flip the house at a price that would allow them to pay-off a mortgage they could not otherwise afford. We realize that it is not easy to shed tears for speculators foiled by the market, and that is not our point.

What is important to understand, however, is that the financial sector is largely culpable for the generation of speculative frenzy, the creation of the “financial weapons of mass destruction”, and the transformation toward financial fragility that finally collapsed in 2007. In the aftermath we lost 10 million jobs and millions of homeowners lost their homes. The “collateral damage” inflicted by the SDIs is now endangering tens of millions of American families — most of whom played no role in the speculative euphoria. Almost half of American homeowners are already underwater or on the verge of going under. In short, it was Wall Street that turned our homes over to a financial casino — and so far virtually all the losses have been suffered on Main Street.

This culpability is at the aggregate scale and of course no individual bank can be held liable in court for the collapse of the financial system. Rather, each bank’s guilt must be assessed according to its own fraud. However, a national moratorium on foreclosures must be evaluated at the macro level, and justified on the basis of the aggregate costs, benefits, and moral implications. And certainly at the aggregate level that must be considered by President Obama, the benefits to the majority of Americans clearly outweigh the costs imposed on the relatively few. And the morality is also on the side of homeowners and clearly against the banks.

Closing the control frauds would actually benefit honest bankers by eliminating the “Gresham dynamics” created by fraudulent institutions — a race to the bottom in underwriting. Since fraudulent banks use accounting fraud to manufacture high profits, they do not actually have to use a viable business model. By eliminating control fraud from the financial sector, it will be much easier for honest banks to succeed.

Further, the financial system has massive excess capacity — as evidenced by the need to create bubble after bubble to find outlets for capacity. Almost all of the innovations in practice and instruments of the past two decades were spurred not by demand but rather by excess capacity. Downsizing the financial sector is critical to restoring it to a size that is commensurate with the needs of the economy.

The cost of not closing control frauds, by contrast, can be staggering. The business practices that maximize the fictional reported income (e.g., making “liar’s loans to people who cannot repay their loans) maximize real losses and hyper-inflate financial bubbles. Control frauds destroy wealth at a prodigious rate. The one thing we certainly cannot afford is leaving the control frauds under the control of fraudulent CEOs.

Can the Frauds be Foreclosed?

The assertion that the SDIs cannot be resolved because of their size is unsupported. Very large institutions have already been resolved both in this country and abroad. The “too big to fail” (TBTF) doctrine has always been unproven, dangerous, and counter to the law. An institution that is not permitted to fail faces obvious adverse incentive problems. It also destroys healthy competition with institutions that are not considered TBTF. It encourages risk-taking and fraud. And it subverts the law, which requires that insolvent institutions must be resolved.

As we write this piece, the markets are taking it upon themselves to begin to close down the control frauds — with homeowners fighting the foreclosures and investors demanding that the banks take back the toxic waste. Unfortunately, following the market solution will be a long-drawn-out and costly process — both in terms of tying up the judicial system but also in terms of the uncertainty and despair that will persist. At the end of that process, the banks will have to be resolved. No matter how much the politicians dislike it, they will end up with the banks in their hands — either now or later. Taking them now is the right thing to do.

14 Responses

  1. It has been said that it is better to let nine guilty men go free than to convict one innocent man…I say it is better to let nine so-called deadbeats keep their homes than to allow one honest, hard-working American to lose his home to the fraudulent and criminal acts of the banks!!

  2. I’m called a liar and accused of altering my income. Perhaps I should just go turn myself in. Since lawyers are either too costly and I can’t find one to defend, atleast this way I would be granted one by the court. Then the prosecuteing attorney would have to produce the note.

  3. I agree 100% with the moratorium. If the banksters cannot produce the note and the homeowners are not indebted anymore, it will be like taking the CHAINS off of our feet and off of our lives. We will again be FREE to sell our homes, to up-size for larger families and down-size for retirement, to transfer for any job opportunity in a different area. The values will begin to go up and the homeowners can again visit the home improvement and landscaping stores. We could even purchase furniture and fix the pool outside. Can we imagine how better our neighborhoods will begin to look and the jobs that will be created. America could finally start getting back to normal again.

    It will take only a short time to weed out the culprits in the banking system who were attempting to take over the lives of most of the middle class in America. Believe me, they have affected everyone’s life, even those who are paying on their mortgages right now. It is their GREED that is being passed on to our grandkids.THEY are the main cause of not being able to get the job market back on course and THEY are the ones responsible for most of America’s homeowners losing any equity or down payment they had in their property.

    Then, after the Banksters had just about finished getting us set up to dispose of, the American Public was foolish enough to give these banksters even more money (the TARP funds) to help them give more bonuses to their CEO’S and then foreclose(steal) more property from us. ” ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.”

    “BURNED ONCE, SHAME ON THEM, BURNED TWICE, SHAME ON US”

    Let them be replaced with the type of lenders and Banks that abide by the all the laws and rules of our Land and who believe in the American People and in “OUR DREAM OF RESPONSIBLE HOME OWNERSHIP” and not their own Greed at our expense.

    Let us release these shackles that they (the Banksters) have placed on us, and our homes. “Let us pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and get back in the race.” WE DESERVE IT, AMERICA DESERVES IT.

    “MAY THE MORATORIUM BEGIN”.

  4. Linda,

    Amen. Restore our ONCE-Great nation.

  5. I agree with Linda and with BSE

    Here is another tip for the banksters. Maddoff uses the services of this company.
    http://www.americanprisonconsultants.com/

  6. Yes. Great plan.

    1. Moratorium nationwide on foreclosures (and evictions)

    2. Call in the notes nationwide. No notes. No loan. No case. Clear titles in favor of homeowners/borrowers.

    3. For alleged lenders who have not responded to homeowners’ debt validation letters and requests, refused their tenders of payment, void those notes. If lenders have foreclosed anyway and/or evicted, pay damages to homeowners. Get their homes back or equivalent. They don’t belong on the streets.

    4. “Correct” principals on all home loans made during a certain period of time.

    5. Create a vehicle for clear titles. Restore credit reports.

    6. ?? (You fill it in)

    The above can also be seen as a form of bank bailout, because we could make it a LOT worse on them, but it will save us all a lot of time and money down the road. During the above corrective process, we can weed out those banksters who are culpable and potentially prosecute.

    As said before, it will be much cheaper to fix the problems in favor of the homeowners/borrowers (JUSTICE) than it will to go after banks who make themselves insolvent, tie up the courts with massive law suits for years on end, throw more government/taxpayer money at the problem, hound the FDIC to do something, … The more time we let go by, the more law suits will be filed …and rightfully so.

    The overall economy will benefit from increased spending not going toward outrageous inflated house payments and instead going toward products and services and starting small businesses, … (hopefully U.S. made)

    In general, let’s start improving the lives of our own people for a “CHANGE” and restore the public confidence in this nation we keep saying is so GREAT.

  7. BSE,

    Yep, and I’ve heard that, along with their new attire, they need to be forewarned about bending over in the shower. If you drop your soap, just leave it. I’ve also seen horror stories on mop handles used for purposes totally unrelated to moping.

    But these scum offender-pretender-lenders have a way of ending up in the ‘country-club’ jails, not in with the normal mix of prisoners. They still have connections that can buy them special privileges, even in jail.

  8. Excellent summation of the entire foreclosure fraud. It would be great if we could get some more whistleblowers who worked at the banks to give us some of the people who actually concocted this nightmare. There are so many entities and so many people involved in this destruction of the middle class.
    http://www.challengingforeclosure.com Sirak@challengingforeclosure.com

  9. Thanks to Neil Garfield , Mr. Black and Mr. Wray.
    My hope is that these guys will team up and have a few
    banksters jailed in a timely fashion. Let me know when we can order the orange suits.

  10. Yep that’s it spot on….you ate locked in 1 year and after using up all your reserve in my case I pulled every dime of ” equity” out of my prior home which didn’t sell ( because unbeknown to me the market was already showing signs of decline hence I couldn’t sell it and the new build was ready but no matter just get a line if credit so you have the cash reserve to prop up your payments each month then you can refinance into a lower monthly payment once the one year lock in is over and the vue of the home will go up there’s more to this coersion to get my signature they had my downpayment and I wouldn’t get it back if I backed out of the deal I had already invested but the most exciting thing was I bieved I really believed I had made close to 200k whilst the home was bring built that’s why I signed period…. That clinched it for me and we know the rest I wake up one year later and I’m upside down I’m facing bankruptcy as my only option I’ve equated every resource done all the overtime I can to the point of not seeing straight and I hit that wall of reality and I’m finanicially ruined and I just dint get it how I came to this …..how could I be so stupid…. And then after a little research I realise I wAsn’t stupid I was ignorant nieve and not educated to the level of those responsible for setting me up I was a Patsy of choice all that was required was certain criteria mainly a high credit score. I’m sorry to go over old old ground but why isn’t something being done look at all the seriously intelegent people professors attorneys with vast experience the very fact that mers came into existance the ghost towns and the empty houses isn’t the writing on the wall and we alll sit here waiting for the breakthru my god I don’t think it’s coming if our nation was invaded the majority would simple flick the remote to another channel… Today my mojo is just not happening but when I read bill black Neil Matt weidner annonymous and Brian davies and beth Findsen it’s encouraging and I thank you for being on the side of good and what is right. There really is no other way to look at it. Something is either good as in truth or it’s bad as in lies.

  11. I have two points to make here

    1) I submitted ACCURATE information on the loan application. I recall correcting the typed version of that application. The indication that I was HALF owner of an income property had conveniently disappeared. It had been reflected very clearly in my had-written information.

    The actual loan docs that I have now show the incorrect income that I tried to get corrected. I’m not sure if it is the same page that was present at signing. Only initials are shown on that page so a different page may have been inserted, or I may have even overlooked checking for that correction. My income was inflated by $2000 per month with this trick. At the time, with the job I held, any intentional fraud such as this could have cost me my job.

    2) Even with an actual “full-doc” loan application, I have been told by insiders that the docs that went to the pool, and hence to any investors, were changed to “no-doc” applications.

  12. I’ve just realized the most shocking piece of this whole mess is that the most on-point, unbiased reporting on the meltdown is now being done by the Huffington Post!

    Kudo’s to them (which I NEVER thought I’d say), but the bigger question is where in the world is the “mainstream media”?

  13. How you like this new BoA Story ?

    http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/article1133148.ece

  14. Great article.

    The authors state “That homeowners would default on the nonprime mortgages was a foregone conclusion throughout the industry — indeed, it was the desired outcome. This was something the lending side knew, but which few on the borrowing side could have realized.”

    Yes – it was the desired outcome.

    And the authors write – “Many homeowners were sold on the idea that “real estate values only go up” — and quite a few planned to refinance on better terms,..”

    Yes – the authors allude to speculators here – but MOST homeowners believed the value of the their home asset and that they would be able to refinance or sell the home if personal circumstances changed. Instead, these homeowners became trapped – unable to refinance and unable to sell their home.

    To blame the homeowners is simply egregious.

    How dare the President call nearly a quarter percent of the American public – “deadbeats.”

    Thanks to Mr. Black and Mr. Wray.

Contribute to the discussion!

%d bloggers like this: