TONITE: Homeowners/Layman Teleconference Podcast Show

Posted on March 11, 2009 by Neil Garfield

Subject: Homeowners and Lawyers Teleconference Podcast Shows 

March 26, 2009

Live Interview with Florida Attorney “Gator” Bradshaw 

Click on Upcoming Events tab for Access Info

Filed under: foreclosure |

« »

13 Responses

  1. ALLAN (just drove Boston to Miami to fight a SJM as a PRO SE the day of the March 25 Podcast) < WISH ME LUCK!, on March 24, 2009 at 8:18 pm said:

    Don’t know what one can argue in 5 minutes, but believe I’ll have a tactical advantage, since law mill plaintiff is appearing telephonically, and I’ve got my affidavits lined up to build the record to show the judge borrower’s signatures were FORGED, assignments were NOT RECORDED, and much much more. Wish me luck! Wish I didn’t have to be my own hero. We Pro Ses have a tough row to hoe.

    Thanks to Neil, Ron, Mario, Ny, April, Dawn and countless others.

    Any chance we can get those valuable workbooks at a deleveraged discount?

    RSVP
    Allan
    BeMoved@AOL.com

  2. JLS, on March 24, 2009 at 10:02 am said:

    HOW WILL THE BORROWERS RIGHTS BE AFFECTED IF THE INVESTOR WELFARE PROGRAM COMES INTO EFFECT?

    HOW WILL THESE CROOKS BE ABLE TO CONSOLIDATE ALL THE TOXIC WASTE OUT THERE TO SELL IT TO US THE GULLIBLE AMERICANS?

    WILL WE BE ABLE TO SUE FOR OUR HOMES UNDER THIS WELFARE PROGRAM ENACTED BY THE TREASURY AND THE FEDS???

  3. Ken, on March 15, 2009 at 6:42 pm said:

    Is there a way to download the podcast? I can’t seem to find a link. Thanks.

  4. Philip S., on March 12, 2009 at 11:54 pm said:

    TRO denied in central district court but it pused back the sale date to next month. my lawyer thinks i should sign a forbearance aggreement with litton ….. I keep telling him to persue the extended rescission and he keep shinning me on.

  5. Philip S., on March 12, 2009 at 11:23 pm said:

    in wha t court have people benn getting TRO’s granted?

  6. jeff, on March 12, 2009 at 2:45 pm said:

    Does anyone know if the previous podcasts are available on this site.

    Thank You

  8. Sam Adams, on March 12, 2009 at 1:50 pm said:

    how do we sign on to the podcast?

  9. Philip S., on March 12, 2009 at 12:15 pm said:

    Neil,
    My attorny just filed a complaint in federal court monday against the current lender/servicer for non-compliance of extended rescission notice and time is running short for the SOL to file against my previous lender for the same(but different incidents), should my lawyer have included them in the same complaint? Neverlessis there a filing procedure that can extend the 1 year SOL to bring a private lawsuit for non-compliance of extended rescission on a paid off loan, & if so which court do i file it in?

    Please .. If you answer to my post in a timely fashion i swear to GOD I will donate $50 for now & more in the near future. don’t forget to brief home owners what court to file thier complaints in during the podcast thank you Brad thank you Neil & GODBLESS

  10. SF_Dan, on March 12, 2009 at 7:18 am said:

    Hello Again Mr. Garfield and Staff:

    I neglected the third leg of the workbench (more supporting legs to follow) for the ‘homeowner’ teleconference: the proper considerations for a layman’s thorough and adequate content of an effectively aggressive/defensive pleading.

    Authentically,

    SF_Dan

  11. SF_Dan, on March 12, 2009 at 6:43 am said:

    typo–>… 1)Standing to foreclose…

  12. SF_Dan, on March 12, 2009 at 6:40 am said:

    Today’s ‘attorney’ teleconference was really great, and its content is the basis for these comments and questions for tomorrow’s ‘homeowner’ teleconference.

    First, please explain to the layman audience who and what the ‘pretender lender’ is (mortgage servicer/trustee) that is asserting the foreclosure action, and why (property gain). Please explain how the foreclosure action by the ‘pretender lender’ is ULTRA VIRES (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_vires) and why it is unenforceable according to the RULE OF LAW (multi-pronged defenses) generally, and as it pertains to PROPERTY (vested fundamental right_CONSTITUTIONAL). Further, to counter the media’s silence on foreclosure defense please touch on the illusory hoodwinking of the foreclosure hysteria and sensationalism that the media has been covering, and then explain the challenge heretofore of the automatic credibility provided to the ‘pretender lenders,’ but for your emerging REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF CORRECTNESS.

    Second, please explain in detail the standards of proof and the key elements to your foreclosure defense for aggressively insisting that the party moving for foreclosure prove up: 1) tanding to foreclose; 2) Ownership of mortgage note; 3) Broken chain-of-title.

    Many thanks in advance to you and your staff for your diligence, dedication, and sacrifices.

    Authentically,

    SF_Dan

  13. SAM DAWKINS, on March 12, 2009 at 2:15 am said:

    THANKS FOR DOING THE PODCAST

Contribute to the discussion!

%d bloggers like this: