Livinglies's Weblog

Some telephone numbers that are not easy to find

13 Responses

1. 

   sandrashultz805, on May 29, 2016 at 10:26 pm said:

   I bought an investment home to help my mom in 2005 it was sopposed to be a HUD home.IT sold on 01/27/2005 to a broker named Botnick Realty.It was by CutlerGMAC .ON 02/07/2005 I put in a bid ,my nightmare begins. on paperwork it says Michaelson,Connor & Boul 5312 bolsa ave. suite 200 Huntington Beach,Ca. 92649 now on my title it says attorney in fact FIRMIN BOUL for secretary of housing and urbin development..state of Ca. county of Orange sadly after looking under my social security number ….theres no record. in my name Lakeside Title and escrow agency,inc 123 west prospert ave. suite 150 Cleveland,ohio 44115 I have been fighting since oct 2015 when my first home I bought in 1999 was sheriff actioned off.no one contacted me lol.anyways after I was scamed by a lawyer in Dublin ohio. who got me in default on my current home sharred my information with the lawyer MR.MANELY from Dublin also.The firm drops me (TROY DOUCET) and refunds me 500.00.At this point after being bullyed by yet a nuther want to be lawyer x state attorney general Mr. Dann …..who wants me to tell him how ive been wronged.I a process finish grinder basicly a great laborer until the Timken company bearing went out of bisness filed chaper after 200 years of being in canton ohio…my current lawer bill is 800.00 monthly.jp morgan who has taken 2 homes already .20,000 in misc. fees on my current home lived here 12 years payed over 95,000.00 and still owe them 90,000.00 I borrowed 100,000.00 I put 12,000.00 cash down from my 401k …..should I just give up ? stark country records change dayly no one cares.

   Loading...
2. 

   sandrashultz805, on May 29, 2016 at 9:44 pm said:

   Reblogged this on sandrakblog and commented:
   WOW FOUND THEM

   Loading...
3. 

   Ann, on November 13, 2010 at 1:49 pm said:

   I have a signature of Mark Wooton on a copy of a LPOA from Wells. Does anyone have anything signed by him so I can compare? I can email it directly to you.

   Loading...
4. 

   usedkarguy, on November 7, 2010 at 9:51 pm said:

   when he says “borrowers can’t defend title” he’s saying that YOU are the TITLE HOLDER. That’s why the first thing they do is kindly ask for a “Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure”.

   For instance (this is posted at “Wisconsin Law”):
   Wisconsin is a state which follows the lien theory of mortgages. In other words, the mortgagee does not have legal title in the mortgaged premises Section 708.01 Wis.Stats. See also, Mutual Fed. S. & L Assoc. v. Wisconsin Wire Works., 58, 58 Wis. 2d 99, 104, 205 N.W2d762 (1973). The mortgagor retains full ownership in the property, which consists of equitable and legal title, while the mortgagee’s interest is that of a lien holder. Therefore, the mortgagee’s status is that of a holder of a security interest Osborn, Mortgages, sec. 127 at 208.See also, Bank of Commerce v. Waukesha County, 89 Wis. 2d 7155, 279 N.W.2d 237 (1979).

   YOU are the MORTGAGOR! You are the equity owner in the real property. WAKE UP!

   And Maher, if I show that the M-7, M9 Certificates of the trust are in the TARP 1, and also Goldman CDO, and the NOD was generated in December 07, is that proof of said receivership status?

   Loading...
5. 

   usedkarguy, on November 7, 2010 at 9:36 pm said:

   Maher, somebody hacked yer old e-mail secondarytrade…….but…but…
   THANK YOU! Now THAT was worth a thousand bucks!

   Now kiddies, listen up. That was a mouthful. He missed an “and, maybe a conjunctive adverb, but HE’S RIGHT!

   A loan to a trust plus insurance plus fees then sold, partial retained value (svcg rights). Loan to pool to bond plus insurance plus forced default (more fees) less extinguishment means the debt is lost to the bondholder and the insurer. The only thing left standing IS THE MORAL OBLIGATION, AKA UNSECURED DEBT. That is why the mortgages MUST go unrecorded; and to provide cover under “holder in due course” for the predatory lending/false underwriting/blatant fraud.

   Let me see, the accounting fraud is the collection of the real estate without any right to the property nor any place to account for the dough without 100% taxation. The credit bid extinguishes the carry value and VIOLA: shit turned to gold, with the help of the substitute trustees (lawyers and unlicensed real estate brokers). Now, where did the money go? To those Cayman Island accounts with all the Goldman guys names’ on them.

   Loading...
6. 

   Ann, on November 7, 2010 at 7:26 pm said:

   Thank you, Steve, for the info on Mark Wooton.

   Loading...
7. 

   mortgagelies, on November 7, 2010 at 4:36 am said:

   HAMP Modification and B65 Modification for home retention workout options

   How can Servicers consider Borrowers for a HAMP Modification if servicing violates FAS 140 under GAAP? Wake the fun up! Home retention workout options are offered only upon a title holder’s concession – you still do not get it? Lenders continue to foreclose under the veil of an FDIC receivership enforced by the Dept of Treasury. By serendipitously foreclosing on a bad investment we get side tracked by HAMP smokers hope for Hemp (?) And …ONLY A BENEFICIAL INTEREST CAN FORECLOSE AND MERS IS THE MEANS AND METHOD FOR THE LOSS OF THAT ORGINAL INTEREST . . . I told you so…embrace MERS (we are).

   These delinquent “loans” are divested under GAAP accounting rules and prohibit a lender who must commit an accounting fraud in a recovery.

   Borrowers can’t defend title under the complicated and difficult accounting rules that attorneys no less understand. A mortgage is HELD as an investment and not SOLD. Loans SOLD for STOCK compounds the problem. STOCKS charged off to ZERO are case shut. Therefore, the arguments favor fee simple interest in realty and demand the right to defend title and fight back.

   Look, the mortgage is an encumbrance on title rights to the property. It cannot be enforceable under TARP if tendered for stock offered used as tender and for securing the investment in a “certificate versus a loan on real property.

   Dual consideration, multiple of capital stock offerings, additional paid in capital, divestment, codified FAS 140 and on and on. One web enthusiast called our findings conjecture – “can he add?” In other words “do the general ledger and lose the case law”. Or will case law circumvent “add and subtraction” shortfalls?

   Look, a lenders mortgage is an “ECONOMIC” interest where lenders claims fail and question subrogation by state for failed investments. Why consumers cannot see the wrongful foreclosure under GAAP and FAS 140 violations prohibiting all controlling interests in assets sold is unfortunate?

   First the parties foreclosing seem to always overemphasize a borrower’s obligation for repayment under the terms of the note and deed. Then consumer title holders must fight back the stigma of a moral obligation for the same argument. You cannot foreclose on a moral obligation.

   The terms and conditions are no longer in effect as the lender fights to win back your home.

   In foreclosure, lenders are highest bidder against consumer’s rights for claiming back the deed. The mortgage is lost to the same TARP program used to enforce a foreclosure.

   Remember a year or so from now when eating dinner and “60 Minutes” announces “How America’s home were stolen!”

   “Analyst”
   Mail to: secondarytradedesk@yahoo.com

   Only a licensed attorney can offer to provide legal advice. The parties herein accepts no responsibility for written material, general opinions, comments, open answers and non binding responses to questions when providing information. Only an attorney licensed in the state can offer or provide legal advice. The content herein and found online and part of website content is for reading and educational purposes only. Consult an attorney whenever your rights are in question and you or someone you know requires the expertise of legal counsel.

   Loading...
8. 

   Bill, on November 6, 2010 at 5:57 pm said:

   Neil:

   There is no rest for the wicked on your site! : )

   Loading...
9. 

   pelucheven, on November 6, 2010 at 9:36 am said:

   the list of shame!!!!!

   let us keep bringing them out into the open. their names must be known and their activities prosecuted

   Loading...
10. 

    frankielee, on November 6, 2010 at 8:37 am said:

    You left out the FBI, the SEC, and the IRS. I believe the bankers will need to be talking quite a bit with them before all is said and done.

    Loading...
11. 

    Steve, on November 6, 2010 at 6:31 am said:

    Ctrl+F for Mark Wooton here: http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2010/11/04/full-deposition-transcript-of-hollan-fintel-former-florida-default-law-group-attorney/

    Loading...
12. 

    Ann, on November 6, 2010 at 6:14 am said:

    Anyone know anything about Mark Wooton at Wells? I have a copy of a POA that has his signature rubber-stamped; title of “Assistant Vice-President”. (Of what, it doesn’t say.) He seems to be in Iowa, but that’s as far as I’ve gotten.

    Thanks

    Loading...
13. Tweets that mention Some telephone numbers that are not easy to find « Livinglies's Weblog -- Topsy.com, on November 6, 2010 at 2:27 am said:

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Simi Valley Dude, Financial Wellness. Financial Wellness said: Property Preservation Servicer Contacts Company Names Mailing Information Key Contacts Title/Department Phone Am… http://bit.ly/dyL9pM […]

    Loading...