Mortgage Meltdown: Defending Your Property: Strategies

Mortgage Meltdown: Defending Your Property — A Summary of Strategies

This post is for both homeowners and attorneys dealing with existing foreclosure, threatened foreclosure or distressed situations. There are many situations, particularly in government-backed loans, where the lender MUST negotiate to mitigate losses or they are subject to treble damages. This posting is not intended to be legal advice inasmuch as regulations are different and change from State to State. It is only intended to be a guide for those who wish to stop the threat  of foreclosure and eviction and might be useful even in auto loans and other forms of consumer credit including credit cards. 

There are specific remedies that you may wish to pursue including forbearance, modification, forgiveness, and others. Which one you choose, or whether you choose all of them as a shotgun method of deterring the lenders is a matter that you should seek and get competent legal counsel to advise you. Your goals should be the to stop the foreclosure and if possible stop the payments that are “due” because you were the victim of an organized system of fraud that was worldwide. Your exit strategy is a deal where you stay in your house, you get terms you can afford, you get damages where appropriate, and recover attorney fees and costs where appropriate. 

The filing of a lis pendens along with a counterclaim, and various requests for discovery will probably be an effective tool in turning the tables on the lenders. However, state law must be carefully checked along with Federal law with Federal agencies are involved, before filing a lis pendens or a counterclaim. 

A stay might be obtained where there is potential criminal liability in parallel investigations or pending prosecutions. Defendants have a right to invoke their fifth amendment privilege in criminal prosecutions without (theoretically) causing any prejudice to their case. In civil cases, a person or company may invoke the fifth amendment privilege against self incrimination, but the trier of fact is entitled to draw an inference of fact from the person’s refusal to answer — especially where the person or entity is the Plaintiff or Petitioner as in the case of most foreclosures.  

It is therefore likely that immediately upon filing a claim or counterclaim that alleges violations of criminal statutes, a party will ask for a stay of the proceedings. And in most cases, the Judge will be inclined to grant it. In the meantime, the owner/borrower remains in the house, and possibly gets to avoid making any payments while the litigation is pending — particularly where the counterclaim alleges compensatory, exemplary, punitive, and/or treble damages. 

In cases where bankruptcy or assignment for creditors occurs for the lender or one of the parties in the decision-making chain on the lender or investor side, it is entirely possible for the mortgage to “fall between the cracks.” Therefore a suit to quiet title should probably accompany the counterclaims for damages and other equitable relief.  

The assumption behind this guide is that the lenders and all the other players — developers, appraisers, construction lenders, banks, mortgage brokers, underwriters, lenders, investment bankers, retail brokerages, rating agencies and financial advisers all have potential liability in the mortgage meltdown. The general fact pattern assumed is that the borrower was steered into a purchase and loan arrangement under high pressure sales tactics and deceptive claims and that the buyers of collateralized debt obligations (CDO’s) were deceived as well in like fashion.

The principal claims are active, intentional deception, failure to adequately disclose the terms of the transactions, failure to disclose rebates, and yield spread premiums that went to various parties (including the sellers, the mortgage brokers and the lender), and failure to disclose the risks of the transaction. It may be fairly said that if borrowers were told the truth about what was in store for them, they would not have entered into the transaction. If they know the values were inflated, neither the borrowers nor the CDO investors would have entered into the transactions. 

The basic thrust of the strategy is to put the lenders and their co-conspirators on the defensive. The end goal is to save the property, keep it occupied, present a clear alternative (to the lender) to writing off huge losses, and mitigating the losses to ALL parties, whether they are culpable or not. If at all possible, these cases should be settled and not litigated through trial. We are now traveling at the rate of over 270 new class actions per year resulting from the credit crisis and the number is likely to get larger by far. This rate exceeds anything in American history. 

Remember to consider the original people involved in obtaining the construction loan to the developer. It is quite likely that these were the same people or had the same knowledge about what they were doing to the borrowers and the unsuspecting investors that they knew would get the brunt of this mess. 

In your pleadings, it should be stated that this scheme resulted in the largest currency devaluation in modern U.S. History, and affects every American, and every foreign person, government, agency, village or city that put money into pooled funds of the CDO’s. Check the news and you will see that local governments are cutting back on services, losing access to the money they had, and that both corporate and government pensions are at risk. This should be alleged as a perverse arrogant scheme with reckless disregard to the security of the country, as well as the criminal, civil and administrative laws applicable to these transactions. 

Do NOT, if you can avoid it, accept any loan modification that has any provision that even mentions inflation or any index on inflation. If hyperinflation sets in, this will mean a geometric increase in payments to the lenders even after you thought you had settled the issue. 

Additional forms for litigation, discovery, modifications, forbearance etc. are available by contacting and will be attached to Garfield’s HandBook for Attorneys in the Mortgage Meltdown due for publication in late March. Manuscripts and forms will be available in February for Download upon payment of $49.95 for digital download and $59.95 for hard copy including shipping and handling. Attorneys and borrowers and investors should give consideration to joining one of the many class action lawsuits that have already been filed. In addition, several investigations and prosecutions have begun in many states. In many cases state agencies and law enforcement are allowed to get more information than you can get in discovery in civil litigation. Cooperate closely with these agencies. 

Items to consider in lender liability: Most of these items can result in an award of attorney fees for the borrower’s attorney or the investor’s attorney depending upon whether you are representing one or the other. An interesting permutation of all this is that it is highly likely that a substantial number of people were borrowers under this scheme on one end, and were investors (at least indirectly) on the other end. In essence they were lending money to themselves and getting charged exorbitant fees for the privilege of doing so. Investors might not realize that their mutual fund, IRA, pension fund or whatever includes substantial CDO investments. They might not realize that their purchase of individual stocks might well have included financial and non-financial institutions that also have undisclosed substantial CDO risk. 


  1. TIL (Truth in Lending) disclosures: Did anyone actually read the provisions of the mortgage? Who advised the borrower about the future loan payments going up? Were the risks minimized in order to get the signature? Were the computations correct ( a mistake of even one cent anywhere on the documents gives you substantial leverage).
  2. ARM adjustment computations. There have already been several successful prosecutions and class actions against large lenders for computing and rounding numbers in their own favor when resetting the adjustable rate mortgages. A small mistake is grounds for stopping the foreclosure. 
  3. Aiding and abetting violation of securities laws: Don’t forget the investment houses that had the write-downs both here and abroad. The reason they stocked up on CDO portfolios is not that they thought it was such a good investment. The real reason was that they were having great success selling huge chunks of these securities to foreign governments, financial institutions, cities, state funds etc. They were accumulating inventory so that they could sell at a profit in addition to the fees.
  4. RICO: Pattern of behavior that constitutes organized criminal behavior: Treble damages and fees usually awarded. The theory here is that the incredible sophistication required to create these derivative securities and the the business model to market them belies the fact that each player in the scheme had to know they were not at risk. The only way they could know that they were not at risk was that they had covered themselves with self-serving valuation statements, letters of opinion from attorneys, ratings they had paid for from the major rating companies, and a tacit understanding that everyone would do their part in the scheme. It gave them “plausible deniability” as to any accusation that they knew the loans and the securities based on the loans were trash.
  5. Violation of state, federal and administrative laws and rules governing currency, banking and loans
  6. Fiduciary duty: superior position to borrower, reasonable reliance of the borrower on approval for loan, reasonable reliance on borrower on appraised value of him which was inflated, leading to controlling the borrower.
  7. Interference with contractual rights and obligations: Non-disclosed kickbacks contributed to inflating the prices and fees and steering the borrower into loans that were more expensive than lower priced loans for which the borrower qualified.
  8. Equitable subordination
  9. Duress
  10. Implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing
  11. Usury: Possible tie-in with credit card and other consumer debt
  12. Tying arrangements
  13. Deceptive Trade Practices
  14. Recharacterization of Transactions — changing the loan to (a) meet the reasonable expectations of the deceived borrower and (b) applying any damages awarded, attorneys fees, costs against balance due.
  15. Class Action Suits
  16. Stockholder derivative actions by the owners or equity interests or even debt instruments of corporations that participated in the deceptive scheme — remember to include the rating agencies — Moody’s, S&P, etc.
  17. Bankruptcy Actions: fraud actions and defenses can be initiated in bankruptcy court. When the lender attempts top get a relief from stay, they should be hit with the suit, asking for a stay of their right to relief from stay. 
  18. Preferential transfers and transfers in fraud of potential creditors: By moving the risk along a daisy chain to avoid liability, the parties knew they were creating multiple and confusing layers to avoid prosecution of criminal and civil claims. 
  19. Explore cram down options in bankruptcy. In the presence of fraud claims from the borrowers, cram down options might be more liberal than usual, depending upon the judge. 
  20. Discovery: Get access to emails, correspondence etc. dating back before the loan and relating to the creation of the loan product the borrower eventually was sold. Same for what they know of the other players — developer/seller, mortgage broker, appraiser, relations with investment bankers showing they knew they would not be carrying he risk of the loan ( shows they had not interest other than closing the deal without concern as to whether the deal went bad for borrower or lender). Get screen shots of websites and see if you have copies of web pages that were printed during the loan and sales process. Check for differences. If someone has been fired at the lender for the events leading up to the CDO and mortgage meltdown, get their deposition. Demand copies of drafts of documentation before it was presented to the borrower along with any emails or inter-office memos. Find out if anyone has consulted counsel for criminal exposure, employment litigation, or civil exposure. You can’t get the content of the conversation but you can get the answer to that question if you phrase it right.

Good Luck. More to Follow. GTC | Honor Website is in Construction. We are moving as fast as we can!

8 Responses

  1. I need help we have lost our home due to an illegal foreclosure. We were not in arrears and made our payment but the bank refused it and said we are returning ur payment. We found out after it was sold. They never complied to chapter 244 section 14. We never got our closing papers until 3/17/08 4 1/2 yrs after we closed and we had so many rights to rescind. Too involved to go on but I need help I want to get my story exposed the work is done I have the most complete papertrail u have ever seen. The bank would refuse a payment and send it back along with a reinstatement letter for 11,891 and we weren’t even in arrears.

  2. Ann,

    get yourself ready to perform a mortgage audit,
    get a qualified attorney and start fighting for your home, only less than 10% of all those who try to get their loan modified succeed in the process and still te current “lender or Servicing agent” might not have the proper authority to decide on your modification.

    Please read through this blog and learn as much as you can. It is very important that you are fully aware of how toxic your loan is and how to assert your rights. it is very likely that you were put nto a loan you could not afford, and that the lender violated TILA, the truth in Lending Act, it is very likely, they do not even have control or possession of the original promissory note, and that they do not even know who the actual note holder is. All this information may be very overwhelming, but for your own edification, just consider that all these lenders, investors, brokers and other market players procured among themselves to defraud you and many others.

  3. I need to learn everything I can to save my home. I want to force the bank to consider loan modification.

  4. very interesting.
    i’m adding in RSS Reader

  5. Thanks a million for this!! My whole family thinks now I’m insane and have lost it, as well as saying I “always need help”!! I’ve tried to tell them that our entire country will be in a disasterous mess from these suit and tie liars. Now that I can no longer afford an attorney because of the last liar agent, lender, and prior agent, and lender before that, this page certainly will come in handy.

  6. Real Estate and Organized Crime


    Stephen G. Bishop – Mortgage Consumer Advocate

    “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our
    liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow
    private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
    inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will
    grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property
    until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers
    Thomas Jefferson

    The FBI labeled the real estate/mortgage industry “Organized Crime” in a press release issued in 2002. The document also assigns the distinction of being “The new Mafia”.
    At the time, even the FBI probably wasn’t fully aware of the deep constructs of this industry and the highly orchestrated infrastructure that facilitates the blatant fleecing of homebuyers in America. Any systems analyst would recognize, with minimal analysis, that the industry is deliberately engineered for fraud, thrives on graft and corruption and answers to noone.

    As a former insider with a prior career in corporate finance, it didn’t take me long to not only see daily fraud first-hand, but marvel at the blatant admissions of mortgage industry “Professionals” that they knew what they were engaged in was fraud, but had no fear of law enforcement. More than one broker told me “We own the politicians”!when I asked how they get away with it. Truly, the NAR, NAMB and other real estate organizations are the most powerful in the world and operate freely under their own rules.

    Below is my attempt to encapsulate the circle of fraud the real estate industry operates in and how it does it. The list, though, is not complete, limited by my sphere of knowledge and is likely far more extensive. Limited as it may be, the list fairly depicts an industry in total anarchy.

    NAR 3rd largest political contributor

    Rosy projections by “Chief Economist”

    Influence peddling

    NAMB Heavy presence on Appraisal Sub-

    DRE Indiscriminate volume licensing

    Token, minimal enforcement

    Deliberately understaffed

    Intentional low barriers to entry

    State Appraisal Agencies Indiscriminate volume licensing

    No enforcement

    Deliberate stifling of complaints

    Conveniently understaffed

    Funded by licensing fees


    Intentional low barriers to entry

    Deliberate foot-dragging on
    Improvements to requirements

    Realtors Misrepresentation of properties

    Bait and switch


    Minimal education

    Unqualified financial advice

    Financial skullduggery

    Singularity of purpose

    False advertising

    False complexity

    Influencing appraisers

    Influencing inspectors

    Influencing title companies

    Brokers “No fiduciary responsibility”

    Yield Spread Premiums

    Bait and switch

    Falsifying loan applications

    Ordering inflated appraisals


    Unqualified, deceptive financial advice

    Pressuring inspectors


    Non-value added middlemen

    Loan Officers False solicitations


    Bait and switch

    Unqualified, deceptive financial advice

    Ordering inflated appraisals

    Pressuring inspectors

    High pressure sales tactics

    Title Officers Excess fees

    Controlled by brokers

    State Tax authorities Overlook value increases in favor of
    higher property tax revenues

    State AGs Look the other way.

    Refer complaints to DREs

    Mortgage lenders Minimal appraisal review

    Unqualified reviewers

    Waiving risk management norms

    Look the other way

    Mortgage Servicers Manufacture foreclosures

    False fees

    Force-placed insurance

    “Suspense accounts”

    “Accounting Irregularities”

    Real Estate Attorneys Full knowledge and participation


    Misrepresentation of independence

    City officials Full knowledge and consent

    Escrow Officers Excessive fees for unnecessary

    Mortgage lender attorneys Lawsuit delays

    Submission of false declarations

    Submission of false company

    Judicial corruption

    Real estate schools Indiscriminate acceptance

    Profiting from student success

    Supported by State agencies

    Facilitation of over-licensing

    Consumer Protection agencies Ignorance



    Issue avoidance


    When consumers expend incomes for goods and services, they expect a modicum of
    integrity and value for their dollar. Whether it be auto repairs, groceries, airline tickets or diapers, the consumer has confidence that a product or service is and does what it is represented to be/do. However, when consumers’ largest acquisition involving more emotion than sense and most significant symbol of success takes place, it occurs in an environment where the consumer is at the mercy of unregulated thugs who will tell them anything to get their money, and where there is no protection from exploitation.

    Such a system, rife with conflicts of interest, black holes of money laundering, inextricable links between organizations and cooperative collusion didn’t just evolve naturally. Nobody’s that stupid. The architects of the real estate industry have designed and built a nuclear weapon, far more dangerous to the U.S. (and the world) than Al Qaeda. The “American Dream” should not be a dream. Imagine if the real estate industry controlled toilet-paper production!

    So who’s going to step up to the plate and break up the “New Mafia”?

    October 2007

  7. […] Mortgage Meltdown: Defending Your Property eventually was sold. Same for what they know of the other players developer/seller, mortgage broker…Mortgage Meltdown: Defending Your Property This post is for both homeowners and attorneys… or investor side, it is entirely possible for the mortgage to “fall between the cracks.” Therefore a suit…, appraisers, construction lenders, banks, mortgage brokers, underwriters, lenders, investment bankers, retail brokerages, rating agencies and financial advisers all have potential liability in the mortgage […]

  8. […] TMZ Staff wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThis post is for both homeowners and attorneys dealing with existing foreclosure, threatened foreclosure or distressed situations. There are many situations, particularly in government-backed loans, where the lender MUST negotiate to … […]

Contribute to the discussion!

%d bloggers like this: